角色理论视域下我国托育教师专业身份重构研究*——基于新加坡2023版《婴幼儿培育框架》的启示

刘海, 颜绍英

教育与教学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 86-100.

PDF(2552 KB)
PDF(2552 KB)
教育与教学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 86-100.
教师教育

角色理论视域下我国托育教师专业身份重构研究*——基于新加坡2023版《婴幼儿培育框架》的启示

  • 刘海, 颜绍英
作者信息 +

A Study on the Reconstruction of the Professional Identity ofEarly Childhood Educators in China from the Perspective of Role Theory—Insights from Singapore′s Early Years Development Framework(EYDF 2023)

  • Liu Hai, Yan Shaoying
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

近年来,我国逐步构建了托育服务发展框架,为托育教师的专业成长指明了方向。然而,托育教师角色建构层面的系统性支持仍显不足,托育教师的专业角色定位不明与身份认同受限是制约我国托育服务质量提升的重要原因,其深层症结在于教师角色期望模糊、专业赋能缺失、反思机制薄弱与家园协同不足。角色理论视域下,基于新加坡2023版《婴幼儿培育框架》的“深思熟虑的规划者—积极回应的引导者—反思性实践者—协作的伙伴”整合角色模型,结合中国教育实践,可以系统构建我国托幼课程规划、教学实施、专业反思与家园协同联动的动态体系。重构我国托育教师专业角色的四条路径为:明晰角色期望,构建发展适宜性的教师角色标准体系;化解“引导—自主”的角色张力,建立以观察为核心的专业赋能体系;内化角色认同,培育嵌入实践的批判性反思共同体;确立协同者角色与系统功能,构建“家—园—社”制度化协同支持生态。

Abstract

In recent years,China has gradually established an institutional framework for the development of childcare services,providing cleardirections for the professional growth of teachers.However,systematic supportfor the role construction of childcare teachers in China remains inadequate.Theunclear definition of professional roles and the constrained professional identity of early childhood educators are significant factors undermining the qualityof early childhood education and care services in China.The underlying issuesstem from ambiguous role expectations, a lack of professional empowerment,weakmechanisms for reflection,and insufficient family-kindergarten collaboration. This study,grounded in role theory,examines the integrated role model presentedin Singapore′s Early Years Development Framework(EYDF 2023),which conceptualizes the educator as a ″thoughtful planner-responsive facilitator-reflective practitioner-collaborative partner″.By connecting this model with the realitiesof Chinese educational practice,this article systematically constructs a dynamicsystem linking curriculum planning,instructional implementation,professional reflection,and family-kindergarten collaboration within the Chinese context.Based on this analysis,the article proposes four pathways for reconstructing the professional role of early childhood educators in China:clarifying role expectations to establish a developmentally appropriate system of teacher role standards;resolving the ″guidance-autonomy″ role tension,building a system of professional empowerment centered on observation;internalizing role identity,fosteringa community of critical reflection embedded in practice;and formalizing the role of collaborator and systemic functions to establish an institutionalized,collaborative support ecosystem involving families,kindergartens,and the community.

关键词

托育教师 / 角色理论 / 角色重构 / 角色认同 / 《婴幼儿培育框架》

Key words

early childhood educators / role theory / role reconstruction / role identity / Early Years Development Framework(EYDF 2023)

引用本文

导出引用
刘海, 颜绍英. 角色理论视域下我国托育教师专业身份重构研究*——基于新加坡2023版《婴幼儿培育框架》的启示[J]. 教育与教学研究. 2026, 40(7): 86-100
Liu Hai, Yan Shaoying. A Study on the Reconstruction of the Professional Identity ofEarly Childhood Educators in China from the Perspective of Role Theory—Insights from Singapore′s Early Years Development Framework(EYDF 2023)[J]. Education and Teaching Research. 2026, 40(7): 86-100
中图分类号: G615   

参考文献

[1] 洪秀敏,张明珠,朱文婷.当前我国托育人员队伍建设的瓶颈与对策[J].中国教师,2020(2):79-83.
[2] 李青贞. 0-3岁婴幼儿托育教师职业认同研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2022.
[3] 黄佳仪.我国托育教师角色责任问题研究[D].信阳:信阳师范大学,2024.
[4] Hindin M J.Role theory[C]//Ritzer G,Ryan J M,Thorn B,et al.The blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.Oxford,UK:Blackwell Publishing,2007:3959-3962.
[5] Bidde B J.Recent developments in role theory[J].Annual Review ofSociology,1986(12):67-92.
[6] Early Childhood Development Agency.Early years development framework2023[EB/OL].https://www.ecda.gov.sg/early-childhood-educators-(ece)/curriculum-frameworks/early-years-development-framework.
[7] Lim C.Singaporean educators′ reflections about their role and practices in the education and care of infants[J].Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education,2019,40(2):74-95.
[8] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗:在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[R/OL].(2022-10-25)[2025-07-27].http://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2022-10/25/content-5721685.htm.
[9] 杜威 J.民主主义与教育[M].王承绪,译.北京:人民教育出版社,2001:51-52.
[10] 谭乐.脑机革命[M].周先武,赵梦瑶,倪雪琪,等译.北京:中信出版集团,2021:36-37.
[11] 李姗泽,方银叶.以儿童之家为依托的社区婴幼儿照护服务体系构建[J].教育与教学研究,2022,36(6):1-15.
[12] 王声平,杨晓萍.幼儿教师专业身份认同的困惑及其重塑[J].教育与教学研究,2011,25(1):1-4,11.
[13] 原左晔,尚瑞茜.终身学习时代的教师角色转变:逻辑向度与实现进路[J].终身教育研究,2024,35(1):25-32,65.
[14] 邓昌杰,胥兴春.基于“他者镜像"与“自我认同”之维建构幼儿教师身份认同的可行性分析[J].教育与教学研究,2016,30(7):46-50.
[15] 索成林.提高幼儿教师专业素养的基本策略[J].教育理论与实践,2016,36(8):37-38.
[16] 杨莉君,汪鑫鑫.托育教师核心素养的构成要素及其生成路径研究[J].教师教育研究,2022,34(5):116-123.
[17] Mclaughlin T,Cherrington S.Creating a rich curriculum through intentional teaching[J].Early Childhood Folio,2018,22(1):33-38.
[18] Bentzen W R.Seeing young children:a guide to observing and recording behavior[M].5th ed.Clifton Park,NY:Thomson Delmar Learning,2005:16.
[19] 刘岸英.反思型教师与教师专业发展:对反思发展教师专业功能的思考[J].教育科学,2003(4):40-42.
[20] 卢真金.反思性实践是教师专业发展的重要举措[J].比较教育研究,2001(5):53-59.
[21] Lieberman A,Pointer Mace D H.Teacher Learning:the key to educational reform[J].Journal of Teacher Education,2008,59(3):226-234.
[22] 陈佳.家校社协同背景下社区育人的价值、问题与路径[J].教育观察,2024,13(6):91-92,113.
[23] 但菲,张德佳,索长清.重视并提高托育过程质量:OECD的建议及其启示[J].学前教育研究,2022(12):11-21.
[24] 黄振中,李曼丽.基于专业标准的儿童早期发展保教师及其核心知识能力框架研究[J].教育学报,2019,15(6):82-92.
[25] 吴桢映.“托幼一体化"背景下的家、园、社共育实践探索[J].人民教育,2023(22):77-78.
[26] 武茜璇.教师参与校家社协同育人的角色困境及其纾解策略[J].教学与管理,2025(31):18-21.
[27] 张颖,赵凡奇.民族地区幼儿园教师的身份认同:基于86名教师成长故事的Nvivo 12.0分析[J].教育与教学研究,2025,39(3):106-118.

基金

*四川省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地四川学前教育发展研究中心科研项目课题“托育教师专业角色定位的国际经验与借鉴研究——以新加坡为例”(编号:CECER-2025-B10)。

PDF(2552 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/