家庭开放性激发试验诊断婴儿非IgE介导牛奶蛋白过敏的临床研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-0357

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 689-693.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-0357

家庭开放性激发试验诊断婴儿非IgE介导牛奶蛋白过敏的临床研究

熊励晶¹, 何小庆¹, 李静¹, 李杨¹, 杨文旭², 刘丽荣¹, 谢晓丽¹

成都市妇女儿童中心医院1.儿童消化内科;
2.儿童保健科,四川成都 610091

收稿日期:2021-02-08 修回日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-08-04 出版日期:2021-06-10
通讯作者: 谢晓丽,E-mail:xxlilye@qq.com
作者简介:熊励晶(1985-),女,四川人,儿科学博士,主治医师,主要研究方向为儿童消化系统疾病与营养治疗。
基金资助:
四川省卫生健康委员会普及推广项目(16PJ070)

Study on the family open oral food challenge in infants with non-IgE mediated cow'smilk protein allergy

XIONG Li-jing^*, HE Xiao-qing, LI Jing, LI Yang, YANG Wen-xu, LIU Li-rong, XIE Xiao-li

^*Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology,Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital,Chengdu,Sichuan 610091,China

Received:2021-02-08 Revised:2021-03-15 Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-08-04
Contact: XIE Xiao-li, E-mail:xxlilye@q.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究家庭开放性口服激发试验(OFC)在非IgE介导牛奶蛋白过敏婴儿中应用时的结果判读,从而提高家长症状报告的准确性。方法前瞻性纳入2018年11月—2019年6月接受家庭开放性OFC的婴儿,分析其诊断效能及家长症状报告的准确性。结果 162例婴儿[(5.85±3.03)月龄]接受OFC进行确诊,142例婴儿[(8.10±3.08)月龄]接受OFC进行口服耐受的判断。在激发过程中没有严重过敏反应发生,142例报告出现不同程度症状。皮肤和胃肠道反应多分别出现在激发试验的第1天(77.78%)和第1周(79.58%)。家长报告与医生判断结果一致性Kappa指数0.868(P<0.001);家庭开放性OFC准确性为93.42%,假阳性率9.15%,假阴性率4.32%,阳性预测值90.85%,阴性预测值95.68%。呕吐是最常见的假阳性报告症状;激发量及观察时间是导致假阴性的主要因素。结论家庭开放性激发试验用于非IgE介导的牛奶蛋白过敏婴儿是安全且准确率较高的诊断手段。通过家长教育以及对于症状可重复性的识别,能够提高其准确性。

关键词: 口服激发试验, 牛奶蛋白过敏, 非IgE介导, 婴儿

Abstract: Objective To evaluate outcome interpretation of family open oral food challenge(OFC) utilized in infants who could not be confirmed by CMP-specific IgE and skin prick tests,in order to improve the accuracy of parent-reported symptoms. Methods A prospective study was conducted to enroll infants who took open OFCs from November 2018 to June 2019. The diagnosis efficiency and the accuracy of parent-reported symptoms were analyzed. Results A total of 162 infants received OFC for diagnosis,with an average age of(5.85±3.03)months old.While OFCs were conducted in 142 infants [(8.10±3.08) months old] for the judgment of oral tolerance.No episodes of anaphylaxis occurred in the process of challenge.Cutaneous and gastrointestinal symptoms were commonly reported on the first day of the test(77.78%) and the first week(79.58%).Kappa coefficient was 0.868(P＜0.001),suggesting good consistency of judgments between parents and specialists.The diagnosis accuracy of family open OFC tesx was 93.43%.The false-positive rate,false-negative rate,positive predictive value,negative predictive value was 9.15%,4.32%,90.85% and 95.68%,respectively.Vomiting was the most frequent reactions reported in false-positive cases.The amount of stimulation formula and the observation time were the important factors accounting for the false-negative results. Conclusions Family open OFC is an accurate and safe tool for assessing oral tolerance status in CMPA infants.The detailed instruction for parents and identification of the reproducibility could increase the safety and reliability of open OFC performing at home.

Key words: open oral food challenge, cow's milk protein allergy, non-IgE mediated, infants

中图分类号:

R725.9

熊励晶, 何小庆, 李静, 李杨, 杨文旭, 刘丽荣, 谢晓丽. 家庭开放性激发试验诊断婴儿非IgE介导牛奶蛋白过敏的临床研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(6): 689-693.

XIONG Li-jing, HE Xiao-qing, LI Jing, LI Yang, YANG Wen-xu, LIU Li-rong, XIE Xiao-li. Study on the family open oral food challenge in infants with non-IgE mediated cow'smilk protein allergy[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2021, 29(6): 689-693.

参考文献

[1] Hu Y,Chen J,Li H. Comparison of food allergy prevalence among Chinese infants in Chongqing,2009 versus 1999[J].Pediatr Int,2010,52:820-824.
[2] Gupta RS,Warren CM,Smith BM,et al.The public health impact of parent-reported childhood food allergies in the united states[J].Pediatrics,2018,142(6):e20181235.
[3] Alsaggaf A,Murphy J,Leibel S. Estimating cost-effectiveness of confirmatory oral food challenges in the diagnosis of children with food allergy[J].Glob Pediatr Health,2019,6:2333794X19891298.
[4] Niggemann B,Beyer K. Pitfalls in double-blind,placebo-controlled oral food challenges[J].Allergy,2007,62(7):729-732.
[5] Mankad VS,Williams LW,Lee LA,et al.Safety of open food challenges in the office setting[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol,2008,100(5):469-474.
[6] Venter C,Pereira B,Voigt K,et al.Comparison of open and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in diagnosis of food hypersensitivity amongst children[J].J Hum Nutr Diet, 2007,20(6):565-579.
[7] Ito K. Diagnosis of food allergies:the impact of oral food challenge testing[J].Asia Pac Allergy, 2013,3(1):59-69.
[8] Koletzko S,Niggemann B,Arato A,et al.Diagnostic approach and management of cow's-milk protein allergy in infants and children:ESPGHAN GI Committee practical guidelines[J].J PediatrGastroenterolNutr, 2012,55(2):221-229.
[9] Bindslev-Jensen C,Ballmer-Weber BK,Bengtsson U,et al.Standardization of food challenges in patients with immediate reactions to foods--position paper from the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology[J].Allergy,2004,59(7):690-697.
[10] Sampson HA,Gerth van Wijk R,Bindslev-Jensen C,et al.Standardizing double-blind,placebo-controlled oral food challenges:American Academy of Allergy,Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report[J].J Allergy ClinImmunol,2012,130(6):1260-1274.
[11] 中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组.食物过敏相关消化道疾病诊断与管理专家共识[J].中华儿科杂志,2017,55(7):487-492.
[12] Niggemann B. When is an oral food challenge positive?[J].Allergy,2010,65(1):2-6.
[13] Miura T,Yanagida N,Sato S,et al.Follow-up of patients with uncertain symptoms during an oral food challenge is useful for diagnosis[J].Pediatr Allergy Immunol,2018,29(1):66-71.
[14] Caffarelli C,Petroccione T. False-negative food challenges in children with suspected food allergy[J].Lancet,2001,358(9296):1871-1872.
[15] Clark AT,Mangat JS,Tay SS,et al.Facial thermography is a sensitive and specific method for assessing food challenge outcome[J].Allergy,2007,62(7):744-749.
[16] Sampson HA,Aceves S,Bock SA,et al.Food allergy:a practice parameter update-2014[J].J Allergy ClinImmunol,2014,134(5):1016-1025.
[17] Yanagida N,Okada Y,Sato S,et al.New approach for food allergy management using low-dose oral food challenges and low-dose oral immunotherapies[J].Allergol Int, 2016,65(2):135-140.
[18] Mendonça RB,Franco JM,Cocco RR,et al.Open oral food challenge in the confirmation of cow's milk allergy mediated by immunoglobulin E[J].AllergolImmunopathol(Madr),2012,40(1):25-30.

家庭开放性激发试验诊断婴儿非IgE介导牛奶蛋白过敏的临床研究

Study on the family open oral food challenge in infants with non-IgE mediated cow'smilk protein allergy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张丽晋, 王丹, 康洪霞, 王奇娟, 魏乾伟, 何辉, 尚晓瑞, 李一辰. 北京市两区婴儿睡眠行为和睡眠问题横断面研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 689-692.
[2]	尹晓辉, 王葳, 张姣姣, 王洋, 许亚红. 父亲参与婴儿教养量表的汉化[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 369-373.
[3]	单瑞洁, 韩静, 屈克丽, 乐蕾, 崔乃雪. 婴儿屏幕暴露的相关因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 374-378.
[4]	王硕, 李心悦, 魏瑗, 刘鹭燕, 李在玲, 张华. 母亲孕晚期肠道菌群与婴儿食物过敏的关系[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(9): 941-946.
[5]	张小甜, 张悦, 邓梁琼, 赵蓉蓉, 李容, 张风华, 徐韬. 母亲抑郁情绪对3月龄婴儿发育影响的关联性分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(9): 947-951.
[6]	王丽宁, 王冬雪, 李英丽, 齐娜, 李杨, 张慧. 父亲参与婴儿照顾体验质性研究的Meta整合分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 655-659.
[7]	胡丹, 汪晓霞, 崔一帆, 刘璞, 梁倩, 肖绪武. 辅助生殖技术受孕单胎早产儿出生结局和认知发育的纵向研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 669-672.
[8]	申家建, 单玲, 贾飞勇, 李洪华. 3～6月龄婴儿Hammersmith婴儿神经检查最优评分影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 677-679.
[9]	李欣, 王战胜, 陈燕梅, 张寅, 杜锟. Alberta婴儿运动量表在评估早期综合性干预对早产儿预后影响的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 562-565.
[10]	李玉萍, 陈颖, 陈舒旗, 肖霞, 齐志业, 李燕. 农村妇女孕期膳食模式对婴儿认知发育的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(3): 244-248.
[11]	胡丹, 汪晓霞, 崔一帆, 刘璞, 梁倩, 肖绪武. 辅助生殖技术试管足月儿神经心理行为发育的纵向研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(2): 140-143.
[12]	屈福祥, 胡斌, 王成举, 黄天琪, 吴婕翎, 王玉梅, 孙克兴, 田园, 曾宇东, 张雪娇, 高越, 孟凡萍, 穆立娟, 卢爱洁, 李海薇, 武宁, 张雨平. 中美婴儿运动表现测试常模差异分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(2): 148-152.
[13]	高淑芝, 李阳, 贾玉凤, 董琰, 张双, 高静云. 基于AIMS评估指导早产儿家庭干预对运动技能发展的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(2): 225-228.
[14]	张怡敏, 靳和玥, 陶芳标, 朱昱敏. 中晚期早产儿不良神经发育结局的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1198-1202.
[15]	李占魁, 白瑞苗. 妊娠期高血糖暴露对子代神经发育结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1045-1048.