国际托育质量评估与监测体系

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-0276

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 869-873.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-0276

国际托育质量评估与监测体系

黄楹, 童连

复旦大学公共卫生学院妇幼与儿少卫生教研室;公共卫生安全教育部重点实验室,上海 200032

收稿日期:2021-02-25 修回日期:2021-06-08 发布日期:2022-08-17 出版日期:2022-08-10
通讯作者: 童连, E-mail:ltong@fudan.edu.cn
作者简介:黄楹(1995-),女,福建人,在读全日制MPH研究生,主要研究方向为婴幼儿托育和儿童早期发展。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金(20BRK048)

International quality monitoring and assessment of early childhood care and education

HUANG Ying, TONG Lian

Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University/Key Laboratory Public Health Safety, Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200032, China

Received:2021-02-25 Revised:2021-06-08 Online:2022-08-10 Published:2022-08-17
Contact: TONG Lian,E-mail:ltong@fudan.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高质量的托育服务能为儿童、家庭和社会带来持续性的收益。建立完备的托育质量评估和监管体系,有助于保障托育服务的高质量发展。目前我国尚未建立托育机构质量监测系统,也缺少专业化和标准化的托育质量评估工具。本研究系统梳理了国际组织、发达国家和地区的托育质量监测和评估体系,包括政府的监管部门、评估内容架构和评估方式等。提示我国应尽快建立完善托育质量管理和评估体系,加强对托育机构的结构质量、过程质量和结局质量的系统评估。从政策保障、制度建设、专业评估工具研发等方面着手,逐步形成由政府主导,多方参与的托育质量监管模式,以保障托育机构健康和高质量发展。

关键词: 婴幼儿, 托育, 质量监测与评估

Abstract: High-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) benefits to children, families and society in short and long term. It is crucial to establish quality monitoring and assessment system of ECEC. There is no monitoring system of ECEC in China at current stage. Meanwhile, there is a lack of professional and standardized quality assessment tools for ECEC. This study summarizes ECEC quality monitoring and assessment systems including government regulatory agencies, assessment content and Methods in international organizations, developed countries and regions. It is suggested that the government should establish a holistic ECEC quality monitoring and assessment system, emphasizing on the assessment on structural quality, process quality and outcome quality of ECEC. By making policies, developing professional evaluation tools and conducting relative researches, a government-leading and multi-party participated ECEC quality supervision system is expected to set up so as to ensure the healthy and high-quality development of childcare institutions.

Key words: infants and toddlers, early childhood care and education, quality monitoring and assessment

中图分类号:

C924
C913.5

黄楹, 童连. 国际托育质量评估与监测体系[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 869-873.

HUANG Ying, TONG Lian. International quality monitoring and assessment of early childhood care and education[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2022, 30(8): 869-873.

参考文献

[1] Melhuish E, Gardiner J. Structural factors and policy change as related to the quality of early childhood education and care for 3-4 year olds in the UK[J]. Front Educ, 2019,4: 35.
[2] OECD. Starting strong Ⅳ[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.
[3] Baker M, Gruber J, Milligan KJJO. Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being[J]. J Political Econ, 2008,116(4): 709-745.
[4] Felfe C, Lalive R. Does early child care help or hurt children's development?[R].St. Gallen: IFAU-Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy, 2014.
[5] Cubey P, Dalli C. Quality evaluation of early childhood education programmes[Z]. New Zealand: Institute for Early Childhood Studies, 1996.
[6] Litjens I. Literature review on monitoring quality in early childhood education and care (ECEC)[Z]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.
[7] Taguma M, Litjens I, Makowiecki K. Quality matters in early childhood education and care: Norway[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.
[8] Ishimine K, Tayler C, Bennett J. Quality and early childhood education and care: A policy initiative for the 21st century[J].Int J Child Care Educ Policy, 2010,4(2): 67-80.
[9] Ishimine K. Quality and early childhood: The impact on children's social skills[M]. Latvia: VDM Publishing, 2009.
[10] Howes C, Burchinal M, Pianta R, et al. Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs[J]. Early Child Res Q, 2008,23(1): 27-50.
[11] Bennett J, Tayler CP. Starting strong Ⅱ: Early childhood education and care[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2006.
[12] Council of theEuropean Union. Council recommendation of 22 May 2019 on high-quality early childhood education and care systems [EB/OL]. [2021-02-01]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019H0605(01).
[13] OECD. Starting strong Ⅴ[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.
[14] Boller K, Maxwell K. QRIS research: Looking back and looking forward[J]. Early Child Res Q, 2015,30(1): 339-342.
[15] Lugo-gil J, Sattar S, Ross C, et al. The quality rating and improvement system(QRIS) evaluation toolkit[R].Mathematica Policy Research, 2011.
[16] Keller, West Ernst.Survey of Washington State early childhood coaches' communities of practice[D].Washington DC: University of Washington, 2017.
[17] Wahington State Department of Children,Youth and Families. Early achievers quality rating and improvement system[EB/OL].(2020-10-19)[2021/2/1]. https://www.dcyf.wa.gov/services/earlylearning-childcare/early-achievers/rating-system.
[18] Wahington State Department of Children,Youth and Families. Early achievers interactive rating readiness tool [EB/OL]. (2017-06-08)[2020/4/3]. https://www.dcyf.wa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ea/EarlyAchievers_IRRT.pdf.
[19] Kirby G, Caronongan P, Esposito AM, et al. Progress and challenges in developing tiered quality rating and improvement systems (TQRIS) in the Round 1 Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) states[R].Mathematica Policy Research, 2018.
[20] The Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority. National quality standard[EB/OL]. (2018-02-01)[2021/2/1]. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard.
[21] Sims M, Mulhearn G, Grieshaber S, et al. Australian national ECEC reforms, with a focus on the national quality framework and the national quality standard: Expert report for the German Youth Institute[R/OL]. [2021-02-01]. https://rune.une.edu.au/web/handle/1959.11/17641.
[22] Brinkman S, Gregory T, Harris J, et al. Associations between the early development instrument at age 5, and reading and numeracy skills at ages 8, 10 and 12:A prospective linked data study[J]. Child Indic Res, 2013,6(4): 695-708.
[23] Anme T, Segal UA. Implications for the development of children in over 11 hours of centre-based care[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2004,30(4): 345-352.
[24] 童连. 日本幼儿托育和家庭支援体系现状[J]. 人口与健康, 2019,27(8): 10-14.
[25] Fukui I. Child education and care in Japan: Past, present, and future[J]. Kanazawa Hoshiro Universität Human Science Research, 2016,11(1): 25-30.
[26] 何京玉, 郭仁天, 权赫虹. 日本保育政策改革的新进展:基于对《保育所保育指针》第四次修订的分析[J]. 外国教育研究, 2020,47(4): 56-70.
[27] 厚生劳动省. 保育所保育指针解说[Z]. 东京: 福禄贝尔康株式会社, 2018.
[28] 勝部雅史. 《儿童福利设施最低标准》变更对保育水平的影响[J]. 东洋大学人间科学综合研究所纪要, 2018,20(3): 129-147.
[29] Shishido T. The revision of Japan's national guidelines for care and education at day nursery and its problems[J]. Int J Child Care Edu Policy, 2008,2(1): 27-38.
[30] 小山优子. 平成 29年《幼儿园教育指南》,《托儿所儿童保育指南》和《儿童教育和育儿认证指南》的修订[J]. 岛根县立大学专科部松江校区研究纪要, 2018,57: 1-10.
[31] 东京都福祉保健局.经批准的家庭外儿童保育设施准则[EB/OL]. (2021-10-01)[2020-02-01]. https://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kodomo/hoiku/ninkagai/shidoukantoku-kijun/youkouR021001.html.
[32] Park E, Jang M, Park S. Early childhood education policies in Korea: Advances in theory and practice[M]//Early childhood education policies in Asia Pacific. Springer, 2017:87-107.
[33] 韩国保育政策科. 全部托儿所都应接受保育质量评估[EB/OL]. (2019-06-11)[2021-02-01]. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=1&CONT_SEQ=349726.
[34] 冯丽娜. 台湾托婴中心托育质量评鉴进展及评鉴指标研究[J]. 上海教育科研, 2016,32(10): 86-91.
[35] 陈娟娟. 托婴中心教保质量评估指针架构之研究[D].台北:台北市立大学,2019.
[36] 杜丽静, 黄鲲义. 我国台湾地区私立托婴中心的管理经验分享[J]. 早期教育(教育教学), 2019,37(1): 21-23.
[37] 台北市政府社会局.托婴中心评鉴[EB/OL]. (2020-10-07)[2021-02-01]. https://dosw.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=754B679D07789088&s=8F3A87EEBC671E8B.
[38] 卫健委人口监测与家庭发展司. 国家卫生健康委关于印发托育机构保育指导大纲(试行)的通知[EB/OL].(2021-01-12)[2021-02-01]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/rkjcyjtfzs/s7785/202101/deb9c0d7a44e4e8283b3e227c5b114c9.shtml.

国际托育质量评估与监测体系

International quality monitoring and assessment of early childhood care and education

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	孔文瑞, 许梦雪, 贾妮, 穆立娟, 韩颖, 李秋菊, 孟召学, 王淑兰, 朱宗涵, 关宏岩. 北京市0～3岁婴幼儿家长养育照护能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 741-745.
[2]	王丹, 黄垂灿, 樊利春. 回应性喂养对婴幼儿睡眠影响的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 656-660.
[3]	毛萌. 婴幼儿生长迟缓的早期识别与早期干预[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 349-352.
[4]	张雨平. 婴幼儿脑损伤及其早期评估[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 123-125.
[5]	黄亨烨, 于广军. 婴幼儿早期神经发育评估诊断量表的综述[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 162-166.
[6]	张蕾, 胡耀芳, 葛俞伽, 董菁, 刘潘婷, 池霞, 童梅玲, 钱君. 头颅畸形婴幼儿头颅形态特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 200-204.
[7]	尹春岚, 奚翔云, 童梅玲, 朱玲, 张华, 刘云芬, 黄燕, 张永花, 章丽丽, 崔欣华, 倪育, 钟新文, 李霞, 许培斌. 婴幼儿家庭养育照护指导需求分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 32-36.
[8]	王晓彤, 常佳慧, 刘爱华, 张健, 吴琼, 张延峰, 张霆, 朱宗涵. 婴儿期俯卧活动的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 58-61.
[9]	徐玉英, 王雪娜, 李佳, 安子芬, 余立平. 婴幼儿回应性照护的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 71-75.
[10]	刘岩, 李智慧, 孔燕, 尹春岚, 于桂玲. 婴幼儿食欲特征及气质在积极喂养行为和体质指数间的中介调节作用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(9): 965-969.
[11]	贾妮, 许梦雪, 丁美琦, 严双琴, 章青兰, 王宝珍, 李园园, 关宏岩. 中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 839-844.
[12]	丛妍, 徐霞, 王浩, 王栋, 俞露婷, 董陈青, 蒋利, 郑婷婷, 暨佳依. 孤独症谱系障碍婴幼儿早期筛查模式的探究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 689-693.
[13]	王箫, 李莉, 张莺, 丁洁, 孙晓艳, 刘惠娟, 李晶. 嘉兴市9 384例婴幼儿养育风险的现况调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 558-561.
[14]	郑瑞璇, 章丽丽, 周自云, 曹佳妍, 周星, 钱雨倩, 堵飞宇, 程灶火. 婴幼儿孤独症筛查问卷的初步编制和信效度分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 376-380.
[15]	肖婷, 肖湘, 储康康, 柯晓燕. 中文版量化的婴幼儿孤独症筛查量表信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 381-385.