全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0656

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 443-446.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0656

全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用

马艳艳¹, 申飞飞², 李海英², 索桂海², 吴尤佳²

1 亳州市人民医院,安徽亳州 236800;
2 南通大学附属医院,江苏南通 226000

收稿日期:2019-07-13 发布日期:2020-04-10 出版日期:2020-04-10
通讯作者: 吴尤佳, E-mail:francis_nt@163.com
作者简介:马艳艳(1992-),女,安徽人,回族,住院医师,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为发育脑保护。
基金资助:
江苏省妇幼健康科研项目基金(F201853、F201649);南通市卫健委科研课题(QA2019059)

Application of general movements combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature asphyxiated infants

MA Yan-yan¹, SHEN Fei-fei², LI Hai-ying², SUO Gui-hai², WU You-jia²

1 Bozhou People′s Hospital,Bozhou,Anhui 236800,China;
2 Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong,Jiangsu 226000,China

Received:2019-07-13 Online:2020-04-10 Published:2020-04-10
Contact: WU You-jia,E-mail:francis_-nt@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析全身运动质量评估(GMs)联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用价值。方法选取2017年2月-2018年3月在南通大学附属医院新生儿病房治疗的60例窒息早产儿为研究对象,根据2012年早产儿脑损伤专家共识将研究对象分为脑损伤组(n=28)、非脑损伤组(n=32),分别于生后7 d内(至少2次)、纠正胎龄满40周行Dubowitz神经学检查,在足月前阶段、扭动运动阶段以及不安运动阶段行GMs的初筛和复筛,在纠正胎龄3个月、6个月及12个月时行婴幼儿智能发育量表测定(CDCC)。分析GMs联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿脑损伤中的早期诊断价值及与CDCC的相关性。结果 1)GMs联合Dubowitz神经学检查预测窒息早产儿脑损伤的灵敏度为96.43%,特异度为84.38%。2)GMs联合Dubowitz对早产儿脑损伤的筛查阳性率与纠正胎龄满3个月、6个月、12个月时CDCC(PDI、MDI)评分均具有正相关性(r=0.71、0.66;0.67、0.59;0.73、0.71),其中与12个月CDCC相关性最强。结论 GMs联合Dubowitz神经学检查可作为窒息早产儿脑损伤早期诊断的有效手段。

关键词: 全身运动质量评估, Dubowitz神经学检查, 窒息, 早产儿, 脑损伤

Abstract: Objective To analyze the application value of general movements(GMs) combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in the evaluation of neurodevelopment in asphyxiated premature infants. Methods A total of 60 premature asphyxiated infants treated in the neonatal ward of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from February 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled in the study,and were divided into brain injury group(n=28) and non-brain injury group(n=32)according to the consensus of experts on brain injury of premature infants in 2012. Dubowitz neurological examination was performed at least twice within 7 days after birth and 40 weeks after correcting gestational age. GMs screening and re-screening were performed in the pre-term stage,writhing movements stage and fidgety movements stage.Children′s Developmental Center of China(CDCC) was conducted at the corrected age of 3,6 and 12 months old.The early diagnostic value of GMs combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in brain injury of premature infants with asphyxia and its correlation with CDCC were analyzed. Results 1)The sensitivity and specificity of GMs combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in predicting brain injury in premature infants with asphyxia were 96.43% and 84.38%,respectively. 2)The positive rate of GMs combined with Dubowitz in screening for brain injury in premature infants was positively correlated with the CDCC(PDI、MDI) score at 3,6 and 12 months of gestational age (r=0.71,0.66;0.67,0.59;0.73,0.71),and the correlation was the strongest at 12 months. Conclusion GMs combined with Dubowitz neurological examination can be used as an effective means for early diagnosis of brain injury in premature infants with asphyxia.

Key words: general movements, Dubowitz neurological examination, asphyxia, premature infants, brain injury

中图分类号:

R722.6

马艳艳, 申飞飞, 李海英, 索桂海, 吴尤佳. 全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(4): 443-446.

MA Yan-yan, SHEN Fei-fei, LI Hai-ying, SUO Gui-hai, WU You-jia. Application of general movements combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature asphyxiated infants[J]. journal1, 2020, 28(4): 443-446.

参考文献

[1] 刘俊燕,熊涛,冯虹,等.新生儿窒息多器官功能损害的危险因素分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2011,13(12):940-943.
[2] Einspieler C,Bos AF,Libertus ME,et al.The general movement assessment helps us to identify preterm infants at risk for cognitive dysfunction[J].Fron Psychol,2016,7:406.
[3] 李明.早产与足月新生儿神经学评估[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2016.
[4] Setänen S,Lahti K,Lehtonen L,et al.Neurological examination combined with brain MRI or cranial US improves prediction of neurologicaloutcome in preterm infants[J].Early Hum Dev,2014,90(12):851-856.
[5] 中国医师协会新生儿专业委员会.早产儿脑损伤诊断与防治专家共识[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2012,14(12):883-884.
[6] Epelman M,Daneman A,Chauvin N,et al.Head ultrasound and MR imaging in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy:competitive or complementary imaging studies?[J].Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2012,20(1):93-115.
[7] SkiÖld B,Eriksson C,Eliasson AC,et al.General movements and magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of neuromotor outcome in children born extremely preterm[J].Early Hum Dev,2013,89(7):467-472.
[8] Tomantschger I,Herrero D,Einspieler C,et al.The general movement assessment in non-European low- and middle-income countries[J].Rev Saude Publica,2018,52:6.
[9] Dubowitz LM,Dubowitz V,Palmer P,et al.A new approach to the neurological assessment of the preterm and full-term newborn infant[J].Brain Dev,1980,2(1):3-14.
[10] Molteno C,Grosz P,Wallace P.Neurological examination of the preterm and full-term infant at risk for developmental disabilities using the Dubowitz Neurological Assessment[J].Early Hum Dev,1995,41:167-176.
[11] 李宁,贾飞勇,杜琳.全身运动质量评估:超早期预测早产儿神经发育结局的可靠工具[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(4):317-320.
[12] Wusthoff CJ.How to use:the neonatal neurological examination[J].Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed,2013,98(4):148-153.

[1]	张丹, 张军, 杨钰荣, 曹咪, 闫敬敏, 朱璐阳. 肠道菌群与早产儿脑发育及神经认知行为关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 756-759.
[2]	冯骁, 陈凌, 赵红缨, 黄蕊, 林辰曦, 庄丽娟. 不同脐带挤压方式对极早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 794-798.
[3]	郑亭玉, 张春宇, 杨飞, 郑芳, 张梦霞, 夏露萍, 徐孙超. 营养支持小组管理模式对早产儿生长发育及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 555-558.
[4]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[5]	李静兰, 孙文强, 朱雪萍. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良相关预测模型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 395-398.
[6]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[7]	任力, 黑明燕, 齐宇洁, 靳绯, 翁景文, 董世霄, 沈艳华, 姜敏. 早产儿喂养对坏死性小肠结肠炎发病的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 438-441.
[8]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[9]	王晶, 项思嘉, 鲁莹, 杨蕾, 胡小沙, 钱君, 池霞, 张敏. 早产儿3周岁体格生长及体成分分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 457-460.
[10]	郑水英, 罗艳赟. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床表现及相关影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 461-464.
[11]	张雨平. 婴幼儿脑损伤及其早期评估[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 123-125.
[12]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[13]	何小颖, 吴翠玲, 曾玲艳, 綦美姣, 孙亚莲. 早产儿食物转换对血清营养素水平的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 81-85.
[14]	王慧冉, 罗荣, 胡文玲. 2019年3所妇幼保健院早产儿视网膜病变筛查及随访分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 105-108.
[15]	和娇吉, 刘孝美, 唐孟言, 罗红, 杨速飞, 彭文涛. 基于AIMS分析早产儿运动发育现状及影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(7): 779-782.

全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用

Application of general movements combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature asphyxiated infants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics