早期口腔运动干预措施对早产儿预后的效果分析

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-0439

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 133-137.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-0439

早期口腔运动干预措施对早产儿预后的效果分析

杨春燕,周丽英,韩梅盈,申青华,贾焕荣,许平

聊城市人民医院,山东聊城 252000

收稿日期:2018-04-12 修回日期:2018-07-03 发布日期:2019-02-20 出版日期:2019-02-20
通讯作者: 许平,E-mail:1686504672@qq.com
作者简介:杨春燕(1980-),女,山东人,副主任医师,硕士学位,主要研究方向为新生儿危重疾病
基金资助:
山东省重点研发计划项目(2018GSF118173);山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2017wS218)

Efficacy of early premature infant oral motor intervention on the prognosis of premature infants

Liaocheng People′s Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, China

Received:2018-04-12 Revised:2018-07-03 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20
Contact: XU Ping,E-mail:1686504672@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析早期口腔运动干预措施在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)早产儿预后改善的临床意义,为早产儿管理提供科学依据。方法选取2015年1月-2017年1月在聊城市人民医院NICU住院治疗的151例早产儿为研究对象,分为干预组和对照组,生命体征稳定后两组均接受早产儿常规治疗,干预组在常规治疗的基础上接受Sandra Fucile所采用的口腔按摩方法,1次/d,连续14 d;采用中文版早产儿准备经口喂养评估量表(PIOFRA Scale-CV)对早产儿的经口喂养能力进行评价,比较两组经口喂养表现、喂养进程和喂养结局,以及神经行为测定评分,分别于生后3、6月龄时采用婴儿神经系统国际测验量表(Infanib)进行早期运动发育评估。结果到达完全胃肠道喂养时,干预组的矫正胎龄(PMA)明显小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.01,P=0.04);干预组开始经口喂养时的喂养效率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.30,P=0.03),干预组完全经口喂养时体重明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.45,P=0.01);干预开始第10、14天干预组PIOFRA Scale-CV评分显著高于对照组(F=5.658,P=0.02),不同时间和分组之间存在交互效应(F=12.60,P<0.001)。干预组除干预开始后第14天的评分和第10天间评分差异无统计学意义外,各时间段评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组患儿3月龄时接受 Infanib评估,干预组评估结果为正常的比例明显高于对照组(χ²=4.00,P=0.03)。6月龄时接受 Infanib评估,干预组评估结果为异常的比例明显低于对照组,结果为正常的比例明显高于常规组(χ²=10.52,12.10,P<0.01)。结论早产儿经口喂养是一个系统、复杂的过程,监护病房内早期口腔运动干预方案能够缩短早产儿从管饲喂养到完全经口喂养的过渡时间,改善早产儿喂养时的表现。

关键词: 口腔运动干预, 早产儿, 吸吮吞咽功能, 经口喂养

Abstract: Objective To analyze the efficacy of early premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on the prognosis of premature infants in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), in order to provide evidence for the management of premature infants. Methods A total of 151 preterm infants in NICU of Liaocheng People′s Hospital were enrolled in this study, and were divided into intervention group and control group from January 2015 to January 2017.Both groups received routine treatment of preterm infants after stable vital signs, and the intervention group was given oral massage method adopted by Sandra Fucile additionally,with 1 time per day for 14 consecutive days.Chinese Version of Peterm Infant Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale(PIOFRA scale-CV) was used to evaluate the preterm infant′s oral feeding ability, including the oral feeding performance, feeding process and feeding outcome, and Neonatal Behavioral Neurological Assessment(NBNA) results.Infant Neurological International Battery(Infanib) was used for early motor development evaluation at 3 and 6 months after birth respectively. Results The postmenstrual age of the intervention group was significantly smaller than the control group till the completely gastrointestinal feeding(t=3.01,P=0.04).The feeding efficiency of the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t=2.30,P=0.03).The weight of the intervention group reaching completely gastrointestinal feeding was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=3.45,P=0.01).The score of PIOFRA Scale-CV in intervention group was significantly higher than that in control group (F=5.658, P=0.02), and there were interaction effects between different time and groups (F=12.60, P<0.001).Infanib was used to evaluate early motor development at 3 months of age in both groups, and the proportion of normal results in intervention group was significantly higher than that of control group(χ²=4.00,P=0.03).At 6 months of age, the proportion of abnormal results in intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the proportion of normal results was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ²=10.52,12.10,P<0.01). Conclusions Oral feeding in preterm infants is a systematical and complex process.Early oral exercise intervention scheme can shorten the transition time from tube feeding to complete oral feeding, and can improve the performance of feeding in premature infants.

Key words: oral motor intervention, preterm infants, suck and swallow function, oral feeding

中图分类号:

R222.6

杨春燕,周丽英,韩梅盈,申青华,贾焕荣,许平. 早期口腔运动干预措施对早产儿预后的效果分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(2): 133-137.

参考文献

[1] Chantal Lau.Development of suck and swallow mechanisms in infants[J]. Ann Nutr Metab,2015,66(Suppl 5):7-14.
[2] American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement.Hospital discharge of the highrisk neonate[J]. Pediatrics,2008,122:1119-1126.
[3] Sandra Fucilea, David H, McFarland, et al.Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants[J]. Early Hum Dev,2012,88(6):345-350.
[4] 吕天婵,张玉侠,胡晓静,等.早期口腔运动干预方案改善早产儿经口喂养的效果评价[J].中华护理杂志,2013,48(2):10l-105.
[5] Fucile S, Gisel EG, McFarl,et al.Oral and non-oral sensorimotor interventions enhance feeding performance in preterm infants[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol,2011,53:829-835.
[6] 黄晓虹,贺娟,陈晓文.影响早产儿20项神经行为评分的危险因素分析[J]. 中国小儿急救医学,2011,18(2):116-119.
[7] Lau C, Smith EO.Interventions to improve oral feeding performance of preterm infants[J]. Acta Paediatr,2012,101(7):e269-e274.
[8] Lau C, Alagugurusamy R, Schanler RJ, et al.Characterization of the developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding[J].Acta Paediatr,2000,89:846-852.
[9] Lessen BS, Morello CA, Williams LJ.Establishing intervention fidelity of an oral motor intervention for preterm infants[J].Neonatal Netw,2015,34(2):72-82.
[10] Lau C.Development of infant oral feeding skills:what do we know?[J] Am J Clin Nutr,2016,103(Suppl 2):616-621.
[11] Schonhaut L,Armijo I,Perez M.Gestational age and developmental risk in moderately and late preterm and early term infants[J].Pediatrics,2015,135(4):e835-e841.
[12] Poore MA,Barlow SM.Suck predicts neuromotor integrity and developmental outcomes[J].Perspect Speech Science and Orofac Disorder,2009,19:44-51.
[13] 周梅,尹华英,程茜,等.无明显脑损伤早产儿早期口腔吸吮模式与6月龄时神经发育结局相关性研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2016,11(1):8-12.
[14] 罗芳,陈正,马晓路,等.Infanib对新生儿重症监护病房出院早产儿早期运动发育及预后评估[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(1):5-8.

[1]	张丹, 张军, 杨钰荣, 曹咪, 闫敬敏, 朱璐阳. 肠道菌群与早产儿脑发育及神经认知行为关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 756-759.
[2]	冯骁, 陈凌, 赵红缨, 黄蕊, 林辰曦, 庄丽娟. 不同脐带挤压方式对极早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 794-798.
[3]	郑亭玉, 张春宇, 杨飞, 郑芳, 张梦霞, 夏露萍, 徐孙超. 营养支持小组管理模式对早产儿生长发育及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 555-558.
[4]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[5]	李静兰, 孙文强, 朱雪萍. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良相关预测模型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 395-398.
[6]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[7]	任力, 黑明燕, 齐宇洁, 靳绯, 翁景文, 董世霄, 沈艳华, 姜敏. 早产儿喂养对坏死性小肠结肠炎发病的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 438-441.
[8]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[9]	王晶, 项思嘉, 鲁莹, 杨蕾, 胡小沙, 钱君, 池霞, 张敏. 早产儿3周岁体格生长及体成分分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 457-460.
[10]	郑水英, 罗艳赟. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床表现及相关影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 461-464.
[11]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[12]	何小颖, 吴翠玲, 曾玲艳, 綦美姣, 孙亚莲. 早产儿食物转换对血清营养素水平的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 81-85.
[13]	王慧冉, 罗荣, 胡文玲. 2019年3所妇幼保健院早产儿视网膜病变筛查及随访分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 105-108.
[14]	和娇吉, 刘孝美, 唐孟言, 罗红, 杨速飞, 彭文涛. 基于AIMS分析早产儿运动发育现状及影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(7): 779-782.
[15]	王成群, 徐海青, 汪鸿, 袁利, 周爱琴, 李明惠. 医护教家相结合养育照护促进高危早产儿发育的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 607-611.

早期口腔运动干预措施对早产儿预后的效果分析

Efficacy of early premature infant oral motor intervention on the prognosis of premature infants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics