数字教材是数智时代由数字技术赋能的新型教材样态。教师在使用数字教材的过程中,主要涉及责任伦理、知识伦理、关系伦理、秩序伦理、数字伦理五个方面的伦理向度。文章以此为基点,对数字教材的使用进行伦理审视,发现其面临主体责任失落、知识内容存疑、师生关系疏离、教材秩序混乱、师生隐私被侵犯等一系列伦理风险。因此,促成数字教材的善性使用,需要教师实现主体、育知、交往、组织、权益五方面的自觉,达成角色锚定与素养提升的相辅相成、理性审读与价值引领的共同发力、情感触发与活动实践的双向作用、整体规划与规律遵循的相得益彰,以及规范采集与知情同意的协同数据保护。
Abstract
Digital textbooks represent a new form of textbook empowered by digital technology in the era of digital intelligence.In the process of using digital textbooks,teachers primarily engage with five ethical dimensions:responsibility ethics,knowledge ethics,relational ethics,order ethics,and digital ethics.Based on these dimensions,this article conducts an ethical examination of the application of digital textbooks and identifies potential ethical risks,including the erosion of subjective responsibility,questionable knowledgecontent,alienation between teachers and students,disorder in textbook organization,and violations of teacher and student privacy.To promote the beneficial application of digital teaching materials,teachers need to consciously realize the five aspects of subjectivity,education,communication,organization,and rights,achieve the complementary effect of role anchoring and literacy improvement,the joint effort of rational reading and value guidance,the dual effect of emotionaltriggering and activity practice,the complementary effect of overall planningand rule compliance,and the collaborative data protection of standardized collection and informed consent.
关键词
教师 /
数字教材 /
伦理审视 /
教材应用
Key words
teachers /
digital textbooks /
ethical examination /
textbook application
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 教育部等九部门关于加快推进教育数字化的意见[EB/OL].(2025-04-15)[2025-05-12].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/202504/t20250416-1187476.html.
[2] 张蓉菲,董艳,王一凡,等.智能时代数字教材编制的伦理风险及治理进路[J].电化教育研究,2025,46(4):122-128.
[3] 郭利强,谢山莉.融入AI的数字教材编制:伦理审视与风险化解[J].远程教育杂志,2021,39(4):104-112.
[4] 郭利强.数字时代的教材编制:技术伦理与风险规避[J].课程·教材·教法,2021,41(2):43-49.
[5] 亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].廖申白,译注.北京:商务印书馆,2008:3.
[6] 许良.技术哲学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004:137.
[7] 田秀云,白臣.当代社会责任伦理[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:1.
[8] 海德格尔.海德格尔选集:下卷[M].孙周兴,译.上海:生活·读书·新知上海三联书店,1996.
[9] 王者鹤.夸美纽斯与赫尔巴特教育“秩序观”之比较分析[J].学术交流,2014(9):216-220.
[10] Hanna R,Kazim E.Philosophical foundations for digital ethics and AI ethics:a dignitarian approach[J].AI and Ethics,2021(4):405-423.
[11] Fuchs C.Digital ethics:media,communication and society[M].Abingdon:Routledge,2023:14.
[12] 王晨,车丽娜.论学习评价的伦理失范与秩序重建[J].现代基础教育研究,2023,51(3):117-122.
[13] 毛迎新,谭维智.数字媒介时代师生交互的特质嬗变、潜在风险与路向澄明[J].开放教育研究,2022,28(5):39-48.
[14] 温伯格.知识的边界[M].胡泳,高美,译.太原:山西人民出版社,2014:10.
[15] 喻国明.媒体变革:从“全景监狱”到“共景监狱”[J].人民论坛,2009(15):21.
[16] Belis M.How the telephone was invented[EB/OL].(2021-05-21)[2025-05-14].https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-the-telephone-alexander-graham-bell-1991380.
[17] Trucano M.Will technology replace teachers?No,but…[EB/OL].(2015-02-24)[2025-05-14].https://blogs.worldbank.org/edutech/tech-and-teachers.
[18] 孙刚成,胡昕怡.生成式人工智能催生教育变革的基本命题[J].教育与教学研究,2024,38(12):12-25.
[19] 苏慧丽,于伟.否定性:儿童批判性思维培养的前提问题[J].教育学报,2019,15(4):26-34.
[20] 胡金木,张珺.人工智能赋能教学的伦理审视[J].课程·教材·教法,2025,45(2):64-71.
[21] 杜启达,李如密,阎浩.教师跨界学习:内涵、价值及策略[J].教育与教学研究,2022,36(5):65-75.
[22] 张舒涵,孙迎光.思想政治教育运用生成式人工智能的伦理风险及其边界构建[J].现代基础教育研究,2025,57(1):83-88.
基金
*山东省教育教学研究课题“山东省县域初中社会与情感能力培养的长效机制研究”(编号:2024JXQ235)。
PDF(1908 KB)
