双水平气道正压通气在早产儿轻度呼吸窘迫综合征的应用及对早期肺功能的影响

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-0332

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 197-201.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-0332

双水平气道正压通气在早产儿轻度呼吸窘迫综合征的应用及对早期肺功能的影响

张慧杰,温晓红,黄会芝,潘军平,沈佩婷,吴万云

安徽医科大学第三附属医院儿科,安徽合肥 230061

收稿日期:2018-06-01 修回日期:2018-08-22 发布日期:2019-02-20 出版日期:2019-02-20
通讯作者: 温晓红,E-mail:wenxiaohong2007@163.com
作者简介:张慧杰(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为新生儿危重症急救与新生儿管理
基金资助:
安徽省科技攻关项目(1604a0802093)

Clinical trial and effect of Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure on early pulmonary function in preterm infants with mild respiratory distress syndrome

ZHANG Hui-jie, WEN Xiao-hong, HUANG Hui-zhi, PAN Jun-ping, SHEN Pei-ting, WU Wan-yun

Department of Pediatrics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230061,China

Received:2018-06-01 Revised:2018-08-22 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20
Contact: WEN Xiao-hong,E-mail:wenxiaohong2007@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)治疗早产儿轻度呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的临床疗效及对患儿早期肺功能的影响,为BiPAP应用于早产儿轻度RDS的治疗提供临床参考。方法选择2016年6月-2018年1月安徽医科大学第三附属医院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)收治的76例早产儿轻度RDS为观察对象,生后即予无创呼吸支持,随机分为BiPAP组(38例)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)组(38例),比较两组无创模式治疗早产儿RDS的治疗效果及对早期肺功能的影响情况。结果 1)与CPAP组比较,BiPAP组气管插管率明显降低(5.26% vs.26.32%,P<0.05),但平均无创通气时间、平均氧依赖时间、肺泡表面活性物质(PS)的重复应用、各种并发症的发生率、死亡率及平均住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2)早期潮气肺功能参数中,与CPAP组比较,BiPAP组呼吸频率明显降低[(42.98±4.26)次/min vs. (46.13±4.58)次/min]、潮气量明显升高[(6.50±1.29)ml/kg vs. (5.55±1.03)ml/kg]、每分通气量明显增加[(0.50±0.66)L/(min·kg) vs. (0.45±0.47)L/(min·kg)] (P<0.05),而达峰时间比、达峰容积比、呼气峰流速及75%、50%、25% 潮气量时呼气流速差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与CPAP相比,BiPAP治疗早产儿轻度RDS更加安全有效,同时可提高肺的顺应性,改善患儿早期肺功能。

关键词: 双水平气道正压通气, 持续气道正压通气, 呼吸窘迫综合征, 肺功能, 早产儿

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy and effect of Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure (BiPAP) on early pulmonary function in the treatment of premature infants with mild respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods Totally 76 preterm infants with mild RDS in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected as participants from June 2016 to January 2018 and given non-invasive ventilation after birth. The infants were randomly divided into BiPAP group(38 cases) and CPAP group (38 cases). The therapeutic effect and early pulmonary function of the two groups were compared. Results 1) The endotracheal intubation rate of the BiPAP group was significantly lower than that of the CPAP group(5.26% vs. 26.32%, P<0.05),but the average duration for noninvasive respiratory support ,the average time of complementary oxygen need, repeated application of pulmonary surfactant, other complications, the death rate and the average hospitalization days between the two groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). 2) The BiPAP group had significantly lower respiratory rate[(42.98±4.26)times/min vs. (46.13±4.58)times/min], higher tidal volume[(6.50±1.29)ml/kg vs. (5.55±1.03)ml/kg] and minute ventilation [(0.50±0.66)L/(min·kg) vs. (0.45±0.47)L/(min·kg)]( P<0.05), while the differences on the ratio of time to peak tidal expiratory flow to total expiratory time, ratio of volume to peak tidal expiratory flow to total expiratory volume, peak expiratory flow, and breathing flow at 75%, 50%, and 25% of tidal volume were not significant in both groups (P>0.05) . Conclusion Compared with CPAP, BiPAP is safer and more effective in the treatment of mild RDS in preterm infants, and can also improve lung compliance and early lung function in preterm infants with RDS.

Key words: Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure, continuous positive airway pressure, respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary function, preterm infants

中图分类号:

R222.6

张慧杰,温晓红,黄会芝,潘军平,沈佩婷,吴万云. 双水平气道正压通气在早产儿轻度呼吸窘迫综合征的应用及对早期肺功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(2): 197-201.

ZHANG Hui-jie, WEN Xiao-hong, HUANG Hui-zhi, PAN Jun-ping, SHEN Pei-ting, WU Wan-yun. Clinical trial and effect of Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure on early pulmonary function in preterm infants with mild respiratory distress syndrome[J]. journal1, 2019, 27(2): 197-201.

参考文献

[1] DiBlasi RM. Neonatal noninvasive ventilation techniques:do we really need to intubate? [J].Respiratory Care,2011,56(9):1295-1297.
[2] Jeon GW. Respiratory support with heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants [J]. Korean Pediatr,2016,59(10):389-394.
[3] Schmzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G,et al. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth:systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BMJ,2013,347:f5980.
[4] Fischer HS, Bührer C.Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia a meta-analysis [J]. Pediatrics,2013,132(5):e1351-e41360.
[5] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4 版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:395-397.
[6] Sadeghnia A, Barekateyn B, Badiei Z, et al. Analysis and comparison of the effects of N-BiPAP and in Bubble-CPAP treatment of preterm newborns with the weight of below 1500 grams affiliated with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomised clinical trial[J]. Adv Biomed Res,2016,5:3.
[7] Migliori C, Motta M, Angeli A, et al. Nasal bilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol,2005, 40(5):426-430.
[8] Salvo V, Lista G, Lupo E,et al.Noninvasive ventilation strategies for early treatment of RDS in preterm infants:an RCT [J]. Pediatrics,2015,135(3):444-451.
[9] 中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组肺功能协作组. 儿童肺功能系列指南(四):潮气呼吸肺功能[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2016, 31(21):1617-1621.
[10] Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome-2016 update[J]. Neonatology,2017,111:107-125.
[11] Rojas MA, Lozano JM, Rojas MX, et al. Very early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure:a randomized, controlled trial[J]. Pediatrics,2009, 123(1):137-142.
[12] Kieran EA, Walsh H, O′Donnell CPF. Survey of nasal continuous positive airways pressure(NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) use in Irish newborn nurseries [J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2011,96:F156.
[13] Morley SL. Non-invasive ventilation in paediatric critical care.[J]. Paediatr Respir Rev,2016,20:24-31.
[14] Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomised control trial[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2010, 95(2):85-89.
[15] O′ Brien K, Campbell C, Brown L, et al.Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP-NCPAP) vsinfant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants′≤1250 grams:a randomized controlled trial[J].BMC Pediatr,2012,12:43.
[16] 戴立英, 张健, 王琍琍. 双水平正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗中的应用[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2014,32(8):732-735.
[17] 林报忠, 郑通喜, 蒋波,等. 肺表面活性物质联合双水平气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2017,25(7):77-80.
[18] Aguiar T, Macedo I, Voutsen O, et al. Nasal bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants:a randomized controlled trial [J].Journal Clinical Trials,2015,5:3.
[19] Ricotti A, Salvo V, Zimmermann LJI, et al.N-SIPPV versus bi-level N-CPAP for early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants[J].Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2013,26(13):1346-1351.
[20] Mphil DMG, Mcur LW, Btech AA, et al. Lung function in African infants: a pilot study[J]. Pediatric Pulmonology,2015,50(1):49-54.
[21] Nguyen TT, Hoo AF, Lum S, et al. New reference equations to improve interpretation of infant lung function[J]. Pediatric Pulmonology,2013,48(4):370-380.
[22] Vrijlandt EJ, Kerstjens JM, Duiverman EJ, et al. Moderately preterm children have more respiratory problems during their first 5 years of life than children born full term[J]. Am J Pespir Crit Care Med,2013,187(11):1234-1240.
[23] 朱洪斌, 高彩云, 闫爱霞,等. nBiPAP和nCPAP治疗早产儿呼吸暂停疗效比较及对患儿肺功能和Gesell评分的影响[J]. 临床肺科杂志,2018,23(1):73-78.
[24] Ishihara C,Ibara S, Ohsone Y, et al. Effects of infant flow Bi-NCPAP on apnea of prematurity [J]. Pediatr Int,2016,58(6):456-460.
[25] Lampland AL, Plumm B, Worwa C, et al. Bi-level CPAP does not improve gas exchange when compared with conventional CPAP for the treatment of neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2015,100(1):F31-F34.

双水平气道正压通气在早产儿轻度呼吸窘迫综合征的应用及对早期肺功能的影响

Clinical trial and effect of Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure on early pulmonary function in preterm infants with mild respiratory distress syndrome

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张丹, 张军, 杨钰荣, 曹咪, 闫敬敏, 朱璐阳. 肠道菌群与早产儿脑发育及神经认知行为关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 756-759.
[2]	冯骁, 陈凌, 赵红缨, 黄蕊, 林辰曦, 庄丽娟. 不同脐带挤压方式对极早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 794-798.
[3]	郑亭玉, 张春宇, 杨飞, 郑芳, 张梦霞, 夏露萍, 徐孙超. 营养支持小组管理模式对早产儿生长发育及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 555-558.
[4]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[5]	李静兰, 孙文强, 朱雪萍. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良相关预测模型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 395-398.
[6]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[7]	任力, 黑明燕, 齐宇洁, 靳绯, 翁景文, 董世霄, 沈艳华, 姜敏. 早产儿喂养对坏死性小肠结肠炎发病的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 438-441.
[8]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[9]	王晶, 项思嘉, 鲁莹, 杨蕾, 胡小沙, 钱君, 池霞, 张敏. 早产儿3周岁体格生长及体成分分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 457-460.
[10]	郑水英, 罗艳赟. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床表现及相关影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 461-464.
[11]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[12]	何小颖, 吴翠玲, 曾玲艳, 綦美姣, 孙亚莲. 早产儿食物转换对血清营养素水平的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 81-85.
[13]	王慧冉, 罗荣, 胡文玲. 2019年3所妇幼保健院早产儿视网膜病变筛查及随访分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 105-108.
[14]	和娇吉, 刘孝美, 唐孟言, 罗红, 杨速飞, 彭文涛. 基于AIMS分析早产儿运动发育现状及影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(7): 779-782.
[15]	王成群, 徐海青, 汪鸿, 袁利, 周爱琴, 李明惠. 医护教家相结合养育照护促进高危早产儿发育的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 607-611.