中频脉冲电疗法治疗经外周静脉置入中心静脉置管致静脉炎的疗效观察

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2014, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 313-316.

中频脉冲电疗法治疗经外周静脉置入中心静脉置管致静脉炎的疗效观察

王清华¹, 孙爱萍¹, 许业松¹, 鲍仕凤², 谢发琴², 詹凤丽³, 余正芝², 蔡靖²

¹皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院康复医学科,芜湖 241000,安徽;
²肿瘤内科,芜湖 241000,安徽;
³放疗科,芜湖 241000,安徽

收稿日期:2013-09-07 修回日期:2014-03-15 出版日期:2014-03-26 发布日期:2014-04-10
作者简介:王清华,女,学士,副主任医师,研究方向:神经系统病损康复。E-mail: 729654796@ qq.com
基金资助:
皖南医学院弋矶山医院三新项目(SX2010025)

Effects of intermediate frequency pulse electric therapy on phlebitis caused by PICC

WANG Qing-hua¹, SUN Ai-ping¹, XU Ye-song¹, BAO Shi-feng², XIE Fa-qing², ZHANG Feng-li³, YU Zheng-zhi², CAI Jing²

¹Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Wuhu 241001, Anhui,China;
²Internal Medicine-Oncology,Wuhu 241001, Anhui,China;
³Department of Radiotherapy,Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 241001, Anhui,China

Received:2013-09-07 Revised:2014-03-15 Online:2014-03-26 Published:2014-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 探讨中频脉冲电疗法治疗经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)所致静脉炎的效果。方法: 将90例PICC致静脉炎的患者采用随机数字表法分为3组,每组30例, A组给予中频脉冲电疗法,B组给予康惠尔透明贴疗法,C组给予湿热敷疗法,观察患者在治疗第3天、5天、7天后疼痛与肿胀缓解情况、治愈率情况。结果: 3组疗法治疗第3天、5天、7天后疼痛缓解程度比较;治疗5天、7天后肿胀缓解程度比较;治疗7天后治愈率比较均示A组治疗明显优于B、C组治疗(P均<0.05,P<0.01)。结论: 中频脉冲电疗法治疗PICC致静脉炎能尽早地减轻患者局部疼痛、肿胀,治愈率明显优于康惠尔透明贴法与湿热敷法,值得临床开展与推广。

关键词: 中频脉冲电疗法, 经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管, 静脉炎

Abstract: AIM: To explore the effect of intermediate frequency pulse electric therapy on Phlebitis caused by peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC).METHODS: Ninety cases of phlebitis caused by PICC were randomly divided into 3 groups (group A, B and C,n=30). Group A, B and C were treated by intermediate frequency pulse electric therapy, Kang whirlpool posted therapy and moist heat therapy respectively.The degree of pain, swelling and the cure rate were observed on the 3rd day, 5th day and 7th day after treatment.RESULTS: The reduced level of pain among the three groups on the 3rd day, 5th day and 7th day was statistically significant (P<0.01 for all). The difference of the eliminated degree of swelling on the 5th day and 7th day was statistically significant (P<0.01). The cure rate was statistically significant different on the 7th day. The better effect of the treatment was observed in group A comparing with group B or C (P<0.01),but there was no obvious difference between group B and C (P>0.05).CONCLUSION: The intermediate frequency pulse electric therapy is effective in alleviating local pain and swelling, and shows a better effect in the treatment of phlebitis caused by PICC than kang whirlpool transparent stickers or moist heat,and this method is worthly being recommended in the clinical application.

Key words: the intermediate frequency pulse electric therapy, PICC, phlebitis

中图分类号:

R454

王清华, 孙爱萍, 许业松, 鲍仕凤, 谢发琴, 詹凤丽, 余正芝, 蔡靖. 中频脉冲电疗法治疗经外周静脉置入中心静脉置管致静脉炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2014, 19(3): 313-316.

WANG Qing-hua, SUN Ai-ping, XU Ye-song, BAO Shi-feng, XIE Fa-qing, ZHANG Feng-li, YU Zheng-zhi, CAI Jing. Effects of intermediate frequency pulse electric therapy on phlebitis caused by PICC[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2014, 19(3): 313-316.

[1]	郭祖峰, 张帮慧, 程静. 射频透热联合化疗治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床评价[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2004, 9(9): 1065-1068.
[2]	谢明星, 王新房, 朱向明, 杨娅, 吕清, 陈立新, 聂绍平, 蒋桔泉, 曹林生. 急性心肌缺血激光心肌血管重建术与碱性成纤维生长因子联合应用对心脏功能及心肌存活性影响的实验研究¹[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2003, 8(2): 149-154.
[3]	韩金旺, 杨浩, 曹蘅, 王安才, 俞国华, 芮世宝, 黄家胜. 射频消融治疗房室折返性心动过速[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2003, 8(2): 195-197.
[4]	程敏. 主动脉内球囊反搏治疗高危急性心肌梗死 33 例[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2002, 7(1): 78-78.
[5]	鲍敏敏. 多功能微波手术治疗仪治疗皮肤病72例[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 1998, 3(3): 171-171.
[6]	蔡平, 杨石康. 高血压病患者左室充盈类型与几何形态及功能变化评价[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2005, 10(8): 894-897.
[7]	王建湘. 中医辨证加熏洗治疗小腿湿疹临床疗效分析[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2003, 8(1): 104-106.