反馈式家庭干预对婴幼儿语言和认知发育的促进作用

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 245-247.

反馈式家庭干预对婴幼儿语言和认知发育的促进作用

徐小娟^{1, 2}, 茅红美³, 江帆^{1, 2}, Jill Gilkerson^{4, 5}, Dongxin Xu^{4, 5}, 忻怡³, 肖蕾¹, 章依文^{1, 2}

1 上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心发育行为儿科, 上海 200127;
2 教育部-上海市环境与儿童健康重点实验室, 上海 200092;
3 上海市卢湾早期教育指导服务中心, 上海 200020;
4 LENA Research Foundation, Boulder, CO;
5 University of Colorado at Boulder

收稿日期:2014-01-15 发布日期:2014-03-05 出版日期:2014-03-05
通讯作者: 章依文, E-mail:zhangyiwen@hotmail.com
作者简介:徐小娟(1986-), 女, 山东人, 在读硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为婴幼儿语言和认知发育。
基金资助:
上海儿童医学中心与美国LENA基金会合作项目(2001);卫生部行业科研专项项目(2010022006)

Positive effects of feedback family intervention on language and cognitive development in infants and toddlers.

XU Xiao-juan^{1, 2}, MAO Hong-mei³, JIANG Fan^{1, 2}, Jill Gilkerson^{4, 5}, Dong-xin Xu^{4, 5}, XIN Yi³, XIAO Lei¹, ZHANG Yi-wen^{1, 2}.

1 Department of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200127, China; 2 MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Shanghai 200092, China; 3 Shanghai Luwan Early Childhood Education Consulting &Service Center, Shanghai 200020, China; 4 LENA Research Foundation, Boulder, CO; 5 University of Colorado at Boulder

Received:2014-01-15 Online:2014-03-05 Published:2014-03-05
Contact: ZHANG Yi-wen, E-mail:zhangyiwen@hotmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨反馈式家庭干预对婴幼儿语言和认知发育的影响, 以及这种干预方式的可行性和家长的接受度。方法以22名4～30月龄的语言发育正常儿童及其家庭为研究对象。入组后, 对儿童进行为期6个月的反馈式家庭干预, 干预前后应用“贝利婴幼儿发育量表(Bayley Scales of Infant Development-I, BSID)”评估其语言和认知发育, 父母填写反馈问卷。结果通过为期6个月的家庭干预, 90%以上的家长认为LENA录音容易实施, 不影响其日常生活;在各项干预措施中家长培训对其帮助最大, 其次是LENA录音;经过1个月干预, 22名儿童的成人-儿童对话轮换数较基线提高9%, 前3个月平均增长6%;基线时对话轮换数较低的50%一组, 在干预后1个月和前3个月时分别提高34%和26%。22名婴幼儿的智力发育指数(mental development index, MDI)平均提高19.69±16.91, 差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论反馈式家庭干预有较好的可行性和家长接受度, 并可有效促进正常发育婴幼儿的语言和认知发育。

关键词: 婴幼儿, 家庭干预, 语言和认知发育

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of feedback family intervention on language and cognitive development in infants and toddlers and to explore the feasibility and parental acceptance of the intervention. Methods A total of 22 typical families/children(4~30 months) were targeted in the study.Bayley Scales of Infant Development-I (BSID) was used to assess language and cognitive development of children at baseline and the end of intervention. Results After 6 months intervention, more than 90% of parents found the LENA recordings were easy to be operated and didn't disturb their daily life.Parent trainings were the most effective method within all intervention, LENA recordings were less effective than parent training.Adult-child conversational turns (CT) increased 9% by the first month, then 6% by the first 3 months of intervention.CT was increased 34% by the first month and 26% by the first three months in the lower half of the sample.After 6 months intervention, Bayley mental development index(MDI) increased 19.69±16.91 (P<0.001). Conclusions LENA as an evaluation tool can reflect parent-child interaction objectively.The feedback family intervention has good feasibility and parental acceptance, and can promote child language and cognitive development.

Key words: infants and toddlers, family intervention, language and cognitive development

中图分类号:

R749.94

徐小娟, 茅红美, 江帆, Jill Gilkerson, Dongxin Xu, 忻怡, 肖蕾, 章依文. 反馈式家庭干预对婴幼儿语言和认知发育的促进作用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2014, 22(3): 245-247.

XU Xiao-juan, MAO Hong-mei, JIANG Fan, Jill Gilkerson, Dong-xin Xu, XIN Yi, XIAO Lei, ZHANG Yi-wen.. Positive effects of feedback family intervention on language and cognitive development in infants and toddlers.[J]. journal1, 2014, 22(3): 245-247.

参考文献

[1] 章依文.语言与言语障碍的发病机理, 诊断与防治[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(10):878-880.
[2] Hagberg BS, Miniscalco C, Gillberg C.Clinic attenders with autism or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:cognitive profile at school age and its relationship to preschool indicators of language delay[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2010, 31(1):1-8.
[3] Reese E, Sparks A, Leyva D.A review of parent interventions for preschool children's language and emergent literacy[J].Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2010, 10(1):97-117.
[4] Paul D, Roth FP.Guiding principles and clinical applications for speech-language pathology practice in early intervention[J].Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2011, 42(3):320-330.
[5] Abraham LM, Crais E, Vernon-Feagans L.Early maternal language use during book sharing in families from low-income environments[J].American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2013, 22(1):71-83.
[6] Hoff E.Context effects on young children's language use:the influence of conversational setting and partner[J].First Language, 2010, 30(3-4):461-472.
[7] 李倩, 廖永琴, 赵轶然, 等.大学生性别角色与父母教养方式的相关研究[J].心理学进展, 2012, 2(4), 193-197.
[8] Dongxin Xu, Umit Yapanel, Sharmi Gray.Reliability of the LENA language environment analysis system in young children's natural home environment[R].2008.LENATM Techenical Repart, 2009.
[9] Buschmann A, Jooss B, Rupp A, et al.Parent based language intervention for 2-year-old children with specific expressive language delay:a randomised controlled trial[J].Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2009, 94(2):110-116.
[10] 赵秀勉, 程亚颖, 王向静.语言发育迟缓儿童家庭语言干预效果的探讨[J].中国妇幼保健, 2008, 23(22):3112-3113.

[1]	孔文瑞, 许梦雪, 贾妮, 穆立娟, 韩颖, 李秋菊, 孟召学, 王淑兰, 朱宗涵, 关宏岩. 北京市0～3岁婴幼儿家长养育照护能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 741-745.
[2]	王丹, 黄垂灿, 樊利春. 回应性喂养对婴幼儿睡眠影响的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 656-660.
[3]	毛萌. 婴幼儿生长迟缓的早期识别与早期干预[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 349-352.
[4]	张雨平. 婴幼儿脑损伤及其早期评估[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 123-125.
[5]	黄亨烨, 于广军. 婴幼儿早期神经发育评估诊断量表的综述[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 162-166.
[6]	张蕾, 胡耀芳, 葛俞伽, 董菁, 刘潘婷, 池霞, 童梅玲, 钱君. 头颅畸形婴幼儿头颅形态特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 200-204.
[7]	尹春岚, 奚翔云, 童梅玲, 朱玲, 张华, 刘云芬, 黄燕, 张永花, 章丽丽, 崔欣华, 倪育, 钟新文, 李霞, 许培斌. 婴幼儿家庭养育照护指导需求分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 32-36.
[8]	王晓彤, 常佳慧, 刘爱华, 张健, 吴琼, 张延峰, 张霆, 朱宗涵. 婴儿期俯卧活动的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 58-61.
[9]	徐玉英, 王雪娜, 李佳, 安子芬, 余立平. 婴幼儿回应性照护的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 71-75.
[10]	刘岩, 李智慧, 孔燕, 尹春岚, 于桂玲. 婴幼儿食欲特征及气质在积极喂养行为和体质指数间的中介调节作用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(9): 965-969.
[11]	贾妮, 许梦雪, 丁美琦, 严双琴, 章青兰, 王宝珍, 李园园, 关宏岩. 中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 839-844.
[12]	黄楹, 童连. 国际托育质量评估与监测体系[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 869-873.
[13]	丛妍, 徐霞, 王浩, 王栋, 俞露婷, 董陈青, 蒋利, 郑婷婷, 暨佳依. 孤独症谱系障碍婴幼儿早期筛查模式的探究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 689-693.
[14]	王箫, 李莉, 张莺, 丁洁, 孙晓艳, 刘惠娟, 李晶. 嘉兴市9 384例婴幼儿养育风险的现况调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 558-561.
[15]	郑瑞璇, 章丽丽, 周自云, 曹佳妍, 周星, 钱雨倩, 堵飞宇, 程灶火. 婴幼儿孤独症筛查问卷的初步编制和信效度分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 376-380.