中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 1253-1256.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-12-06

• 科研论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

学龄前儿童中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表父母版的信效度检验

张慧凤1,张劲松1,2,帅澜1,路腾飞1,夏卫萍1,王周烨1,谭歆1   

  1. 1 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院临床心理科、儿童与青少年保健科,上海 200092;
    2 教育部与上海市环境与儿童健康重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-28 发布日期:2016-12-01 出版日期:2016-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 张劲松,E-mailzhangjs2304@xinhuamed.com.cn
  • 作者简介:张慧凤(1992-),女,安徽人,在读研究生,主要研究方向为儿童注意缺陷多动障碍。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(14411968600)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham,version Ⅳ scale-parent form.

1,LU Teng-fei1,XIA Wei-ping1,WANG Zhou-ye1,TAN Xin1.   

  1. 1 Department of Medical Psychology,Department of Child and Adolescent Health Care,Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200092 China;
    2 Ministry of Education and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environment Health,Shanghai 200092 China
  • Received:2016-06-28 Online:2016-12-01 Published:2016-12-01
  • Contact: ZHANG Jin-song,E-mail:zhangjs2304@xinhuamed.com.cn

摘要: 目的 评价中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表-父母版在学龄前儿童中的适用性。方法 选择门诊诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童200名以及附近幼儿园的81名正常儿童为研究对象,年龄范围4岁~5岁11个月。请其家长填写SNAP-Ⅳ父母版后,问卷进行内部一致性和验证性因素分析,其中75名家长填写Conners问卷,265名家长填写CBCL量表以检查效标效度。32名家长间隔2周之后再次填写SNAP-Ⅳ以检查重测信度。结果 SNAP-Ⅳ重测信度为0.68~0.84(P<0.001),内部一致性系数为0.84~0.93;SNAP-Ⅳ与Conners问卷及CBCL量表因子相关系数为r=0.38~0.79(P<0.01);验证性因素分析显示,SNAP-Ⅳ 3因子模型结构拟合良好;实证效度在SNAP-Ⅳ各因子评分上,ADHD组显著高于年龄、性别相匹配的正常组(t=-4.22~-9.67,P<0.001)。结论 中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表父母版在学前儿童中具有良好的信度和效度,适用于我国文化背景。

关键词: SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表, 学龄前儿童, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham,version Ⅳ scale(SNAP-Ⅳ)-parent form for preschooler in China. Method Parents of kindergarten students(4 y 0 m~5 y 11 m,n=81)and parents of non-reference clinical patients with ADHD(4 y 0 m~5 y 11 m,n=200) completed the SNAP-Ⅳ,75 of which completed Conners,265 of which completed Child Bahabior Checklist (CBCL) 32 of them completed SNAP-Ⅳ retest after 2 weeks. Results Retest reliability was 0.68~0.84 and Cronbach α coefficient was 0.84~0.93.Subscales of SNAP-Ⅳ were moderately correlated (r=0.38~0.79,P<0.001)with subscales of Conners and CBCL.Lisrel Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three factors model of SNAP-Ⅳ was reasonable.Compared with the normal control group,the ADHD group got higher scores in all aspects,which had significant statistically differences (t=-4.22~-9.67,P<0.001). Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SNAP-Ⅳ-parent form are satisfactory among preschooler in China.

Key words: Swanson Nolan and Pelham-Ⅳ, preschooler, reliability, validity

中图分类号: