欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2003, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (5): 561-563.

• 研究原著 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉与硬膜外泵注芬太尼病人自控镇痛的疗效评价

张中军, 李亚丽, 郭继龙   

  1. 暨南大学医学院第二附属医院、深圳市人民医院麻醉科,深圳 518020,广东
  • 收稿日期:2003-05-20 修回日期:2003-06-05 出版日期:2003-10-26 发布日期:2020-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 张中军,男,硕士,副主任医师,从事临床麻醉及麻醉药理学研究。Tel:0755-25533018-2591 Email:luchydoczhang@hotmail.com

Efficacy evaluation ofPatient-controlled analgesia of intravenous or epi-dural fentanyl

ZHANG Zhong-Jun, LI Ya-LI, GUO Ji-Long   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,ShenzhenPeople' s Hospital& the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College,Jinan University,Shenzhen 518020,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2003-05-20 Revised:2003-06-05 Online:2003-10-26 Published:2020-11-19

摘要: 目的 比较术后静脉和硬膜外应用芬太尼病人自控镇痛(PCA)的临床效果和安全性。方法 40例经腹子宫切除术病人随机分为静脉注射芬太尼自控镇痛(PCIA)组和经硬膜外注射芬太尼自控镇痛(PCEA)组,每组 20 例。两组芬太尼负荷量都是50μg 。PCA 药物配方为芬太尼 1 000μg +氟哌啶5 mg +0.9%氯 化钠 至 100 ml。 持 续 给药 注 速1 ml·h-1,单次PCA 剂量 1 ml,锁定时间 15 min。术后定时进行镇痛及镇静评分和患者满意度调查,观察 48 hPCA 需求按压和有效按压次数,以及芬太尼用量和不良反应。结果PCIA 组 48 h 内药物用量 、需求按压和有效按压次数均明显少于PCEA 组(P<0.05)。两组病人均可取得满意的镇痛和镇静效果,在PCA 泵使用后 12 h 内,PCIA 组视觉模拟法(VAS)疼痛评分及 Ramesay 镇静评分与PCEA 组有显著差异(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率无明显差异 。PCIA 和PCEA 组病人对术后镇痛的总体满意度分别为90%和 85%。结论 芬太尼用于术后镇痛安全有效,且PCIA 组优于PCEA 组。

关键词: 药效学, 芬太尼, 镇痛, 静脉内, 硬膜外, 疗效评价

Abstract: AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety ofPatient-controlled analgesia (PCA)of intravenous or epidural fentanyl.METHODS: 40Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy were randomly allocated toPatient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA)grouP(n =20)andPatient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA)group(n =20).ThePCA solution consisted of fentanyl 1 000μg,droperidol 5mg and NS 78 ml,loading dose of fenta-nyl 50μg,background infusion 1 ml·h-1,bolus 1 ml,andlockout time 15 min.The scores ofPain and seda-tion,the number ofPCA demand and delivery,fentanyl consumption,side effects andPatient' s satisfaction were assessed for 48 hours.RESULTS: The total dosage of fentanyl used,the number ofPCA demand and delivery in 48 hours were obviously smaller inPCIA grouPthan inPCEA grouP(P<0.05).Two groups gained satisfactoryPain relief and sedation,but during 12 hours afterPCAPumpswere used,significant differences were found be-tween two groups on VAS and Ramesay sedation scores(P<0.05).There was no marked difference on side ef-fects between two groups.The overall satisfaction of thePatients in two groups aboutPostoperative analgesia was 90%inPCIA and 85% inPCEA,respectively.CON-CLUSION: Fentanyl forPostoperativePain relief is a safe and effective agent,butPCIA with fentanyl is better thanPCEA with fentanyl forPostoperative analgesia.

Key words: pharmacodynamics, fentanyl, analge-sia, intravenous, epidural, efficacy evaluation

中图分类号: