协同护理模式下饮食干预对ALL患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间营养状况的影响

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-10-21

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1051-1054.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-10-21

协同护理模式下饮食干预对ALL患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间营养状况的影响

张晓艳^1,2,陆箴琦^3,4,何梦雪²,沈树红²,陈静²

1 复旦大学护理学院,上海 200032;
2 上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心血液肿瘤科,上海 200127;
3 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院护理部,上海 200032;
4 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032

收稿日期:2017-02-12 发布日期:2017-10-10 出版日期:2017-10-10
作者简介:张晓艳(1982-),女,上海人,主管护师,硕士在读,研究方向为血液肿瘤患儿的营养管理。
基金资助:
上海儿童医学中心-雅培/世界健康基金会临床营养发展中心(AFINS-HOPE-2014-04)

Effects of diet intervention under collaborative care model on the nutritional status in ALL patients during therapies for remission induction with L-asp

ZHANG Xiao-yan^1,2,LU Zhen-qi^3,4,HE Meng-xue²,SHEN Shu-hong²,CHEN Jing²

1 School of Nursing,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;
2 Hematology and Oncology Department,Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China;
3 Nursing Department,Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,Shanghai 200032,China;
4 Oncology Department,Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China

Received:2017-02-12 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2017-10-10
Contact: LU Zhen-qi,E-mail:cancerhuli@sohu.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿诱导缓解左旋门冬酰胺酶(L-asp)使用期间的营养状况,比较协同护理模式下的饮食干预与常规饮食干预对ALL患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间营养状况的影响。方法选择2015年3月-2016年2月在上海某三级儿童专科医院确诊急性淋巴细胞白血病并进行诱导缓解治疗的121例患儿,以2015年3-8月为对照组,以2015年9月-2016年2月为干预组。对照组由护士进行常规饮食宣教,干预组采用协同护理模式进行饮食干预,比较两组患儿的营养状况。结果常规饮食宣教指导下,ALL患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间上臂围、肌肉量和血清白蛋白显著下降(P<0.05)。L-asp使用开始日,两组肌肉量对照组优于干预组(P<0.05),在L-asp使用末日,两组肌肉量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组上臂围的下降速度和幅度显著大于干预组。结论急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间存在能量摄入不足,瘦体组织丢失及不同程度的低蛋白血症,应尽早给予营养支持;相较于传统的饮食宣教,协同护理模式下的饮食干预能减缓上臂围的下降速度和幅度,能减少患儿瘦体组织的消耗,可以为患儿提供更好的营养支持。

关键词: 急性淋巴细胞白血病, 左旋门冬酰胺酶, 协同护理模式, 饮食干预, 营养状况

Abstract: Objective To investigate the changes of nutritional status in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) patients during therapies for remission induction with L-asparaginase(L-asp),and to compare the different nutritional status in ALL pediatric patients during therapies for remission induction with L-asp between the regular diet intervention group and the collaborative care model (CCM) diet intervention group. Methods Totally 121 pediatric ALL patients undergoing therapies for remission induction with L-asp in a children's hospital in Shanghai from March 2015 to February 2016 were enrolled in this study and were divided into two groups,with control group from March 2015 to August 2015 and intervention group from September 2015 to February 2016.Patients in control group received the regular diet intervention by nurses.while patients in intervention group received the CCM diet intervention.The nutritional status of the patients was recorded and compared between the two groups. Results During the remission induction with L-asp in pediatric ALL patients,the mid-upper arm circumference,the muscle mass and the serum albumin decreased significantly(P<0.05).The muscle mass of the patients in control group were significantly higher than those in the intervention group(P<0.05) on the first day of L-asp,but there was no significant difference between the two groups on the last day of using L-asp(P>0.05).The change of decrease in mid-upper arm circumferences of the patients in the control group was significantly faster and wider than those in the intervention group(P<0.05). Conclusions The pediatric ALL patients have insufficient energy intake,the loss of fat-free mass and the different levels of hypoproteinemia during the remission induction with L-asp.Nutrition support is suggested to be delivered at the beginning of the therapy.The mid-upper arm circumferences of the patients receiving CCM diet intervention decreased slower than those receiving regular diet intervention.The fat-free mass of the patients receiving the CCM diet intervention lost less than those receiving the regular diet intervention.Therefore,collaborative care model can provide better nutrition support for ALL pediatric patients.

Key words: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L-asparaginase, collaborative care model, diet intervention, nutritional status

中图分类号:

R179

张晓艳,陆箴琦,何梦雪,沈树红,陈静. 协同护理模式下饮食干预对ALL患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间营养状况的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(10): 1051-1054.

ZHANG Xiao-yan,LU Zhen-qi,HE Meng-xue,SHEN Shu-hong,CHEN Jing. Effects of diet intervention under collaborative care model on the nutritional status in ALL patients during therapies for remission induction with L-asp[J]. journal1, 2017, 25(10): 1051-1054.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu41.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgetbjzz/CN/10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-10-21

https://manu41.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgetbjzz/CN/Y2017/V25/I10/1051

参考文献

[1] 崔炎.儿科护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:498.
[2] Hijiya N,van der Sluis IM.Asparaginase-associated toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J].Leuk Lymphoma,2016,57(4):748-757.
[3] Yazbeck N,Samia L,Saab R,et al.Effect of malnutrition at diagnosis on clinical outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J].J Pediatr Hematol Oncol,2016,38(2):107-110.
[4] Esfahani A,Ghoreishi Z,Abedi Miran M,et al.Nutritional assessment of patients with acute leukemia during induction chemotherapy:association with hospital outcomes[J].Leuk Lymphoma,2014,55(8):1743-1750.
[5] Lott TF,Blazey ME,West MG.Patient participation in health care:an underused resource[J].Nurs Clin North Am,1992,27(1):61-76.
[6] Unutzer J.The Collaborative Care Model:An Approach for Integrating Physical and Mental Health Care in Medicaid Health Homes [EB/OL].http://www.medicaid.gov.2013-5.
[7] Briend A,Maire B,Fontaine O,et al.Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children[J].Matern Child Nutr,2012,8(1):130-133.
[8] 陈碧兰.儿童急性白血病患者营养状况调查[J].福建医药杂志,2009,31(5):125-126.
[9] Halpern-Silveira D,Susin LR,Borges LR,et a1.Body weight and fat-free mass changes in a cohort of patients receiving chemotherapy[J].Support Care Cancer,2010,18(5):617-625.
[10] 赵卓琦,费俊,洪莉,等.临床营养师在营养支持小组中的作用及临床实践[J].中国食物与营养,2014,20(9):83-86.
[11] 江秀丽,孙爱莲,王蕾.营养干预对急性淋巴细胞白血病病儿化疗效果影响[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2013,49(5):448-450.
[12] World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning and Research.Model of Care Initiative in Nova Scotia(MOCINS):Final Evaluation Report[R].Canda:Dalhousie University,2010:1-90.

[1]	米腊腊, 张淑一, 张敏, 吴依然, 解军. 应用末梢全血干血斑评估学龄前儿童维生素A营养状况的可靠性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 37-41.
[2]	李晶, 党少农, 相晓妹. 家庭社会经济状况与3岁以内儿童生长发育及营养状况的关系[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(1): 80-83.
[3]	王军, 许文静, 刘碧博, 朱登纳, 熊华春, 袁俊英, 张勇. 脑瘫儿童营养与免疫因子检测及个体化营养干预效果研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(5): 484-487.
[4]	李颖妍, 李鑫, 黄信萍, 徐海兰, 庞伟. 脑瘫儿童营养状况的影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1203-1207.
[5]	蔡啸镝, 刘跃峰. 伊犁地区留守与非留守儿童青少年营养状况比较分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(10): 1135-1139.
[6]	路新源, 王继伟, 车贝贝, 闫芮, 张雅宣, 李鑫磊, 刘茜, 吕冰慧, 吴芃, 余金明. 上海市4区0~5岁儿童生长发育水平及营养状况评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(10): 1169-1172.
[7]	苗瑞菁, 刘士儒, 李素军. 乌鲁木齐市儿童青少年血压状况分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(7): 755-757.
[8]	赵红艳, 张莹, 刘辉, 袁文臻, 方响, 黄小丹, 龙丹凤, 王玉. 宁夏回族自治区永宁县中学生营养状况及影响因素调查研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(7): 789-792.
[9]	王美辰,朱赫男,武薇,任中夏,宫会婷,李婷,孟丽苹,张玉梅. 加餐对儿童青少年膳食营养状况的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(3): 301-304.
[10]	郭璇, 刘志佳, 满盈盈, 李爽. 天津市津南区3~6岁学龄前儿童生长发育Z评分及营养状况评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(11): 1247-1250.
[11]	马文娜, 张秀军. 安庆市开发区0~3岁儿童生长发育Z评分及营养状况评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(9): 1010-1012.
[12]	梁素影, 李蕾, 曾婷, 张健清, 曾佩佩, 李红辉. 柳州市柳南区中小学生2017年健康状况分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(7): 771-774.
[13]	张敕, 朱慧. 不同胎龄低出生体重新生儿营养状况调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(1): 100-102.
[14]	周勇杰,李赋,曹中强,杜玉开. 湖北贫困地区儿童营养状况分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(4): 395-397.
[15]	曾婧,李永俊,张博轩,赵思琪,刘晗,程光文. 武汉市洪山区752名流动儿童生长发育状况调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(11): 1105-1107.

协同护理模式下饮食干预对ALL患儿诱导缓解L-asp使用期间营养状况的影响

Effects of diet intervention under collaborative care model on the nutritional status in ALL patients during therapies for remission induction with L-asp

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics