孤独症诊断观察量表模块1和儿童期孤独症评定量表的临床应用对比

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0613

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1181-1184.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0613

所属专题：孤独症谱系障碍

孤独症诊断观察量表模块1和儿童期孤独症评定量表的临床应用对比

吴满红, 徐宁, 常燕群, 温健, 娄语嫣, 黄双苗

广东省妇幼保健院儿童神经康复科,广东广州 510010

收稿日期:2022-05-15 修回日期:2022-08-17 发布日期:2022-11-09 出版日期:2022-11-10
通讯作者: 徐宁,E-mail:lynnxu1@live.cn
作者简介:吴满红(1981-),女,湖南人,副主任技师,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为婴幼儿神经损伤、神经心理发育的评估。
基金资助:
2021年广东省中医药局科研项目(20211047)。

Comparison of clinical application between Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition Module-1 and Children Autism Rating Scale in children with autism spectrum disorder

WU Man-hong, XU Ning, CHANG Yan-qun, WEN Jian, LOU Yu-yan, HUANG Shuang-miao

Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510010, China

Received:2022-05-15 Revised:2022-08-17 Online:2022-11-10 Published:2022-11-09
Contact: XU Ning, E-mail:lynnxu1@live.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析第二版孤独症诊断观察量表(ADOS-2)模块1与儿童期孤独症评定量表(CARS)对儿童孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断价值,为临床应用提供参考依据。方法 2019年1月—2022年3月在广东省妇幼保健院儿童神经康复医学科初次就诊,第一诊断为ASD、全面发育迟缓儿(GDD)及评估为正常的104例儿童为研究对象。其中ASD患儿60例(高、低功能各30例)为ASD组,24例全面发育迟缓患儿(GDD患儿)及正常儿20例为非ASD组,两组均采用ADOS-2模块1和CARS评估。比较两个量表与美国《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第5版)》(DSM-5)中ASD诊断结果的一致性,对比两者诊断ASD的敏感性、特异性。结果 1)ADOS-2模块1与DSM-5的一致性好(Kappa=0.862),CARS与DSM-5的一致性为中等(Kappa=0.509),ADOS-2模块1与CARS间的一致性为好(Kappa=0.695)。2)ADOS-2模块1的敏感性优于CARS,差异有统计学意义(χ²=13.333,P<0.001)。ADOS-2模块1在诊断IQ≥70和IQ<70的儿童中的敏感性、特异性的对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CARS在诊断IQ<70的儿童的敏感性优于IQ≥70的儿童(χ²=7.500,P=0.006),特异性比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ADOS-2 模块1、CARS均为辅助诊断ASD的重要工具,ADOS-2模块1在ASD儿童的早期诊断中具有更高的敏感性和特异性。临床工作中,对IQ≥70的儿童,建议降低CARS的诊断阈值,以提高CARS的诊断敏感性,降低漏诊率。

关键词: 孤独症, 孤独症诊断观察量表, 儿童孤独症评定量表

Abstract: Objective To compare the diagnostic value between Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition(ADOS-2) Module-1 and Children Autism Rating Scale (CARS) for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in order to provide reference for clinical application. Methods From January 2019 to March 2022, a total of 104 children who firstly visited and diagnosed in the Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital were enrolled in this study, including 60 ASD children (ASD group:30 cases of high function and 30 cases of low function,), 24 children with global developmental delay (GDD) and 20 normal children (non-ASD group). All children were assessed by ADOS-2 Module-1 and CARS. The consistency of diagnostic results between the two scales and the criteria of American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5(DSM-5) was evaluated, and the sensitivity and specificityof the two scales in the diagnosis of ASD were compared. Results 1) The consistency between ADOS-2 module 1 and DSM-5 was good (Kappa=0.862),as well as between ADOS-2 module 1 and CARS (Kappa=0.695).The consistency was medium between CARS and DSM-5 (Kappa=0.509), 2) The sensitivity of ADOS-2 module 1 was significantly better than that of CARS (χ²=13.333, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity between diagnosing children with IQ≥70 and children with IQ <70(P>0.05). The sensitivity of CARS in the diagnosis of children with IQ <70 was significantly better than that of children with IQ≥70 (χ²=7.500, P=0.006), but the specificity was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions ADOS-2 module-1 and CARS are both important tools to assist in the diagnosis of ASD, and ADOS-2 module-1 has higher sensitivity and specificity in the early diagnosis of ASD children. In clinical work, it is recommended to lower the diagnostic threshold of CARS for children with IQ ≥ 70 in order to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of CARS and reduce the rate of missed diagnosis.

Key words: autism, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Children Autism Rating Scale

中图分类号:

R749.94

吴满红, 徐宁, 常燕群, 温健, 娄语嫣, 黄双苗. 孤独症诊断观察量表模块1和儿童期孤独症评定量表的临床应用对比[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1181-1184.

WU Man-hong, XU Ning, CHANG Yan-qun, WEN Jian, LOU Yu-yan, HUANG Shuang-miao. Comparison of clinical application between Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition Module-1 and Children Autism Rating Scale in children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2022, 30(11): 1181-1184.

参考文献

[1] 肖婷,肖湘,储康康,等.中文版量化的婴幼儿孤独症筛查量表信效度研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2022,30(4):381-385.
[2] Kamp-Becker I, Albertowski K, Becker J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the ADOS and ADOS-2 in clinical practice[J].Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2018,27(9):1193-1207.
[3] 刘湘云.儿童保健学[M].4版.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2011.
[4] Arbanas G.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) [J]. Codas,2015,25:50-59.
[5] World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders. Clinical description and diagnostic guideline[R]. Geneva:WHO 1992:16.
[6] 陶国泰.儿童少年精神医学[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1999:124-125.
[7] 唐万,胡俊,张晖,等. Kappa系数:一种衡量评估者间一致性的常用方法 [J].上海精神医学,2015,27(1):62-67.
[8] Sanchez MJ, Constantino JN. Expediting clinician assessment in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2020, 62(7):806-812.
[9] Kanai C,Koyama T,Kato S,et al.Comparison of high-functioning atypical autism and childhood autism by Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Tokyo version[J].Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,2004,58(2):217-221.
[10] Özyurt G, Eliküçük ÇD. Comparison of Language Features, Autism spectrum symptoms in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, developmental language delay, and healthy controls[J]. Noro Psikiyatr Ars,2018,55(3):205-210.
[11] Hermawati D, Rahmadi FA, Sumekar TA, et al. Early electronic screen exposure and autistic-like symptoms[J].Intractable Rare Dis Res,2018,7(1):69-71.
[12] Medda JE, Cholemkery H, Freitag CM. Sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS-2 algorithm in a large german sample[J].Autism Dev Disord, 2019,49(2):750-761.
[13] Mazefsy CA,Oswald DP.The discriminative ability and diagnostic utility of the ADOS-G,ADI-R and GARS for children in a clinical setting[J].Autism,2006,10(6):533-549.
[14] Gotham K, Pickles A, Lord C. Trajectories of autism severity in children using standardized ADOS scores[J].Pediatrics,2012,130(5):1278 -1284.
[15] Lebersfeld JB, Swanson M, Clesi CD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in diagnosing autism spectrum disorders in children[J].Autism Dev Disord, 2021,51(11):4101-4114.
[16] Dawkins T, Meyer AT, van Bourgondien ME. The relationship between the Childhood Autism Rating Scale:Second Edition and Clinical Diagnosis Utilizing the DSM-Ⅳ-TR and the DSM-5[J].Autism Dev Disord, 2016,46(10):3361-3368.
[17] Rellini E, Tortolani D, Trillo S, et al. Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) correspondence and conflicts with DSM-Ⅳ criteria in diagnosis of autism[J]. Autism Dev Disord, 2004,34(6):703-708.
[18] Mayes SD,Calhoun SL, Murray MJ, et al. Comparison of scores on the Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorder, Childhood Autism Rating Scale, and Gilliam Asperger's Disorder Scale for children with low functioning autism, high functioning autism, Asperger's disorder, ADHD, and typical development[J]. Autism Dev Disord,2009,39(12):1682-1693.
[19] Perry A, Condillac RA, Freeman NL, et al. Multi-site study of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) in five clinical groups of young children[J].Autism Dev Disord,2005,35(5):625-634.
[20] de Giambattista C, Ventura P, Trerotoli P. Subtyping the autism spectrum disorder:Comparison of children with high functioning autism and asperger syndrome[J]. Autism Dev Disord,2019,49(1):138-150
[21] Randall M,Egberts KJ,Samtani A,et al. Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder(ASD) in preschool children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,7(7):CD009044.
[22] Brett D, Warnell F,Mc Conachie H. Factors affecting age at ASD Diagnosis in UK:No Evidence that diagnosis age has decreased between 2004 and 2014[J]. Autism Dev Disord,2016,46(6):1974-1984.
[23] 罗美芳,肖博,赵晓丽,等.儿童神经心理行为检查量表 2016 版在孤独症谱系障碍幼儿中的临床应用[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2020,22(5):494-498.
[24] Emerson ND, Morrell HER, Neece C. Predictors of age of diagnosis for children with autism spectrum disorder:The role of a consistent source of medical care, race, and condition severity[J].Autism Dev Disord, 2016,46(1):127-138.

孤独症诊断观察量表模块1和儿童期孤独症评定量表的临床应用对比

Comparison of clinical application between Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition Module-1 and Children Autism Rating Scale in children with autism spectrum disorder

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张超. 早期介入丹佛模式在不同病情程度孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复中的应用研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 736-740.
[2]	刘安南, 姜志梅. 孤独症谱系障碍各年龄段筛查工具研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 645-649.
[3]	黎梦晗, 李廷玉. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童感觉异常的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 650-655.
[4]	刘梦姣, 郑小琴, 孟仙, 吴晓玲, 葛冬梅, 聂晶. 2~5岁孤独症谱系障碍、疑似孤独症谱系障碍及全面发育迟缓儿童的智能特征分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6): 668-673.
[5]	李德欣, 陈强, 庄志成, 陈红, 杨秉娇, 姜顺香, 周翔. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童肠道菌群与症状严重程度相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 497-501.
[6]	王少雯, 张贻霞, 陈静静, 魏秀丽, 叶蓓, 方拴锋. Gesell发展诊断量表在语言相关的发育性疾病中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 442-445.
[7]	柯晓燕. 孤独症谱系障碍早期识别与早期诊断的现状与挑战[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 238-240.
[8]	宋超, 胡莉菲, 吴玲玲, 江忠权. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童合并智力功能缺陷的GBM预测模型构建与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 241-245.
[9]	李正, 肖贵元, 罗雅婷, 何春燕, 王念蓉, 赵妍. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童血清叶酸、维生素B12水平与肠道菌群的关联[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 246-251.
[10]	董海鹏, 杨思渊, 李伟栋, 余婧. 团体社交训练对孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复效果的影响因素及Nomogram预测模型构建[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 252-258.
[11]	赵丽华, 李晶. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童非典型人际同步表现及其神经机制[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 274-278.
[12]	赵英欣, 何凡, 郑毅. 肠道微生物干预在孤独症谱系障碍中的应用展望[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 279-283.
[13]	王静, 黄珊, 高雪婷. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童室内替代座椅干预研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 284-288.
[14]	林欢喜, 刘潘婷, 童梅玲, 池霞, 钱君, 洪琴. 父母介导的干预在孤独症谱系障碍治疗中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 304-310.
[15]	易爱文, 辛晶, 白艳, 许嘉欣, 梁福鑑, 冯小键. 脑电频谱特征分析在孤独症谱系障碍儿童早期诊断及康复干预评价中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 311-315.