欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2013, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 175-180.

• 定量药理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

肿瘤药物临床试验中成组序贯设计的统计学考虑

郭洋, 蒋志伟, 夏结来, 王玉琨   

  1. 第四军医大学卫生统计教研室,西安 710032,陕西
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-02 修回日期:2012-07-02 发布日期:2013-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 王玉琨,通信作者,男,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事药物临床试验中的统计设计与方法。 Tel: 029-84776811 E-mail: wangyk@fmmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郭洋,男,硕士,主要从事药物临床试验中的统计设计与方法。 Tel: 029-84774904 E-mail: Tigflanker@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81072390,81001290)

Statistical considerations of group sequential design in oncology clinical trials

GUO Yang, JIANG Zhi-wei, XIA Jie-lai, WANG Yu-kun   

  1. Department of Health Statics, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2012-07-02 Revised:2012-07-02 Published:2013-02-28

摘要: 成组序贯设计因其拥有较少的病例样本数和较早终止试验的可能性成为肿瘤药物临床试验设计方法的较好选择。如何科学有效地设计和应用成组序贯设计,本文通过Monte Carlo试验模拟,探讨肿瘤药物临床试验中成组序贯设计的期中分析次数、实施时间以及α消耗函数选取等问题,为读者系统指明如何去规划一次成组序贯试验以及如何确定其最优的试验参数。模拟结果表明,成组序贯设计以时间点2∶1∶1折半划分的三次期中分析为好,其期望样本含量仅为 420.53。Lan-Demets的五种α消耗函数中,1.5 次幂和2次幂的α消耗函数拥有最小期望样本含量约393例,相对于O'Brien-Fleming设计和Pocock设计在整体上更显优势。

关键词: 肿瘤临床试验, 成组序贯设计, 期中分析, 样本量估计

Abstract: The group sequential design is a good choice of oncology trial design because of the smaller sample size and the probability of early stopping for efficacy/futility. To design and apply the group sequential trials scientifically, we illustrate how to choose the number, timing of interim analysis, alpha spending function and optimal trial parameters by employing Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation results show that the three-stage design of 2∶1∶1 time point, whose expected sample size is 420.53, is the best choice in the group sequential design. And the expect sample size is only 420.53. Among the five α spending functions proposed by Lan and DeMets, the 1.5th power and quadratic α spending function, which have the smallest expect sample size of 393 cases, are better than O'Brien-Fleming and Pocock design.

Key words: Oncology clinical trial, Group sequential design, Interim analysis, Sample size estimation

中图分类号: