非言语型学习障碍儿童的认知方式与行为特征的研究

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 204-206.

非言语型学习障碍儿童的认知方式与行为特征的研究

王庆雄¹,蔡小梅²,李秀红¹,金宇¹,静进¹

1 中山大学公共卫生学院妇幼卫生学系,广东广州 510080;
2 广东省妇幼保健院,广东广州 510010

收稿日期:2011-01-20 发布日期:2011-03-06 出版日期:2011-03-06
通讯作者: 静进,E-mail:jingjin@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:王庆雄(1963-),男,广东人,讲师,主要研究方向为儿童心理卫生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(30872131);教育部博士点基金项目资助(20070558277)

Cognitive style and behaviour problems in children with nonverbal learning disabilities

WANG Qing-xiong¹, CAI Xiao-mei², LI Xiu-hong¹, JIN Yu¹, JING Jin¹

1 Faculty of Maternal and Child Health, Public Health School, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China;
2 Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital and Health Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510010, China

Received:2011-01-20 Online:2011-03-06 Published:2011-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】了解非言语型学习障碍(nonverbal learning disabilities,NLD)儿童认知方式与行为特征,探讨影响NLD发病的因素。【方法】对符合ICD-10和DSM-III筛查诊断标准31名NLD儿童、24名言语型学习障碍(verbal learning disabilities, VLD)儿童和40名正常儿童,采用镶嵌图形测验(EFT)和棒框测验(RFT)测量认知方式,Achenbach儿童行为量表测量行为问题。数据采用单因素方差分析和多重比较分析。【结果】 NLD儿童的EFT的不同难度的三部分成绩和总成绩都比正常对照组儿童得分低(P<0.01),而VLD儿童仅总成绩低于正常对照组(P<0.05)。NLD儿童RFT的偏差明显大于正常对照组和VLD儿童(P<0.05),但VLD儿童与正常对照组的差异无统计学意义。NLD男童的社交能力和学校学习情况得分显著低于对照组,VLD男童亦表现出同样的问题;NLD男童各因子的得分明显高于对照组男童,在分裂样、抑郁、强迫性、体诉、社交退缩、多动、攻击性方面也比VLD男童得分高。【结论】 NLD儿童认知方式以场依存性为主,其行为问题亦比正常儿童和VLD儿童突出。

关键词: 非言语型学习障碍, 儿童, 认知方式, 行为问题

Abstract: 【Objective】 To investigate cognitive style and behaviour problems in children with nonverbal learning disabilities and to explore the infective factors of nonverbal learning disabilities(NLD). 【Methods】 31 cases of NLD children and 24 cases of verbal learning disabilities(VLD) children who met the ICD-10 and DSM-III criteria and 40 cases of matched children were enrolled. All of them were examined with embedded figures test(EFT), rod-and-frame test(RFT), and Achenbach Child Behavior Check-List(CBCL). The data were analyzed with one way ANOV and multiple comparisons. 【Results】 All parts of EFT scores in NLD children(3.41±1.82,11.38±10.31,3.62±8.07,18.41±17.47) were significant less than matched children(5.03±1.80,27.00±17.56,13.83±14.22,45.84±31.65,P<0.01), otherwise only total scores in VLD children(30.35±28.98) less than matched children(45.84±31.65,P<0.05). RFT showed that NLD children(4.29°±2.41°) tend to make larger errors of absolute angular misalignment than matched children(3.08°±1.23°) and VLD children(3.31°±1.38°,P<0.05), but there was no significant different between VLD and matched children(P>0.05). The severity of behavior problem presented in NLD children were more than VLD children and matched children. 【Conclusions】 Performance on EFT and RFT indicated that NLD children are likely field dependent than VLD and matched children.

Key words: nonverbal learning disabilities, children, cognitive style, behavior problem

中图分类号:

R749.94

王庆雄,蔡小梅,李秀红,金宇,静进. 非言语型学习障碍儿童的认知方式与行为特征的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(3): 204-206.

WANG Qing-xiong, CAI Xiao-mei, LI Xiu-hong, JIN Yu, JING Jin. Cognitive style and behaviour problems in children with nonverbal learning disabilities[J]. journal1, 2011, 19(3): 204-206.

参考文献

[1] Semrud-Clikeman M, Walkowiak J, Wilkinson A, et al. Direct and indirect measures of social perception, behavior, and emotional functioning in children with Asperger's disorder, nonverbal learning disability, or ADHD[J]. J Abnorm Child Psychol,2010,38(4):509-519.
[2] 于海英,张修竹,刘爱书,等.非言语型学习障碍儿童社会信息加工的特点[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2008,22(11):787-790,795.
[3] 张修竹,刘爱书,沈悦,等.非言语型学习障碍儿童情绪面目表情认知特点研究[J].中国特殊教育,2008,8(1):54-59.
[4] 王庆雄,蔡小梅,静进,等.非言语型学习障碍儿童视觉空间认知特征与行为问题[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005, 19(1):15-18.
[5] 刘爱书,张修竹,张妍,等.非言语型学习障碍儿童视觉空间工作记忆的研究[J].心理科学,2008,31(5):1126-1129.
[6] Jing J, Wang QX, Yang BR, et al. Neuropsychological characteristics of selective attention in children with nonverbal learning disabilities[J]. Chin Med J(Engl),2004,117(12):1834-1837.
[7] Mammarella IC, Lucangeli D, Cornoldi C. Spatial working memory and arithmetic deficits in children with nonverbal learning difficulties[J]. J Learn Disabil,2010,43(5):455-468.
[8] 王丽娟,吴韬,邱文威,等.青少年基于事件的前瞻记忆:认知方式和情绪[J].心理科学,2010,47(5):1244-1247.
[9] 梁亮,吴家舵.场依存型一场独立型影响体育广告注视的眼动研究[J].心理科学,2010,47(4):857-860.
[10] 李寿欣.不同认知方式个体图形一致性判断过程中的ERP研究[J].心理学探新,2008,38(3):47-52.
[11] 凌辉,黄希庭.场依存-独立性认知方式与儿童自立水平的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(4):384-386.
[12] 李寿欣,李传银.心理实验的操作与演示[J].山东省青岛市,2000:143-145.
[13] 忻仁娥.Achenhach's儿童行为量表中国标准化[J].上海精神医学,1992,4(1):167-169.
[14] 祁乐瑛,梁宁建.场依存性—独立性认知方式对心理旋转的影响[J].心理科学,2009,46(2):262-265.
[15] 任杰,金志成,龚维娜.场认知方式与外显内隐记忆的关系研究[J].心理科学,2009,46(5):1103-1105.