早产小于胎龄儿临床及危险因素分析

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0600

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 261-264.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0600

早产小于胎龄儿临床及危险因素分析

钟庆华, 段江, 曾洁, 梁琨, 齐志业, 宋玖珊

昆明医科大学第一附属医院儿科,云南昆明 650031

收稿日期:2019-05-04 发布日期:2020-03-10 出版日期:2020-03-10
通讯作者: 段江,E-mail:jetduan@126.com
作者简介:钟庆华(1976-),女,云南人,硕士学位,主治医师,主要从事新生儿疾病的临床与研究工作。
基金资助:
云南省高层次卫生技术人才培养(学科带头人)基金(D-201609);云南省卫生科技计划项目(2018NS0144)

Analysis of clinical and risk factors for preterm birth less than gestational age

ZHONG Qing-hua, DUAN Jiang, ZENG Jie, LIANG Kun, QI Zhi-ye, SONG Jiu-shan

Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650031, China

Received:2019-05-04 Online:2020-03-10 Published:2020-03-10
Contact: DUAN Jiang, E-mail: jetduan@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析早产小于胎龄儿(SGA)与适于胎龄儿(AGA)高危因素、发病情况的差异,为早产SGA进行临床干预提供依据。方法选取2011年l月-2017年12月昆明医科大学第一附属医院新生儿科收治的1 370例早产儿为研究对象,根据胎龄与出生体重的关系分为SGA组(675例)与AGA组(695例),比较两组早产儿的一般情况、围生期高危因素及并发症情况。结果 1)SGA组出生体重、出生身长、出生头围、出院体重、出院身长均小于AGA组,住院天数较AGA组长,差异均有统计学意义(χ² =-11.62、-7.12、-5.25、-5.72、-2.1、4.46,P＜0.05);2)SGA组其母系高龄产妇、妊娠高血压综合征、胎盘异常、剖宫产与AGA组相比较差异均有统计学意义(t=65.841、170.937、19.558、92.719,P＜0.05);3)早产SGA组并发窒息、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征、心肌损伤、喂养不耐受、肺炎、败血症、低血糖、低甲状腺素血症的比例高于AGA组,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.465、4.162、6.035、3.97、5.180、5.21、4.71、5.031,P＜0.05);4)Logistic 回归分析显示:母亲患妊娠期高血压(OR=5.64,95%CI:1.28~16.16)、胎盘异常(OR=3.65,95%CI:1.16~7.69)、多胎妊娠(OR=2.89,95%CI:1.05~8.84)是早产SGA发生的独立危险因素。结论加强孕期保健、胎儿宫内监测,及时发现胎儿宫内生长发育迟缓,对孕母进行积极治疗,有助于减少早产SGA的发生;加强早产SGA的监护治疗,可降低其并发症的发生。

关键词: 小于胎龄儿, 早产儿, 适于胎龄儿, 高危因素, 并发症

Abstract: Objective To investigate the risk factors of pretermsmall for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA),and to provide basis for clinical intervention in preterm SGA. Methods A total of 1 370 preterm infants admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2011 to December 2017 were enrolled. The relationship between gestational age and birth weight was divided into SGA group (675 cases) and AGA group (695 cases). The general situation of premature infants in the two groups,perinatal high risk factors and complications were compared. Results 1) Birth weight,birth length,birth head circumference,discharge weight,discharge length of SGA group were less than those of AGA group.Hospitalization days in SGA group were longer than that in AGA group,the difference was statistically significant (χ² =-11.62、-7.12、-5.25、-5.72、-2.1、4.46,P<0.05);2)There were significant differences between SGA group and AGA group in maternal age maternal,pregnancy-induced hypertension syndrome,placental abnormality,cesarean section (t=65.841,170.937,19.558,92.719,P＜0.05); 3) The incidence of asphyxia,neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,myocardial injury,feeding intolerance,pneumonia sepsis,hypoglycemia and hypothyroxinemia in preterm SGA group were signigicantly higher than that in AGA group (t=4.465、4.162、6.035、3.97、5.180、5.21、4.71、5.031,P＜0.05);4) Logistic regression analysis indicated that the mother with gestational hypertension (OR=5.64,95%CI:1.28-16.16),placental abnormality (OR=3.65,95%CI:1.16-7.69),multiple pregnancy (OR=2.89,95%CI:1.05-8.84) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of premature SGA. Conclusion Strengthening pregnancy health care,intrauterine monitoring,timely detection of intrauterine growth retardation,active treatment of pregnant mothers can help reduce the incidence of premature SGA; strengthening the monitoring of premature delivery of SGA can reduce the occurrence of complications.

Key words: small for gestational age, premature infants, appropriate for gestational age, high risk factors, complications

中图分类号:

R722.6

钟庆华, 段江, 曾洁, 梁琨, 齐志业, 宋玖珊. 早产小于胎龄儿临床及危险因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(3): 261-264.

ZHONG Qing-hua, DUAN Jiang, ZENG Jie, LIANG Kun, QI Zhi-ye, SONG Jiu-shan. Analysis of clinical and risk factors for preterm birth less than gestational age[J]. journal1, 2020, 28(3): 261-264.

参考文献

[1] Lee PA,Chernausek SD,Hokken-Koelega AC,et al.International small for gestational age advisory board consensus development conference statement:management of short children born small for gestational age,April 24-October 1,2001 [J].Pediatrics,2003,111(6):1253-1261.
[2] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕,等.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社2011:234-239.
[3] 王庆红,杨于嘉,魏克伦,等.我国小于胎龄儿现状分析[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2009,24(3):177-1780.
[4] Männik J,Vaas P,Rull K,et al.Differential expression profile of growth hormone/chorionic somatomammotropin genes in placenta of small-and large-for-gestational-age newborns [J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2010,95(5):2433-2442.
[5] Iñiguez G,Ong K,Bazaes R,et al.Longitudinal changes in insulin-like growth factor-I,insulin sensitivity,and secretion from birth to age three years in small-for-gestational-age children [J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2006,91(11):4645-4649.
[6] Howarth C,Gazis A,James D.Associations of type 1 diabetes mellitus,maternal vascular disease and complications of pregnancy [J].Diabet Med,2007,24(11):1229-1234.
[7] 胡旭红,罗晓红,郑毅.TGF-β1与妊娠高血压母亲胎儿宫内生长发育迟缓的相关性研究[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2015,23(8):73-76.
[8] 李丽,明岩,叶萍.胎儿宫内生长发育迟缓与血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素及胎盘异铁蛋白水平的关系 [J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(27):4433-4435.
[9] Campbell MK,Cartier S,Xie B,et al Determinants of small for gestational age birth at term [J].Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology,2012,26(6):525-533.
[10] Burstein E,Sheiner E,Mazor M,et al.Identifying risk factors for premature rupture of membranes in small for gestational age neonates:a population-based study [J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2008,21(11):816-820.
[11] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[12] 徐易弟,陈莹,范艳卿,等.新生儿窒息的原因分析及预防措施 [J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(14):3220-3221.
[13] 曹玮,张永红,赵冬莹.34 周以下早产儿宫外生长发育迟缓发生的影响因素[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2015,17(5),453-458.
[14] 黄地纬.早产小于胎龄儿生长代谢及高危因素的临床研究 [D].昆明:昆明医科大学,2015.
[15] Sharma AA,Jen R,Brant R,et al.Hierarchical maturation of innate immune defences in very preterm neonates [J].Neonatology,2014,106(1):1-9.

早产小于胎龄儿临床及危险因素分析

Analysis of clinical and risk factors for preterm birth less than gestational age

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李茗竹, 王静, 谢多双. 小于胎龄儿过快追赶生长与儿童期肥胖关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 751-755.
[2]	张丹, 张军, 杨钰荣, 曹咪, 闫敬敏, 朱璐阳. 肠道菌群与早产儿脑发育及神经认知行为关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 756-759.
[3]	潘婷, 张萱. 双胎小于胎龄儿生长发育及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 760-765.
[4]	冯骁, 陈凌, 赵红缨, 黄蕊, 林辰曦, 庄丽娟. 不同脐带挤压方式对极早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 794-798.
[5]	郑亭玉, 张春宇, 杨飞, 郑芳, 张梦霞, 夏露萍, 徐孙超. 营养支持小组管理模式对早产儿生长发育及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 555-558.
[6]	王晓庆, 刘九月, 姚光. 小于胎龄儿早期脑发育及18~24月龄时神经发育状况的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 353-358.
[7]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[8]	李静兰, 孙文强, 朱雪萍. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良相关预测模型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 395-398.
[9]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[10]	任力, 黑明燕, 齐宇洁, 靳绯, 翁景文, 董世霄, 沈艳华, 姜敏. 早产儿喂养对坏死性小肠结肠炎发病的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 438-441.
[11]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[12]	王晶, 项思嘉, 鲁莹, 杨蕾, 胡小沙, 钱君, 池霞, 张敏. 早产儿3周岁体格生长及体成分分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 457-460.
[13]	郑水英, 罗艳赟. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床表现及相关影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 461-464.
[14]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[15]	何小颖, 吴翠玲, 曾玲艳, 綦美姣, 孙亚莲. 早产儿食物转换对血清营养素水平的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 81-85.