1 Shanghai Mental Health Center,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200030,China;
2 Shanghai Jing'an District College of Education,Shanghai 200040,China;
3 Shanghai Pudong Education Development Institute,Shanghai 200120,China
Abstract：Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children (FFAS-C).Methods A total of 2 931 children aged 7~12 years old in Shanghai were selected and stratified by age and grade as the main variables.All children filled out FFAS-C,their parents completed the Family Function Device-the General Function (GF).FFAS-C was retested with the same procedure after 255 days of interval.Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of FFAS-C was 0.808,and the internal consistency reliability coefficient of each dimension was between 0.603 and 0.729.The Pearson correlation coefficient of each item and the total score was between 0.431 and 0.607 (P＜0.01).Spearman-Brown half confidence coefficient was 0.822,Guttman half confidence was 0.815,the retest correlation coefficient was 0.74 (P＜0.01).The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that FFAS-C could be divided into three factors,which were verified by confirmatory factor analysis.The high-score group of GF was higher than those of score group-low of GF in the total score and each dimension score of FFAS-C (P＜0.01).Conclusion The FFAS-C has good reliability and validity.
栾风焕,杜亚松,钟向阳,李梦瑶,周慧鸣,程永琛. 儿童用家庭功能评估量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(9): 868-867.
LUAN Feng-huan,DU Ya-song,ZHONG Xiang-yang,LI Meng-yao,ZHOU Hui-ming,CHENG Yong-chen. Validity and reliability of the Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children. journal1, 2017, 25(9): 868-867.
[1] 栾风焕,杜亚松.家庭功能评估量表的应用现状[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(12):1287-1289.
[2] Stratton P,Bland J,Janes E,et al.Developing an indicator of family function and a practicable outcome measure for systemic family and couple therapy:the SCORE[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2010,32(3):232-258.
[3] Cahill P,O'Reilly K,Carr A,et al.Validation of a 28-item version of the Systemic Clinical Outcome and Routine Evaluation in an Irish context:the SCORE-28[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2010,32(3):210-231.
[4] Vila a M,Silva JTD,Relvas AP,et al.Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation:SCORE-15[J].Avalia o Familiar:Funcinamentoe Interven o,2014,1(1):23-41.
[5] Hamilton E,Carr A.Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures[J].Family Process,2015,15(1):1-14.
[6] Jewell T,Carr A,Stratton P,et al.Development of a children's version of the SCORE index of family function and change[J].Family Process,2013,52(4):673-684.
[7] Byles J,Byrne C,Boyle MH,et al.Ontario child health study:reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device[J].Family Process,1988,27(1):97-104.
[8] Mansfield AK,Keitner GI,Dealy J.The family assessment device:An update[J].Family Process,2015,54(1):82-93.
[9] Stevens J.Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences[M]// Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences/Routledge,2009:68-69.
[10] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析务实:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[11] 吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[12] O'Hanrahan K,White MD,Carr A,et al.Validation of 28 and 15 item versions of the SCORE family assessment questionnaire with adult mental health service users[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2016,1-17.
[13] Fay D,Carr A,O'reilly K,et al.Irish norms for the SCORE-15 and 28 from a national telephone survey[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2013,35(1):24-42.
