欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2017, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (8): 899-903.

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

替吉奥胶囊联合放疗治疗乳腺癌的临床疗效及对肿瘤标志物、人类表皮生长因子受体-2、中期因子水平的影响研究

闫建强,聂改红   

  1. 平煤神马医疗集团总医院肿瘤科,平顶山 467000,河南
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-14 修回日期:2017-05-12 出版日期:2017-08-26 发布日期:2017-08-18
  • 作者简介:闫建强,本科,主治医师,研究方向:肺癌、乳腺癌内科治疗。 Tel:15836929921 E-mail:53441865@qq.com

Effect of gimeracil capsules combined with radiotherapy on breast cancer and on tumor markers, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and midkine levels

YAN Jianqiang,NIE Gaihong   

  1. Department of Oncology, General Hospital of China Pingmei Shenma Medical Group, Pingdingshan 467000,Henan, China
  • Received:2017-03-14 Revised:2017-05-12 Online:2017-08-26 Published:2017-08-18

摘要:

目的: 探究替吉奥胶囊联合放疗治疗乳腺癌的临床疗效及对肿瘤标志物、人类表皮生长因子受体-2(HER-2)、中期因子(MK)水平的影响。方法: 抽取2010年1月至2016年5月本院收治的64例乳腺癌患者,通过随机数表法分组,各32例。对照组采用三维适形放疗,研究组联合采用三维适形放疗+替吉奥胶囊,共治疗2个疗程。统计对比两组临床疗效、不良反应发生率,分析治疗前后两组肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、CA125、CA153]及MK、HER-2水平变化情况。结果: 研究组治疗有效率(50.00%)、肿瘤控制率(81.25%)高于对照组(25.00%、53.13%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前两组CEA、CA125、CA153水平对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),经治疗,两组各指标水平较治疗前降低,且研究组CEA、CA125、CA153水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前两组HER-2及MK水平对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),经治疗,两组各指标水平较治疗前降低,且研究组HER-2及MK水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组均未出现IV度不良反应,研究组白细胞减少、腹泻、呕吐恶心发生率(34.38%、34.38%、37.51%)与对照组(31.24%、37.51%、34.37%)对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 替吉奥胶囊联合放疗治疗乳腺癌效果显著,可改善血清肿瘤标志物、HER-2及MK表达水平,且安全性较高,值得推广。

关键词: 替吉奥胶囊, 放疗, 乳腺癌, 肿瘤标志物, 人类表皮生长因子受体-2

Abstract:

 AIM: To explore the effect of gimeracil capsules combined with radiotherapy on breast cancer, and on tumor marker, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and level of midkine (MK).  METHODS: Sixty-four breast cancer patients were selected by random number table method from January 2010 to May 2016 in our hospital, sixty-two cases in each group. The control group was treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; the study group was treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and gimeracil capsule; the therapy continued for 2 courses of treatment. Clinical efficacy and adverse reaction incidence rate were compared between two groups; tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CA153) and changes of MK, HER-2 level were analyzed. RESULTS:The effective rate (50%) and tumor control rate (81.25%) of the study group were higher than those of the control group (25%, 53.13%), the difference were statistically significant (P<0.05); Before treatment, no significant difference of CEA, CA125, CA153 was observed between groups (P>0.05), while all the indexes decreased after treatment, and the study group presented more significant change than the control group (P<0.05); Before treatment, no significant difference of HER-2 and MK level was observed between groups (P>0.05), while all the indexes decreased after treatment, and the study group presented more significant change than the control group (P<0.05). Both groups presented no IV degrees of adverse reactions, and compared with control group (31.24%, 37.51%, 34.37%), the incidence of leucopenia, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting (34.38%, 34.38%, 37.51%) of the study group presented no statistically significance (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Gimeracil capsules combined with radiotherapy exhibited remarkable effect on breast cancer, and on the serum tumor markers, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and midkine expression level. With high safety, it is worthy of promotion.

Key words: gimeracil capsules, radiotherapy, breast cancer, tumor marker, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2

中图分类号: