欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2022, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 551-557.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2022.05.008

• 药物治疗学 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声与X线引导椎体成形术穿刺进针路径的手术疗效及安全性对比研究

叶森1,陈彦震1,赖丽萍2,钟凌剑1,余长章1   

  1. 1兴国县人民医院脊柱外科,赣州 342400,江西;2兴国县人民医院超声科,赣州 342400,江西
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-11 修回日期:2022-04-23 出版日期:2022-05-26 发布日期:2022-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 陈彦震,男,本科,主任医师,研究方向:脊柱外科临床与基础研究。 E-mail: 13507071872@163.com
  • 作者简介:叶森,男,硕士研究生,主治医师,研究方向:脊柱外科临床与基础研究。 E-mail: yesenspine@sina.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江西省科学技术厅基金(20181BBG78020)

Comparison on the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided and X-ray guided for needle approach of percutaneous vertebroplasty

YE Sen1, CHEN Yanzhen1, LAI Liping2, ZHONG Lingjian1, YU Changzhang1   

  1. 1Department of Spinal Surgery, People's Hospital of Xingguo County, Ganzhou 342400, Jiangxi, China; 2Department of Ultrasound, People's Hospital of Xingguo County, Ganzhou 342400, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2022-03-11 Revised:2022-04-23 Online:2022-05-26 Published:2022-06-06

摘要: 目的:通过对比超声与X线引导椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty, PVP)确认穿刺点的成功率、X线辐射量、手术时间及术后疗效,探讨超声引导PVP穿刺进针点的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析我院2018年11月至2021年10月PVP治疗胸腰椎椎体压缩性骨折患者,分为超声引导组和X线引导组,对比两组一次性穿刺成功率、X线辐射量、手术时间及术后疗效等指标。结果:本研究共纳入97例患者,平均随访时间(14.412±10.261)个月;超声引导组一次性穿刺成功率为60.4%,X线引导组一次性穿刺成功率为30.6%,两者比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=8.690,P<0.05),超声引导组总体术中X线辐射量、透视次数和手术时间较X线引导组明显减少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后对腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)的缓解效果显著(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组术后均未出现感染、穿刺点血肿及骨折不愈合等并发症。结论:超声引导确定PVP穿刺进针点是一种安全、有效的穿刺方法,如熟练操作可提高一次性穿刺成功率,与传统X线引导比较可缩短手术时间、降低PVP术中X线透视次数和辐射量。

关键词: 超声引导, 成形术, 骨质疏松, 椎体骨折, 辐射

Abstract:

AIM: To compare ultrasound-guided vertebroplasty (percutaneous vertebroplasty, PVP) with X-ray guided vertebroplasty (PVP) to confirm the success rate of puncture point, X-ray radiation dose, operation time and postoperative outcome to explore the clinical application value of ultrasound-guided vertebroplasty.  METHODS: Patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures treated by PVP in our hospital from November 2018 to October 2021 were divided into ultrasound-guided group and X-ray guided group. The success rate of puncture, the X-ray radiation dose, operation time and postoperative outcome were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were included in this study, with an average follow-up time of (14.412±10.261) months. The success rate of one-time puncture was 60.4% in the ultrasound-guided group and 30.6% in the X-ray guided group (P<0.05). The X-ray radiation dose, fluoroscopy times and operation time in the ultrasound-guided group were significantly lower than those in the X-ray-guided group (P<0.05). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS of low back pain was significantly relieved in the two groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. There were no postoperative complications such as infection, puncture site hematoma and fracture nonunion between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance is a safe and effective method to determine the needle entry point of PVP. Skillful operation can improve the success rate of one-time puncture. Compared with traditional X-ray guidance, it can shorten the operation time, reduce the number of X-ray fluoroscopy and radiation during PVP operation.

Key words: ultrasound-guided, plastic surgery, osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, radiation

中图分类号: