1 Bieller HL, Riehm. Cellular esistan to actormycin D in hi-nese hanster cdl in wto; crosresist aoe madioutographic stud-ies, Cancer Res, 1970, 30; 1174-9 2 Ling v, Juliano RL. A suface glyoprotein modulaing drugpermeability in chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. BiochemBiophys Acta, 1978; 455; 1520 3 lhicbaut F, Tsuruo T, Hamada H. Cellular localization d themultidug resistance gene product P-glycopotein in normal hu-man tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1987, 84; 735 4 Tsuno T, Iida H, Tsukagoshis, et al. Overoming of vin-cristine esistance in P388 leukemia in vivo and vitrothroughenhanced cytotoxicity of vincritine and vinblastine by verapamil.Canoer Res, 1981;41: 1967-71 5 Ford JM, Hait W N.Phamacology of dugs that alter multidrugresistance in cancer. Phamacol Rev, 1990, 42, 1551 6 SmithMA, Merry s, Smith JG, et al. Clinically relevant ooncentations of venapamil do not enchance the sensitivity of humanbone marow CFU. GM to adriamycin and VP-16. Br J Cancer,1988; 57; 5762 7 Norimasa S, Tetsuo M, T'atsuto K, et al. 'Two dyridine ana-logues with more effective ability to everse mul tidrug resistanceand with lower calcium channel blocking activity than their dihy-dopyidine countenparts. Cancer Res, 1990; 50; 3055 8 Muller F, Ferandis GE, Comil Scharwtzl, et al.Evidenc fortmanscriptional contol of human mdr I gene expression by verapamil in multidrug esistant leukemia cell. Molecular Phammacol, 1995; 47;51-7 9 Kmnr perumer L, vuban IN, reglion JL, etal. In Vio 1e-versal of mu ltidrug resist nce by twonew dihydopyridine deriva-tives, S16317 and S16324. Aca Oncol, 1994; 3331 10 Yang PM, Li JH, Wang XQ, Resersional effedt of sometradi-tiond medicine on mult idrug resistance in the K562/ADM cellline, Anticancer Drag, 1994,5(suppl l): 350 11 Froidevanx S, Loor F.Myeloidand lymphoid cell alterations innomal mice exposed to chendheraphy with doxorcubicin andor the multidhug resist unce reversing agent SDZPSC833. Int JCancer, 1994; 59; 133-8 12 Kirk J, Syel SK, HarrisAL, et al. Resersa of P-glycopotienmoliated multidrug resistance by pure antioestogens and noveltamoxifen derivatives, Biochem Phamacol, 1994; 48: 27782 13 Gruol Dr, Zee MC, 'TrotterJ, et al. Reversal of multidrug re-sistance by RU486. Cancer Res, 1994; 54; 3088-, 92 14 Galski H, Lazaovici P, Gottesman MM, et al.KT-5720 re-verses mu ltidug esistance in variant S49 mouse lymphoma cellstraunsducod with the human mdr-l cDNA andin human mul-lichitidrug wsistant qaeinoma cells. Eur I Cancer.19951. 380-5 15 MedinJL, Guerci A, MachalS, et al. Comparative evaluartion of S9788, verapamil and cyclosponine A in K562 humanleukemia cell lines in pglywprotei expressing samples fiompatients with hematologic malignancies, Blood, 1994, 84, 262-8 16 Jacques Robert, Multidug resistance reversal. Drug of the Fu-ture, 1997; 22; 149--60 17 Sato W, Fukazawa N, Nakanishi O, et al.Resersal of mul-tidng resistance by a novel qui noline derivative, MS 209. Can-cerChemother Phammacol, 1995; 35; 271-9 18 Catherine M, Barridge G, Higgine CF, et al.The mu ltidrugresist ance agent S R33557 and modulation of vinca alkaloidbi nding to P glyooprotein ly allosteric interaction. Br J Phamna-col, 1997; 122; 7652 19 Klopman G, SrivastavaS, Kolossvany I, et al. Structive activi-ty study and design of mult idrug esistant eversal compounds bya compu ter automated structure evaluation methodology. CancerRes, 1992; 52,4121-5 20 Ramu A, Ramu N.Reversal of mu ltidng esistance by bis(pherylalky 1) amines and stnucturally related compounds.Cancer Chenother Phamaool, 1994; 34: 42330 21 StfaniaS, Akhmed N, Rao US, et al. p glyoprotein sub-strates andantagonists cluster into two distinct groups, Phama-col Exp Ther, 1997;51: 10241 22 Gilles K, Shi LM, Ramu A.Quantitative struct ure activity re-lationship of multidrug esistance revelsal agents. PhamacolExp Ther, 1997; 52; 321 23 Julia AM, Roche H, Berlion M.Multidrug resistance ci cum-vention by a new triazi-noami nopipenidine deivative S9788 in??i tro; definition of the optimal schedule and comparison with ve-rapamil. Br J Cancer, 1994; 69: 868-75 24 Boesch D, Loor F.Extent and persistenccal P glycoprotein in-hi bition in mu ltidrug resistant P388 cells after exposue toresis-tance modifying agents. Anticancer Drug, 1994; 5; 229-35 25 Cardarelli co, Aksentijevich I, Pastan I, et al. Differential ef-fects of P glycopiotein inhibitors on NIH3T3 cells transfectedwith wild-type (G185) or mutant (V185) mu ltidrug trans-porters. Cancer Res, 1995; 55; 10860 26 Mechetner EB, Roninson IB. Efficient inhibition of P glycopo-tein mediated multidug esistance with a monoclonal antibody.Proc Natl Sci USA, 1992; 89; 5824 27 'lhierny AR, Rahman A, Dritschilo A. Overcoming multidrugresistance in human tumor cell using froe and liposomally eucapsulatedantisense oligodexy nuclootides. Biochem BiophysRes Commun, 1993; 190; 952 |