早产儿使用肺表面活性物质拔管后应用不同通气模式呼吸支持的效果研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0850

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 813-816.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0850

早产儿使用肺表面活性物质拔管后应用不同通气模式呼吸支持的效果研究

李凌霄, 赵丹, 莫艳

广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院新生儿科,广西南宁 530000

收稿日期:2019-09-17 发布日期:2020-07-10 出版日期:2020-07-10
通讯作者: 赵丹,E-mail:myudxt@sohu.com
作者简介:李凌霄(1982-),男,广西人,主治医师,研究生学历,主要研究方向为新生儿重症监护。
基金资助:
广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z20170789)

Study on the effects of different ventilation modes on respiratory support for premature infants after extubation by pulmonary surfactant

LI Ling-xiao, ZHAO Dan, MO Yan

Neonatal Department,the Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning,Guangxi 530000,China

Received:2019-09-17 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-07-10
Contact: ZHAO Dan,E-mail:myudxt@sohu.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析不同通气模式在早产儿使用肺表面活性物质(PS)拔管后呼吸支持中的临床效果,为新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)患儿通气模式的选择提供参考依据。方法选取2017年3月—2019年3月期间广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院收治的早产患儿80例随机分为观察组和对照组,各40例。均给予气管插管-应用PS-拔出气管插管治疗。观察组给予同步鼻塞间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)呼吸支持,对照组给予经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)支持,比较两组患儿治疗期间血气指标、临床指标、有创呼吸支持率及并发症情况。结果观察组患儿通气1、12 h和24 h的二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、氧合指数(OI)均低于对照组,通气1 h、12 h的氧分压(PaO₂)高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗期间内有创呼吸支持率(20.00%)、并发症发生率(22.50%)低于对照组(52.50%、47.50%)(χ²=9.141、5.495,P<0.05);观察组患儿的有创通气时间、氧疗时间、住院时间均小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=5.821、41.681、3.924,P＜0.05)。结论与NCPAP相比,SNIPPV能够更有效地改善NRDS患儿的氧合情况,降低CO₂潴留,缩短通气支持时间、开奶时间、住院时间,还可以降低并发症的发生率。

关键词: 早产儿, 呼吸支持, 同步鼻塞间歇正压通气, 经鼻持续气道正压通气

Abstract: Objective To compare clinical effects of different ventilation modes on respiratory support for premature infants after extubation by pulmonary surfactant (PS). Methods A total of 80 premature infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) treated in the Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were enrolled from March 2017 to March 2019,and were divided into observation group(n=40) and control group(n=40) randomly.Both groups were given tracheal intubation,PS and pulling out tracheal intubation.The observation group was given synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) for respiratory support,while control group received nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for support.The blood gas indexes,clinical indexes,invasive respiratory support rate and complications during treatment were compared between the two groups. Results At 1 h,12 h and 24 h after ventilation,partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) and oxygenation index (OI) in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group(P<0.05).And at 1 h and 12 h after ventilation,oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05).Moreover,the invasive respiratory support rate and the incidence of complications in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group during treatment (20.00% vs.52.50%;22.50% vs.47.50%) (χ²=9.141,5.495,P＜0.05).The invasive ventilation time,oxygen therapy time and hospitalization time in observation group were all shorter than those in control group (t=5.821,41.681,3.924,P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with NCPAP,SNIPPV can more effectively improve oxygenation of NRDS children,reduce CO₂ retention,shorten ventilation support time,milking time,hospitalization time,and reduce incidence of complications.

Key words: premature infant, respiratory support, synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation, nasal continuous positive airway pressure

中图分类号:

R722.6

李凌霄, 赵丹, 莫艳. 早产儿使用肺表面活性物质拔管后应用不同通气模式呼吸支持的效果研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(7): 813-816.

LI Ling-xiao, ZHAO Dan, MO Yan. Study on the effects of different ventilation modes on respiratory support for premature infants after extubation by pulmonary surfactant[J]. journal1, 2020, 28(7): 813-816.

参考文献

[1] 钱文亚.外源性肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征研究进展[J].临床儿科杂志,2018,36(6):476-479.
[2] 李茂军,吴青,石伟,等.不同胎龄新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床特征分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2016,18(10):960-964.
[3] Mukerji A,Singh B,Helou S,et al.Use of noninvasive high-frequency ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit:a retrospective review[J].Am J Perinatol,2015,30(2):171-176.
[4] 李永富,杨晓路,马月兰,等.二种无创通气模式在早产儿呼吸衰竭中的应用[J].中国小儿急救医学,2016,23(4):236-239.
[5] 党嘉文,董文斌,雷小平,等.珂立苏联合鼻塞持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2018,34(9):1025-1028.
[6] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:395-398.
[7] 荣箫,周伟,赵小朋,等.微创肺表面活性物质治疗在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的疗效与安全性[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2018,33(14):1071-1074.
[8] Ciuffini F,Colnaghi M,Lavizzari A,et al.Therapy with high-flow nasal prongs in preterm infants[J].Pediatr Med Chir,2013,35(3):118-124.
[9] Yoder BA,Stoddard RA,Li M,et al.Heated,humidified hi gh-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates[J].Pediatricas,2013,131(5):e1482-e1490.
[10] Afjeh SA,Sabzehei MK,Shariati MK,et al.Evaluation of initial respiratory support strategies in VLBW neonates with RDS[J].Arch Ira Med,2017,20(3):158-164.
[11] Owens S,Erturk MA,Ouanes JPP,et al.Evaluation of epidural and peripheral nerve catheter heating during magnetic resonance imaging[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2014,39(6):534-539.
[12] Tahereh E,Fatemeh N,Roya T,et al.Comparison of complications and efficacy of NIPPV and nasal CPAP in preterm infants with RDS[J].Iran J Pediatr,2016,26(2):e2352.
[13] 李永富,杨晓路,马月兰,等.二种无创通气模式在早产儿呼吸衰竭中的应用[J].中国小儿急救医学,2016,23(4):236-239.
[14] Greenough A,Sharma A.What is new in ventilation strategies for the neonate?[J].Eur J Pediatr,2007,166(10):991-996.
[15] 岳冬梅,佟雅洁.不同通气方式联合肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较[J].中国小儿急救医学,2018,25(4):297-300.
[16] Lemyre B,Laughon M,Bose C,et al.Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants[J].Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2016,12(2):CD005384.

早产儿使用肺表面活性物质拔管后应用不同通气模式呼吸支持的效果研究

Study on the effects of different ventilation modes on respiratory support for premature infants after extubation by pulmonary surfactant

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张丹, 张军, 杨钰荣, 曹咪, 闫敬敏, 朱璐阳. 肠道菌群与早产儿脑发育及神经认知行为关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 756-759.
[2]	冯骁, 陈凌, 赵红缨, 黄蕊, 林辰曦, 庄丽娟. 不同脐带挤压方式对极早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 794-798.
[3]	郑亭玉, 张春宇, 杨飞, 郑芳, 张梦霞, 夏露萍, 徐孙超. 营养支持小组管理模式对早产儿生长发育及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 555-558.
[4]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[5]	李静兰, 孙文强, 朱雪萍. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良相关预测模型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 395-398.
[6]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[7]	任力, 黑明燕, 齐宇洁, 靳绯, 翁景文, 董世霄, 沈艳华, 姜敏. 早产儿喂养对坏死性小肠结肠炎发病的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 438-441.
[8]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[9]	王晶, 项思嘉, 鲁莹, 杨蕾, 胡小沙, 钱君, 池霞, 张敏. 早产儿3周岁体格生长及体成分分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 457-460.
[10]	郑水英, 罗艳赟. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床表现及相关影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 461-464.
[11]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[12]	何小颖, 吴翠玲, 曾玲艳, 綦美姣, 孙亚莲. 早产儿食物转换对血清营养素水平的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 81-85.
[13]	王慧冉, 罗荣, 胡文玲. 2019年3所妇幼保健院早产儿视网膜病变筛查及随访分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 105-108.
[14]	孙兴, 胡晓山, 刘凤, 刘蓓蓓. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 109-112.
[15]	和娇吉, 刘孝美, 唐孟言, 罗红, 杨速飞, 彭文涛. 基于AIMS分析早产儿运动发育现状及影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(7): 779-782.