综合性干预对孤独症谱系障碍儿童影响的追踪研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-1400

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 969-974.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-1400

综合性干预对孤独症谱系障碍儿童影响的追踪研究

张婷¹, 邵智^1,2, 阳光², 陶洪梅^1,2, 彭帅¹, 张雅如^1,2, 王艺¹, 彭元琴¹

1.重庆市第九人民医院重庆市儿童孤独症康复治疗中心,重庆 400700;
2.重庆市精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心

收稿日期:2022-12-28 修回日期:2023-04-21 发布日期:2023-08-31 出版日期:2023-09-10
通讯作者: 邵智,E-mail:779405151@qq.com
作者简介:张婷(1982-),女,四川人,副教授,博士学位,主要研究方向为执行功能的发展认知神经机制、心灵解读与孤独症儿童社会功能康复干预。
基金资助:
重庆英才·创新领军人才项目(CQYC20200303136);重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项(cstc2020jscx-msxm1039)

Follow-up study on the effects of comprehensive intervention on children with autism spectrum disorder

ZHANG Ting¹, SHAO Zhi^1,2, YANG Guang², TAO Hongmei^1,2, PENG Shuai¹, ZHANG Yaru^1,2, WANG Yi¹, PENG Yuanqin¹

1. The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing Rehabilitation and Treatment Center for Children with ASD, Chongqing 400700, China;
2. Medical Research Center for Mental Psychological Disorders of Chongqing

Received:2022-12-28 Revised:2023-04-21 Online:2023-09-10 Published:2023-08-31
Contact: SHAO Zhi, E-mail:779405151@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的追踪通过综合性干预且临床症状和社会适应能力有显著改善的孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童,在干预撤销1年后,其临床症状、语言能力、社会生活适应能力、社会交往能力和心灵解读(ToM)技能的变化情况。方法选取重庆市儿童孤独症康复治疗中心2015—2020年确诊的35例ASD儿童和35名典型发育儿童参与研究,ASD儿童干预时年龄在3~7岁之间,平均(4.60±1.14)岁。ASD组在干预前(T1)、干预结束时(T2)和干预结束1年后(T3)分别接受儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)、心理教育量表第三版(PEP-3)、韦氏智力量表第四版(WPPSI-Ⅳ)、婴儿-初中生社会生活适应量表(S-M)、社交反应量表(SRS)和心灵解读任务测试(ToM任务测试);典型发育儿童接受WPPSI-Ⅳ、SRS和ToM任务测试。结果综合性干预对ASD儿童的临床症状、社会生活适应能力和言语智力发展都有显著改善作用;和T2相比,ASD患儿T3的CARS得分无显著变化;ASD组SRS和ToM能力都显著低于典型发育组;T2、T3的CARS得分和T3的WPPSI-Ⅳ智商能显著预测ASD患儿T3的ToM;T2的S-M量表得分能显著预测ASD患儿T3的SRS得分。结论 ASD患儿经综合性干预,在临床症状和社会适应能力上所获得的各项进步在干预撤销后会保持稳定。ASD儿童ToM和社交能力的发展受不同心理能力的影响。

关键词: 孤独症谱系障碍, 综合性干预, 追踪研究

Abstract: Objective To analyze the changes in clinical symptoms, language ability, social adaptation, social communication, and Theory of Mind (ToM) skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) for 1 year after intervention cessation, who have already finished comprehensive intervention and had improved clinical symptoms and social adaptation. Methods Thirty-five children with ASD diagnosed in Chongqing Rehabilitation and Treatment Center for Children with ASD from 2015 to 2020 were selected in this study, and 35 typically developed children were enrolled. ASD children were 3 to 7 years old when receiving intervention, with an average age of (4.60±1.14) years old. ASD children were assessed at pre-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2), and 1 year after the end of the intervention (T3) by the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Psycho-Educational Profile, 3rd edition (PEP-3), Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 4th edition (WPPSI-Ⅳ), Normal Development of Social Skills from Infant to Junior High School Children(S-M), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and ToM task, while the typically developed children received assessment by WPPSI-Ⅳ, SRS and ToM task. Results Comprehensive intervention significantly improved clinical symptoms, social adaptation and language development of ASD children. There was no significant change in CARS scores between T2 and T3. Children with ASD showed significantly lower SRS score and ToM abilities compared to the typically developed children. CARS scores at T2 and T3, as well as WPPSI-Ⅳ intelligence quotient at T3 significantly predicted ToM ability of ASD children at T3. S-M score at T2 significantly predicted SRS score of ASD children at T3. Conclusions The improvements in clinical symptoms and social adaptation that ASD children gained with comprehensive interventions remain stable after the intervention is withdrawn. The development of ToM and social communication abilities in ASD children is influenced by different psychological abilities.

Key words: autism spectrum disorder, comprehensive intervention, follow-up study

中图分类号:

R749.94

张婷, 邵智, 阳光, 陶洪梅, 彭帅, 张雅如, 王艺, 彭元琴. 综合性干预对孤独症谱系障碍儿童影响的追踪研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 969-974.

ZHANG Ting, SHAO Zhi, YANG Guang, TAO Hongmei, PENG Shuai, ZHANG Yaru, WANG Yi, PENG Yuanqin. Follow-up study on the effects of comprehensive intervention on children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2023, 31(9): 969-974.

参考文献

[1] Greg P. The value of early intervention for children with autism[J].Paediatrics and Child Health,2018,28(8):364-367.
[2] 邹小兵.孤独症谱系障碍干预原则与BSR模式[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(1):1-6.
Zhou XB. Intervention principles for children with autism and BSR model[J].Chin J Child Health Care, 2019,27(1):1-6.(in Chinese)
[3] 杨玉凤. 创建适合我国儿童孤独症谱系障碍的评估工具和干预方法[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(1):1-2.
Yang YF.To create assessment tools and intervention methods suitable for Chinese children with autism spectrum disorders[J].Chin J Child Health Care,28(1):1-2.(in Chinese)
[4] 静进, 王馨. 孤独症谱系障碍的多学科合作研究与干预[J].中国实用儿科杂志, 2019, 34(8): 628-632.
Jing J,Wang X. Multidisciplinary collaborative research and intervention in autism spectrum disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics,2019, 34(8): 628-632.(in Chinese)
[5] 马晨欢, 王瑜. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童的早期干预方法研究进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2020,28(1): 57-60.
Ma CH,Wang Y. Research progress of early intervention methods for children with autism spectrum disorder[J].Chin J Child Health Care,2020, 28(1): 57-60.(in Chinese)
[6] Andreou M, Skrimpa V. Theory of Mind deficits and neurophysiological operations in autism spectrum disorders: A review[J]. Brain Sci, 2020,20,10(6):393.
[7] Lombardo MV, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S. Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum[J].Mol Psychiatry, 2019,24(10):1435-1450.
[8] 杨玉凤.儿童发育行为心理评定量表[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2016.
[9] Breidbord J, Croudace T J. Reliability generalization for Childhood Autism Rating Scale[J]. J Autism Dev Disord,2013,43(12):2855-2865.
[10] Perry A, Condillac R A, Freeman N L, et al. Multi-site study of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) in five clinical groups of young children[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2005, 35: 625-634.
[11] 李改智,曹晓华,张克让,等.孤独症谱系障碍功能评估工具的临床应用分析[J].中华诊断学电子杂志, 2021, 9(3):3.
Li GZ, Cao XH, Zhang KR.et al. Clinical application analysis of functional assessment tools for autism spectrum disorder[J]. Chin J Diagnostics(Electronic Edition) ,2021, 9(3):3.(in Chinese)
[12] 龚耀先,戴晓阳.中国-韦氏幼儿智力量表(C-WYCSI)的编制[J].心理学报, 1988, 20(4):30-42.
Gong YX, Dai XY. China-Wechsler young children scale of intelligence(C-WYSSI) [J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,1988, 20(4):30-42.(in Chinese)
[13] 陈亮亮, 舒艳, 刘欣, 等.社交反应量表简版在中国孤独症儿童中的适用性研究[J].教育生物学杂志, 2019, 7(2): 80.
Chen LL,Shu Y.Liu X.et al.The applicability of the short version of the Social Response Scale to autistic children in China[J]. J Educational Biology,2019, 7(2): 80.(in Chinese)
[14] Zhang T, Zhi S, Zhang Y . Developmental steps in theory of mind of typical Chinese children and Chinese children with autism spectrum disorder[J].Res Autism Spect Dis, 2016, 23:210-220.
[15] Wellman HM . Developing a theory of Mind[M]//The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development.2nd edition. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[16] 邵智,Grace Hao.儿童自闭症康复治疗学[M].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2019:5-10.
[17] Wong C, Odom SL, Hume KA, et al. Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2015,45(7):1951-1966.
[18] Jones CRG, Simonoff E, Baird G, et al. The association between theory of mind, executive function, and the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder[J]. Autism Res, 2018, 11(1):95-109.
[19] Hoogenhout M, Malcolm-Smith S. Theory of mind predicts severity level in autism[J]. Autism, 2017,21(2):242-252.
[20] Yuk V, Urbain C, Pang EW, et al. Do you know what I'm thinking? Temporal and spatial brain activity during a theory-of-mind task in children with autism[J]. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 2018,34:139-147.
[21] 刘涛,刘星辰. fNIRS在自闭症脑功能研究中的应用与展望[J].心理科学,2017, 40(4): 1005-1010.
Liu T, Liu XC. Functional near-infratrd spectroscopy studies on social deficits in children with autism[J]. Psychological Science, 2017, 40(4): 1005-1010.(in Chinese)
[22] Mazza M, Mariano M, Peretti S, et al. The role of theory of mind on social information processing in children with autism spectrum disorders: A mediation analysis[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2017, 47(5): 1369-1379.
[23] Mazza M, Mariano M, Peretti S, et al. The role of theory of mind on social information processing in children with autism spectrum disorders: A mediation analysis[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2017,47(5):1369-1379.
[24] 齐军慧,刘靖,李雪,等.孤独症儿童社会交往能力发展与执行功能和心理推理能力的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(3):219-224.
Qi JH, Liu J, Li X, et al. Relationship between development of social skill and executive function and theory of mind in children and adolescents with autism[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2017,31(3): 219-224.(in Chinese)
[25] Livingston LA, Colvert E, Social Relationships Study Team, et al. Good social skills despite poor theory of mind:Exploring compensation in autism spectrum disorder[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2019,60(1):102-110.
[26] Holopainen A, de Veld DMJ, Hoddenbach E, et al. Does theory of mind training enhance empathy in autism[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2019,49(10):3965-3972.
[27] Szumski G, Smogorzewska J, Grygiel P, et al. Examining the effectiveness of naturalistic social skills training in developing social skills and theory of mind in preschoolers with ASD[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2019,49(7):2822-2837.

综合性干预对孤独症谱系障碍儿童影响的追踪研究

Follow-up study on the effects of comprehensive intervention on children with autism spectrum disorder

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	静进. 孤独症谱系障碍的治疗干预现状与建议[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 939-944.
[2]	李亦诚, 张媛媛, 霍言言, 吴丹, 马玲, 仇晓艳, 马晨欢, 王健, 罗洁鸣, 李天舒, 徐敬, 周洁, 孙婷婷, 沈红英, 徐蕾, 王瑜, 陈津津. 应用移动端开展孤独症谱系障碍居家早期筛查的初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 963-968.
[3]	李想, 范莉莉. 孤独症谱系障碍感觉特征相关研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 1000-1004.
[4]	陈碧媛, 邹小兵, 柯晓燕, 梁凤晶, 肖湘, 游聪, 陈凯云, 邓红珠. 2~9岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童WHO-CST干预中国实施方案[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(8): 913-919.
[5]	张超. 早期介入丹佛模式在不同病情程度孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复中的应用研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 736-740.
[6]	刘安南, 姜志梅. 孤独症谱系障碍各年龄段筛查工具研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 645-649.
[7]	黎梦晗, 李廷玉. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童感觉异常的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 650-655.
[8]	刘梦姣, 郑小琴, 孟仙, 吴晓玲, 葛冬梅, 聂晶. 2~5岁孤独症谱系障碍、疑似孤独症谱系障碍及全面发育迟缓儿童的智能特征分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 668-673.
[9]	李德欣, 陈强, 庄志成, 陈红, 杨秉娇, 姜顺香, 周翔. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童肠道菌群与症状严重程度相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 497-501.
[10]	王少雯, 张贻霞, 陈静静, 魏秀丽, 叶蓓, 方拴锋. Gesell发展诊断量表在语言相关的发育性疾病中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 442-445.
[11]	柯晓燕. 孤独症谱系障碍早期识别与早期诊断的现状与挑战[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 238-240.
[12]	宋超, 胡莉菲, 吴玲玲, 江忠权. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童合并智力功能缺陷的GBM预测模型构建与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 241-245.
[13]	李正, 肖贵元, 罗雅婷, 何春燕, 王念蓉, 赵妍. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童血清叶酸、维生素B12水平与肠道菌群的关联[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 246-251.
[14]	董海鹏, 杨思渊, 李伟栋, 余婧. 团体社交训练对孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复效果的影响因素及Nomogram预测模型构建[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 252-258.
[15]	赵丽华, 李晶. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童非典型人际同步表现及其神经机制[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 274-278.