欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 85-90.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2025.01.010

• 药物治疗学 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞在胰管结石体外震波碎石术中的应用

王玥,程勇,陶海勇,何晓晔,胡柳昕,解小艺,郭建荣   

  1. 上海市浦东新区公利医院麻醉科,上海  200135
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-28 修回日期:2024-07-30 出版日期:2025-01-26 发布日期:2025-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 程勇,男,硕士,副主任医师,硕士生导师,研究方向:可视化技术在麻醉领域的应用。 E-mail:msof2000@126.com
  • 作者简介:王玥,女,硕士,主治医师,研究方向:可视化技术在麻醉领域的应用。 E-mail:hsfxwangy@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生健康委员会卫生科技面上项目(PW2021A-58);上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点学科群建设项目(PWZxq2022-05);海军军医大学附属公利医院青年基金资助计划项目(2022YQNJJ-05)

Application of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones

WANG Yue, CHENG Yong, TAO Haiyong, HE Xiaoye, HU Liuxin, XIE Xiaoyi, GUO Jianrong   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Gongli Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area, Shanghai 200135, China
  • Received:2024-06-28 Revised:2024-07-30 Online:2025-01-26 Published:2025-01-02

摘要:

目的:评价超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)联合少阿片麻醉方案在胰管结石体外震波碎石术(ESWL)中的应用价值。方法:选取2022年3月至2023年4月于本院择期行胰管结石体外震波碎石术患者96例,男60例,女36例,年龄20~65岁,ASA I~II级,BMI 16~30 kg/m2。将患者随机分为常规静脉麻醉组(C组,48例)和ESPB+少阿片组(E组,48例)。C组患者接受保留自主呼吸的丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼靶控输注静脉全麻;E组患者在静脉全麻前接受超声引导下双侧ESPB。观察并记录两组血流动力学指标[心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)]的变化;观察两组麻醉效果、瑞芬太尼用量、麻醉恢复质量、术后镇痛效果及围术期不良反应(呼吸抑制、恶心呕吐、皮肤瘙痒等)发生率。结果:与C组比较,E组术中呼吸抑制发生率降低、术中瑞芬太尼用量减少、术后苏醒时间缩短(P<0.05);E组术后静息及咳嗽疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及术后恶心呕吐发生率显著低于C组(P<0.05)。两组患者术中、术后的HR及MAP无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:超声引导ESPB用于胰管结石ESWL效果满意,俭省阿片类药且并发症少。

关键词: 超声引导, 竖脊肌平面阻滞, 静脉全麻, 少阿片, 胰管结石, 体外震波碎石术

Abstract:

AIM: To evaluate the value of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) combined with opioid-sparing anaesthesia in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for pancreatic stones. METHODS: A total of 96 patients (60 males and 36 females, aged 20-65 years, ASA I-II, BMI 16-30 kg/m2) undergoing elective extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones were selected in our hospital from March 2022 to April 2023. The patients were randomly divided into conventional intravenous anesthesia group (group C, 48 cases) and ESPB+ opioid-sparing group (group E, 48 cases). Patients in group C underwent general anesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil with spontaneous breathing. Patients in group E underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB before intravenous general anesthesia. The changes of hemodynamic indexes (HR, MAP) in the two groups were observed and recorded. The anesthetic effect, dosage of remifentanil, quality of anesthesia recovery, postoperative analgesic effect and incidence of perioperative adverse reactions (respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, etc.) were observed in the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with group C, the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression was significantly decreased, the intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was decreased, and the postoperative recovery time was shortened in group E (P<0.05). The VAS scores of rest and cough pain and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly decreased in group E (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in HR and MAP between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ESPB in ESWL for pancreatic duct stones is satisfactory and can save opioids with few complications.

Key words: ultrasonic guidance, erector spinae plane block, intravenous general anesthesia, opioid-sparing, pancreatic stone, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

中图分类号: