2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-20

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 931-930.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-20

2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较

陈小燕¹,吴婕翎¹,李明²,刘文博²,邹小兵³

1 广东省妇幼保健院,广东广州 511400;
2 中山大学-卡内基梅隆大学联合工程学院,广东广州 528300;
3 中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心,广东广州 510630

收稿日期:2017-02-10 发布日期:2017-09-10 出版日期:2017-09-10
通讯作者: 邹小兵,E-mail:zouxb@163.com
作者简介:陈小燕(1991-),女,福建人,住院医师,硕士学位,主要研究方向为儿童发育行为儿科学
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划 (973计划)项目 (2012CB517901)

Comparison of response to name between autism spectrum disorder children and healty children aged 2~3 years old

CHEN Xiao-yan¹,WU Jie-ling¹,LI Ming²,LIU Wen-bo²,ZOU Xiao-bing³

1 Guangdong Women and Children Hospital,Guangzhou,Guangdong 511400,China;
2 SYSU-CMU joint Institute of Engineering,Guangzhou,Guangdong 528300,China;
3 Children Development & Behavioral Center,the Third Affiliated Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510630,China

Received:2017-02-10 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10
Contact: ZOU Xiao-bing,E-mail:zouxb@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和正常儿童间叫名反应的客观量化的指标差异。方法纳入2016年5-8月在中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心确诊的2～3岁ASD儿童22名,正常儿童21名。在多模态实验室中进行标准流程叫名反应,通过评估师打分和计算机自动分析系统分析在正常情景反应下两组儿童的叫名反应的特征和差异。结果 1)ASD组与正常组儿童的叫名反应评分比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=15.764,P＜0.01)。2)对比计算机自动分析叫名反应的反应时间和持续时间,ASD和正常组在反应时间上的差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.593,P=0.113),ASD的持续时间短于正常组儿童,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.4,P=0.001)。结论 2~3岁ASD儿童的叫名反应差于正常儿童,ASD儿童早期叫名反应的异常症状表现为目光对视更少和持续时间更短。

关键词: 叫名反应, 孤独症谱系障碍, 客观化

Abstract: Objective To explore the objectivity differences of responses to name between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and children with normal development.Method A total of 22 ASD children diagnosed in Children Development & Behavioral Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University from May to August in 2016 and 21 controls was enrolled in this study.In standard procedure testing the response to name.After that,two professional evaluators scored the response to name,and automatic system computational analyzed the time of response to name and duration to response.Result 1)There were no significant differences in scores of response to name between ASD children and normal children (Z=15.764,P＜0.01).2)The computational analysis showed that in response to name procedure,the response time showed no differences in ASD group and control group (Z=-1.593,P=0.113),But response duration was shorter in ASD group than that in control group(Z=-3.4,P=0.001).Conclusions Compared to normal children,2~3-year-old children with ASD have inferior behavior in response to name.The characteristics of abnormal response to name in ASD children include less eye contact and shorter response duration.

Key words: responses to name, autism spectrum disorder, objectivity

中图分类号:

R179

陈小燕,吴婕翎,李明,刘文博,邹小兵. 2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(9): 931-930.

CHEN Xiao-yan,WU Jie-ling,LI Ming,LIU Wen-bo,ZOU Xiao-bing. Comparison of response to name between autism spectrum disorder children and healty children aged 2~3 years old[J]. journal1, 2017, 25(9): 931-930.

参考文献

[1] Wan MW,Green J,Elsabbagh M,et al.Quality of interaction between at risk infants and caregiver at 12-15 months is associated with 3-year autism outcome[J].Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2013,7:763-771.
[2] Dawson G,Toth K,Abbott R,et al.Early social attention impairments in autism:social orienting,joint attention,and attention to distress[J].Developmental Psychology,2004,40(2):271-283.
[3] Chawarska K,Macari S,Powell K,et al.Enhanced social attention in female infant siblings at risk for autism[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,2015,55(3):188-195.
[4] Abruzzo PM,Ghezzo A,Bolotta A,et al.Perspective biological markers for autism spectrum disorders:Advantages of the use of receiver operating characteristic curves in evaluating marker sensitivity and specificity[J].Disease Markers,2015,329607.doi:10.1155/2015/329607
[5] 王吉,梁亚勇,唐春,等.婴幼儿孤独症的早期预警信号[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2017,25(3):234-237.
[6] Bidwell J,Essa IA,Rozga A,et al.Measuring child visual attention using markerless head tracking from color and depth sensing cameras[M].//Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction-ICMI'14.New York,USA:ACM Press,2014:447-454.
[7] Lord C,Risi S,Lambrecht L,et al.The Autism Diagnostic Schedule - Generic:A standard measures of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism[J].Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,2000,30(3):205-223.
[8] Kondolot M,zmert EN,ztop DB,et al.The modified checklist for autism in Turkish toddlers:A different cultural adaptation sample[J].Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,2016,21:121-127.
[9] De Giacomo A,Craig F,Cristella A,et al.Can PEP-3 provide a cognitive profile in children with ASD? A comparison between the developmental ages of PEP-3 and IQ of Leiter-R[J].Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,2016,29(6):566-573.
[10] Nadig AS,Ozonoff S,Young GS,et al.A prospective study of response to name in infants at risk for autism[J].Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine,2007,161(4):378-383.
[11] Ozonoff S,Iosif AM,Baguio F,et al.A prospective study of the emergence of early behavioral signs of autism[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,2010,49(3):256-266.
[12] Gabrielsen TP,Farley M,Speer L,et al.Identifying autism in a brief observation[J].Pediatrics,2015,135(2):e330-e338.
[13] Zappella M,Einspieler C,Bartl-Pokorny KD,et al.What do home videos tell us about early motor and socio-communicative behaviours in children with autistic features during the second year of life-An exploratory study[J].Early Human Development,2015,91(10):569-575.
[14] Palomo R,Carmona MB,Ozonoff S.Autism and family home movies:A comprehensive review[J].Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,2006,27(Suppl 2):59-68.
[15] Chawarska K,Macari S,Shic F.Decreased spontaneous attention to social scenes in[J].Biological Psychiatry,2013,74(3):195-203.
[16] Chawarska K,Ye S,Shic F,et al.Multilevel differences in spontaneous social attention in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder[J].Child Development,2016,87(2):543-557.
[17] Chita-Tegmark M.Social attention in ASD:A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities,2015,48:79-93.
[18] Thorup E,Nystr m P,Gredeb ck G,et al.Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism:an eye tracking study[J].Molecular Autism,2016,7(1):12.
[19] Muskett T,Body R,Muskett TOM,et al.The case for multimodal analysis of atypical interaction:Questions,answers and gaze in play involving a child with autism[J].Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,2013,27(10-11):837.
[20] Fusaro VA,Daniels J,Duda M,et al.The potential of accelerating early detection of autism through content analysis of youtube videos[J].PLoS ONE,2014,9(4):1-6.

2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较

Comparison of response to name between autism spectrum disorder children and healty children aged 2~3 years old

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张超. 早期介入丹佛模式在不同病情程度孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复中的应用研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 736-740.
[2]	刘安南, 姜志梅. 孤独症谱系障碍各年龄段筛查工具研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 645-649.
[3]	黎梦晗, 李廷玉. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童感觉异常的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 650-655.
[4]	刘梦姣, 郑小琴, 孟仙, 吴晓玲, 葛冬梅, 聂晶. 2~5岁孤独症谱系障碍、疑似孤独症谱系障碍及全面发育迟缓儿童的智能特征分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 668-673.
[5]	李德欣, 陈强, 庄志成, 陈红, 杨秉娇, 姜顺香, 周翔. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童肠道菌群与症状严重程度相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 497-501.
[6]	王少雯, 张贻霞, 陈静静, 魏秀丽, 叶蓓, 方拴锋. Gesell发展诊断量表在语言相关的发育性疾病中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 442-445.
[7]	柯晓燕. 孤独症谱系障碍早期识别与早期诊断的现状与挑战[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 238-240.
[8]	宋超, 胡莉菲, 吴玲玲, 江忠权. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童合并智力功能缺陷的GBM预测模型构建与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 241-245.
[9]	李正, 肖贵元, 罗雅婷, 何春燕, 王念蓉, 赵妍. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童血清叶酸、维生素B12水平与肠道菌群的关联[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 246-251.
[10]	董海鹏, 杨思渊, 李伟栋, 余婧. 团体社交训练对孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复效果的影响因素及Nomogram预测模型构建[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 252-258.
[11]	赵丽华, 李晶. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童非典型人际同步表现及其神经机制[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 274-278.
[12]	赵英欣, 何凡, 郑毅. 肠道微生物干预在孤独症谱系障碍中的应用展望[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 279-283.
[13]	王静, 黄珊, 高雪婷. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童室内替代座椅干预研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 284-288.
[14]	林欢喜, 刘潘婷, 童梅玲, 池霞, 钱君, 洪琴. 父母介导的干预在孤独症谱系障碍治疗中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 304-310.
[15]	易爱文, 辛晶, 白艳, 许嘉欣, 梁福鑑, 冯小键. 脑电频谱特征分析在孤独症谱系障碍儿童早期诊断及康复干预评价中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 311-315.