3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0131

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 822-827.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0131

3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究

张显达^1*, 李雪^2*, 廖敏^3*

1.香港教育大学语言学及现代语系教授兼语言学及语言研究中心,香港 999077;
2.成都体育学院运动医学与健康学院,四川成都 610041;
3.首都经济贸易大学密云分校英语教研室,北京 101500

收稿日期:2022-01-28 修回日期:2022-03-31 发布日期:2022-08-17 出版日期:2022-08-10
作者简介:张显达(1961-),男,教授,主任,主要研究方向为儿童语言发展及发展障碍;李雪(1978-),女,教授,主要研究方向为运动促进脑健康;廖敏(1981-),女,副教授,主要研究方向为儿童语言习得与障碍。注:^*共同第一作者。

Reliability and validity of grammar subscale of Children's Language Development Scale

CHEUNG Hin-Tat^1*, LI Xue^2*, LIAO Min^3*

1. Department of Linguistics and Modern Language Studies, the Education University of Hong Kong, Hongkong 999077,China;
2. School of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,China;
3. English Teaching and Research Section, Miyun Campus of Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 101500, China

Received:2022-01-28 Revised:2022-03-31 Online:2022-08-10 Published:2022-08-17
Contact: CHEUNG Hin-Tat, E-mail:hintat.htc@gmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇进行信效度检验。方法 2018年12月—2019年6月期间,采用整群随机抽样的方法,抽取成都地区幼儿园1 704名2岁11个月—6岁11个月幼儿,其中男女各852名。采用3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇对幼儿进行测评,并对量表进行信效度分析。结果共回收有效数据1 701份。语法篇包含40个听句选图项目。内部一致性信度 Cronbach's α系数为 0.834,折半信度为0.795。项目数据整体质量检验,被试及项目Infit、Outfit MNSQ值分别为1.00、0.93及0.99、0.93。被试区分度为1.73,被试信度为0.75。40个项目的Infit MNSQ值均介于0.86和1.2 logits之间,与Rasch模型拟合好。项目难度值在-2.55至1.82 logits之间,被试个体能力值在-2.78至5.0 logits之间。结论儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇信效度良好,可用于对中国3~6岁儿童语法发展水平进行测评,本量表能简便、有效地测量儿童语法发展情况,为中国儿童语言障碍的诊断和治疗提供参考。

关键词: 汉语, 儿童语言发育评估量表, 语法, 信效度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of grammar subscale of Children's Language Development Scale(CLDS). Methods A stratified cluster sampling method was adopted to randomly select 1 704 preschool children(including 852 boys and 852 girls) in Chengdu from December 2018 to June 2019. Children's language ability was evaluated with CLDS, then the reliability and validity of the grammar subscale of CLDS were tested. Results There were 1 701 completed Results in sum. The grammar scale contained 40 items of picture selection after listening to a sentence. Internal consistency reliability Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.834, and the half-fold reliability was 0.795. The infit and outfit MNSQ values of the subjects and the items were 1.00, 0.93 and 0.99, 0.93 respectively. The discrimination validity was 1.73, and the reliability of the scale was 0.75. The infit MNSQ values of 40 items were between 0.86 and 1.2 logits, which fitted well with the Rasch model. The difficulty value of items ranged from -2.55 to 1.82 logits, and the individual ability value was between -2.78 and 5.0 logits. Conclusions The grammar subscale of the CLDS has good reliability and validity. It can be applied to simply and effectively measure 3- to 6-year-old children's grammar development, so as to provide reference for diagnosing and treating speech and language disorders in Chinese children.

Key words: Chinese, Children's Language Development Scale, grammar, reliability and validity

中图分类号:

R179

张显达, 李雪, 廖敏. 3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 822-827.

CHEUNG Hin-Tat, LI Xue, LIAO Min. Reliability and validity of grammar subscale of Children's Language Development Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2022, 30(8): 822-827.

参考文献

[1] Diepeveen FB, van Dommelen P, Oudesluys-Murphy AM, et al. Children with specific language impairment are more likely to reach motor milestones late[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2018, 44(6):857-862.
[2] Feldman HM. How young children learn language and speech[J]. Pediatr Rev, 2019, 40(8):398-411.
[3] Gervain J. Typical language development[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2020, 173:171-183.
[4] Visser-Bochane MI, Reijneveld SA, Krijnen WP, et al. Identifying milestones in language development for young children ages 1 to 6 years[J]. Acad Pediatr, 2020, 20(3):421-429.
[5] Liu XL, De Villiers J, Ning C, et al. Research to establish the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of a comprehensive language assessment of mandarin[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2017, 60(3):592-606.
[6] 刘雪曼. 语言发育迟缓和语言障碍以及相关发育障碍性疾病的综合评估及鉴别诊断的临床思考框架[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2021, 59(11):901-904.
[7] Matuszkiewicz M, Gałkowski T. Developmental language disorder and uninhibited primitive reflexes in young children[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2021, 64(3):935-948.
[8] Mcgregor KK. How we fail children with developmental language disorder[J]. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 2020, 51(4):981-992.
[9] Wiefferink K, Van BC, Wegener SB, et al. Children with language delay referred to Dutch speech and hearing centres: caseload characteristics[J]. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 2020, 55(4):573-582.
[10] Norbury CF, Gooch D, Wray C, et al. The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2016, 57(11):1247-1257.
[11] Collisson BA, Graham SA, Preston JL, et al. Risk and protective factors for late talking: an epidemiologic investigation[J]. J Pediatr, 2016, 172:168-174.
[12] 单丹丹, 刘晓娟, 白银燕. 2017～2019年郑州市部分城区学龄前儿童语言发育迟缓的患病情况及危险因素分析[J]. 中国中西医结合儿科学, 2021, 13(6):465-468.
[13] 张颖, 王俊峰, 丁艳华. 儿童语言发育迟缓的临床特征和高危因素研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022,30(8):912-915.
[14] Miller ML, Williams BM, Mccabe JE, et al. Perinatal anxiety and depressive symptoms and perception of child behavior and temperament in early motherhood[J]. J Dev Orig Health Dis, 2021, 12(3):513-522.
[15] Winstanley M, Webb RT, Conti-Ramsden G. Developmental language disorders and risk of recidivism among young offenders[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2021, 62(4):396-403.
[16] Pindzola RH, Plexico LW, Haynes WO. Diagnosis and evaluation in speech pathology-ninth edition[M]. San Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc, 2015:146-149.
[17] 张庆苏. 语言发育迟缓的检查——基于符号与指示内容关系的评估[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2019, 17(6):469-471.
[18] Soli SD, Zheng Y, Meng Z, et al. Clinical assessment of early language development:A simplified short form of the Mandarin communicative development inventory[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2012, 76(9):1255-1264.
[19] 王安, 陈德枝, 周兢. 皮博迪图片词汇测验中文修订版的结构效度分析——基于五省份学前儿童测评结果[J]. 幼儿教育, 2021,39(4):19-23.
[20] 郭璇, 朱远来, 焦小燕, 等. 汉语版、哈萨克语版皮博迪图片词汇测验第四版的效度与信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 32(10):841-847.
[21] 郭璇, 盖笑松, 张百灵, 等. 汉语版和哈萨克语版表达性词汇测验第二版的效度与信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2018, 33(11):845-850.
[22] Weiler B, Schuele CM. Tense marking in the kindergarten population:Testing the bimodal distribution hypothesis[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2021, 64(2):593-612.
[23] Schwob S, Eddé L, Jacquin L, et al. Using nonword repetition to ldentify developmental language disorder in monolingual and bilingual children:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2021, 64(9):3578-3593.
[24] 陆烁, 丘国新, 钱思宇, 等. 面向语言障碍筛查的汉语儿童言语交际水平评估系统研发 [J]. 语言战略研究, 2021,6(1):45-58.
[25] Brinchmann EI, Braeken J, Lyster SH. Is there a direct relation between the development of vocabulary and grammar?[J]. Dev Sci, 2019, 22(1):e12709.
[26] Eisenberg SL, Guo LY. Differentiating children with and without language impairment based on grammaticality[J]. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 2013, 44(1):20-31.
[27] Boone WJ, Staver JR, Yale MS. Rasch analysis in the human sciences[M]. London: Springer,2014:181-245.
[28] Dabaghi S, Esmaielzadeh F, Rohani C. Application of Rasch analysis for development and psychometric properties of adolescents' quality of life instruments:A systematic review[J]. Adolesc Health Med Ther, 2020, 11:173-197.
[29] 章依文, 金星明, 沈晓明, 等. 2~4岁儿童语言发育的抽样调查[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志,2006, 21(3):203-205.
[30] 金志娟, 金星明. 儿童语言发育进程中语法的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2008, 16(2):192-196.
[31] Coloma CJ, De Barbieri Z, Quezada C, et al. The impact of vocabulary, grammar and decoding on reading comprehension among children with SLI:A longitudinal study[J]. J Commun Disord, 2020, 86:106002.
[32] Baylor C, Hula W, Donovan NJ, et al. An introduction to item response theory and Rasch models for speech-language pathologists[J]. Am J of Speech Lang Pathol, 2011, 20(3):243-259.
[33] 武法提, 田浩, 王瑜, 等.智慧教育视野下基于Rasch模型的知识掌握与认知能力分析研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报:教育科学版,2021,39(8):57-68.
[34] Sze F, Wei MX, Lam D. Development of the Hong Kong sign language sentence repetition test[J]. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, 2020, 25(3):298-317.

3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究

Reliability and validity of grammar subscale of Children's Language Development Scale

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘慧娟, 宋志霄, 高南南, 张莉, 孙瑾, 乔秀芸, 柯佳媚, 李燕. 2～6岁儿童词汇和语法发展现状及相关因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 724-730.
[2]	尹晓辉, 王葳, 张姣姣, 王洋, 许亚红. 父亲参与婴儿教养量表的汉化[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 369-373.
[3]	郭旭宁, 普迎琦, 马静文, 潘宁, 范晓萱, 徐小雨, 金钰莹, 郭仰峰, 李秀红. 三~五年级阅读障碍儿童的识字量和识字错误类型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1315-1321.
[4]	胡晓云, 王琦, 陈玉霞, 郭仰峰, 吴静, 李秀红. 汉语发育性阅读障碍儿童多种认知加工缺陷初探[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(4): 357-360.
[5]	花静,朱丽萍,董海燕,杜莉. 青少年友好服务情况评估量表的临床应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2015, 23(3): 227-230.
[6]	周志远. 菏泽市713例2~4岁儿童语言发育调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2012, 20(10): 931-933.
[7]	朱冬梅,王晶,吴汉荣. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的转换功能研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(3): 207-209.
[8]	李红辉,陈晨,林墨菊,全琰,乔桂香,肖莉娜. 阅读训练对汉语阅读障碍儿童事件相关电位的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(12): 1136-1138.
[9]	骆艳,王晶,吴汉荣. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视空间工作记忆与语言认知相关性的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(10): 881-883.
[10]	黄玲娟,金宇,李诗韵. 2岁以内孤独症谱系障碍儿童筛查工具的研究现状[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(10): 915-917.