欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2015, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 167-174.

• 定量药理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利西拉来治疗2型糖尿病的有效性及安全性的Meta分析

伍艳1, 吴翠芳2, 汪江林2   

  1. 1长沙市望城区人民医院药剂科;
    2中南大学湘雅三医院药学部,长沙 410013,湖南
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-22 修回日期:2014-05-30 出版日期:2015-02-26 发布日期:2015-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 汪江林,女,硕士研究生,研究方向:临床药学。Tel: 18774940040 E-mail: 524753872@qq.com
  • 作者简介:伍艳,女,本科,副主任药师,主要从事临床药学工作。Tel: 13707319169 E-mail: 36179684@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81102512);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(2014zzts316);新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助(NCET-13-0605)

Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide in comparison to placebo: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

WU Yan1, WU Cui-fang2, WANG Jiang-lin2   

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, the People's Hospital of Wangcheng District;
    2Department of Parmacy, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan,China
  • Received:2014-02-22 Revised:2014-05-30 Online:2015-02-26 Published:2015-03-20

摘要: 目的: 系统评价利西拉来与安慰剂比较治疗2型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。方法: 计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、OVID、Cochrane、CNKI、VIP、CBM数据库,查找利西拉来与安慰剂比较治疗2型糖尿病的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT),对纳入研究进行方法学质量评价,并用RevMan 5.2 软件进行Meta分析。通过Stata 12.0 软件对其是否对称按Begg's法进行分析,另外通过考察单项研究对总合并效应量的影响来进行敏感性分析,以评价结论的稳健性。结果: 共纳入8个RCT,随访时间≤24周的Meta分析结果显示:利西拉来在控制糖化血红蛋白(hemoglobin A1C,HbA1c)<7%[RR=1.96,95%CI(1.65,2.32),P<0.00001,Z=7.79]或≤6.5%[RR=2.70,95%CI(2.26,3.23),P<0.00001,Z=10.83]的达标率方面均优于安慰剂组。总不良反应及低血糖、注射部位反应、胃肠道反应、恶心、呕吐、头晕的发生率与安慰剂组相比,利西拉来组均高于安慰剂。头痛、腹泻的发生率两组相似,无统计学差异。所有不良反应均较轻微,绝大多数患者可以耐受。随访时间为76周时,Meta分析结果显示:利西拉来在控制糖化血红蛋白<7%[ RR=1.30,95%CI(1.12,1.51),P=0.0005,Z=3.49]或≤6.5%[ RR=1.41,95%CI(1.12,1.78),P=0.004,Z=2.89]的达标率方面均优于安慰剂组。总不良反应、注射部位反应、胃肠道反应、恶心、呕吐的发生率与安慰剂组相比,利西拉来组均高于安慰剂,而低血糖、腹泻两组无明显差异。结论: 利西拉来可以有效控制2型糖尿病患者血糖,利西拉来主要的不良反应是低血糖、注射部位反应、胃肠道反应、恶心、呕吐、头晕、头痛、腹泻,但不良反应较轻微,因此可以用来治疗2型糖尿病,但远期结果有待高质量、大样本、长期随访的临床研究予以验证。

关键词: 利西拉来, 2 型糖尿病, 随机对照试验, Meta分析

Abstract: AIM: To estimate the efficacy and tolerability of lixisenatide in comparison to placebo in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP, CBM were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCT) of lixisenatide vs. placebo in treating type 2 diabetes were collected. The quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed and then analyzed by the software RevMan5.2. The potential publication bias was performed by Stata 12.0 soft. Sensitivity analyses were used in the treatment course.RESULTS: Eight RCTs were ultimately identified. The results of meta-analyses showed that the proportion of patients that achieved an HbA1c <7%or≤6.5% was significantly greater in lixisenatide group than that in placebo group, there was statistical significance. The number of total adverse events, hypoglycemia, injection sites reactions, gastrointestinal disorders, nausea, vomiting, dizziness events in lixisenatide group was significantly lower than that in control group, there was statistical significance. Most of the adverse events reported were mild to moderate in intensity.CONCLUSION: The results of meta-analyses indicate that lixisenatide treatment for type 2 diabetes is effective. The major adverse of lixisenatide were hypoglycemia, injection site reactions, gastrointestinal disorders, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, diarrhea. Although it may increase the risk of the adverse events,which reported were mild to moderate in intensity, lixisenatide appears to be an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes and a long-term study in large scale with high quality is required to confirm its long-term outcomes.

Key words: lixisenatide, type 2 diabetes, randomized controlled trials, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: