中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 566-548.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-06-03

• 科研论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

留守儿童健康危险行为的易感性及其与家庭环境的关系

刘衔华1, 2, 燕良轼1, 胡义秋3, 孙焕良3   

  1. 1 湖南师范大学教育科学学院, 湖南 长沙 410081;
    2 衡阳师范学院教育科学系, 湖南 衡阳 421002;
    3 湖南农业大学教育学院, 湖南 长沙 410128
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-25 发布日期:2014-06-10 出版日期:2014-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 燕良轼, E-mail:yanls89119@yahoo.com.cn
  • 作者简介:刘衔华(1968-), 男, 湖南人, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 主要研究方向为健康心理学。
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学“十二五”规划课题(BKA120087);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(12YBA037, 11YBB0194)。

Research on the vulnerability of health risk behavior in left-behind children and its relationship with family environment.

LIU Xian-hua1, 2, YAN Liang-shi1, HU Yi-qiu3, SUN Huan-liang3.   

  1. 1 College of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China;
    2 Department of Educational Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, Hunan 421002, China;
    3 Educational College, Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, China
  • Received:2013-10-25 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-10
  • Contact: YAN Liang-shi, E-mail:yanls89119@yahoo.com.cn

摘要: 目的 探讨留守儿童健康危险行为的易感性及其家庭环境因素, 为其健康保健提供科学依据。方法 采用青少年健康相关危险行为问卷(Adolescent Health Related Risky Behavior Inventory, AHRBI)和中文版家庭环境量表(Family Environmental Scale-Chinese Version, FES-CV)对178名留守儿童和132名农村非留守儿童进行了测查。结果 1)留守儿童和农村非留守儿童在暴力攻击行为(F=9.320)、破坏纪律行为(F=8.961)、自杀自残行为(F=10.911)和健康妥协行为(F=9.144)四个因子上的差异均有高度统计学意义(P均<0.01);2)家庭环境可以预测留守儿童健康危险行为94%的变异, 其因果结构模型的适配度指标为χ2=40.396, RMSEA=0.047, GFI=0.961, NFI=0.933, PCFI=0.516。结论 留守儿童是健康危险行为的易感人群, 家庭环境是留守儿童健康危险行为发生的重要影响因素。

关键词: 留守儿童, 健康危险行为, 家庭环境

Abstract: Objective To explore the vulnerability of health risk behavior in left-behind children and its relationship with family environment. Methods A total of 310 children, including 178 left-behind children and 132 non-left-behind children were surveyed by Adolescent Health Related Risky Behavior Inventory (AHRBI) and Family Environmental Scale-Chinese Version (FES-CV). Results The left-behind children got more scores than the non-left-behind children in aggression and violence (F=9.320), rule broken (F=8.961), suicide and self-injury (F=10.911) and health-compromising behaviors (F=9.144), The differences had significiance (P all<0.01.2) Family environment of left-behind children could predict 94% variance of their health risk behavior, the structural equation modeling fitting analysis was brought outχ2=40.396, RMSEA=0.047, GFI=0.961, NFI=0.933, PCFI=0.516. Conclusion The left-behind children are most severely vulnerable to health risk behavior, and family environment is an important influencing factor of health risk behavior.

Key words: left-behind children, health risk behavior, family environment

中图分类号: