喉罩全麻联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉用于老年髋部手术效果比较

doi:10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2018.11.011

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2018, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11): 1265-1269.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2018.11.011

喉罩全麻联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉用于老年髋部手术效果比较

鲁学文¹, 刘月江²

¹东南大学附属中大医院江北院区麻醉科，南京 210044，江苏；²东南大学附属中大医院麻醉科，南京 210009，江苏

收稿日期:2018-07-02 修回日期:2018-07-31 出版日期:2018-11-26 发布日期:2018-11-22
通讯作者: 刘月江，男，硕士，副教授，研究方向：临床麻醉学。 Tel:025-56873218 E-mail:yuejiangliu@126.com
作者简介:鲁学文，男，本科，研究方向：临床麻醉学。 E-mail:532769194@qq.com

Comparison of the effects of general laryngeal mask anesthesia combined with iliofascial block and lumbar epidural anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery

LU Xuewen¹, LIU Yuejiang²

¹Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (Jiangbei), Nanjing 310044, Jiangsu, China; ² Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China

Received:2018-07-02 Revised:2018-07-31 Online:2018-11-26 Published:2018-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 比较喉罩全麻联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞(GLB)与腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)用于老年髋部手术的效果。方法: 选择行择期髋部手术的老年患者100例，用随机数字表法将所有患者分为GLB组（n=50）与CSEA组（n=50）。比较两组患者麻醉前（T0）、麻醉后5 min（T1）、手术主要步骤进行时（T2）、术后8 h（T3）、术后12 h（T4）血氧饱和度、心率、血压变化；术后疼痛VAS评分，镇痛泵追加次数；术后24 h不良反应（恶心呕吐、头痛、尿潴留、发热、嗜睡、谵妄）发生情况以及患者满意度。结果: 各时间点两组患者血氧饱和度无明显差异（P>0.05）。两组患者的心率、血压在T0无统计学差异（P>0.05），但GLB组在T1-T4时期心率、血压波动幅度明显低于CSEA组（P<0.05）, 术后12 h时VAS评分及镇痛泵追加次数GLB组明显低于CSEA组（P<0.01）, GLB组术后24 h不良反应(恶心呕吐、头痛、尿潴留)发生率低于CSEA组（P<0.05），而患者麻醉及镇痛满意度都显著高于CSEA组（P<0.01）。结论: 喉罩全麻联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞相比腰硬联合麻醉可有效改善老年患者髋部手术术中血流动力学波动，降低术后不良反应发生率，优化术后疼痛管理，提高患者的满意度。

关键词: 喉罩全麻, 髂筋膜间隙阻滞, 腰硬联合麻醉, 老年髋部手术, 满意度

Abstract:

AIM: To compare the effects of general laryngeal maskanesthesia combined with iliofascial block（GLB）and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia（CSEA） in the operation of elderly patients with hip surgery. METHODS: A total of 100 elderly hip patients undergoing elective surgery admitted from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 in our hospital were randomly divided into GLB group and CSEA group, with 50 cases in each group. The changes of oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure were compared between the two groups before anesthesia (T0), 5 min after anesthesia (T1), during the main procedure (T2), 8 h after operation (T3), 12 h after operation (T4). VAS score after operation and the times of analgesia pump were used to observe the pain; postoperative 24 h adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, headache, urinary retention, fever, drowsiness, delirium) occurred and patient's satisfaction were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in oxygen saturation between the two groups during the whole process (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in heart rate and blood pressure between two groups at T0 (P>0.05), but compared with GLB group, the fluctuation amplitude of heart rate, blood pressure were significantly lower than CSEA group during T1-T4（P<0.05）, the postoperative VAS score and the times of analgesia pump used were significantly lower than CSEA group（P<0.01）, postoperative 24 h adverse reactions were also lower than CSEA group（P<0.05）, the patient's satisfaction in GLB group was higher than CSEA group（P<0.01）. CONCLUSION: Compared with lumbar epidural anesthesia, the general laryngeal mask anesthesia combined with iliofascial block can effectively improve the hemodynamics fluctuation, reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, optimize postoperative pain management and improve patients ' satisfaction in the operation of elderly patients undergoing hip surgery.

Key words: general laryngeal mask anesthesia, iliofascial block, lumbar epidural anesthesia, elderly hip surgery, patient's satisfaction

中图分类号:

鲁学文，刘月江. 喉罩全麻联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉用于老年髋部手术效果比较[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2018, 23(11): 1265-1269.

LU Xuewen, LIU Yuejiang. Comparison of the effects of general laryngeal mask anesthesia combined with iliofascial block and lumbar epidural anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(11): 1265-1269.

参考文献

［1］Flikweert ER, Wendt KW, Diercks RL, et al. Complications after hip fracture surgery: are they preventable［J］? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2018, 44(4):573-580.
［2］Jamal Sepah Y, Umer M, Khan A, et al. Functional out- come, mortality and in-hospital complications of operative treatment in elderly patients with hip fractures in the developing world［J］. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(3): 431-435.
［3］Smektala R, Endres HG, Dasch B. The effect of time to surgery on outcome in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures［J］. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2008, 9: 171.
［4］Bilsel K,Erdil M,Gulabi D,et al. Factors affecting mortality after hip fracture surgery: a retrospective analysis of 578 patients［J］. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013, 23(8): 895-900.
［5］Passot S, Servin F, Pascal J, et al. A comparison of target- and manually controlled infusion propofol and etomidate/desflurane anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery［J］. Anesth Analg, 2005, 100(5):1338-1342.
［6］张杰，解雅英，辛学东.不同麻醉方式对老年全髋关节置换术的影响［J］.医学综述，2018，24（2）:576-580.
［7］黄惠英，刘文领，陈振华，等.超声引导下肢神经阻滞在老年危重患者股骨头置换术中的效果观察［J］.广西医学，2014，36(5):669-671.
［8］高瑞华，郑胜兰，张林. 腰-硬联合麻醉剖宫产术中采用不同穿刺间隙效果比较［J］. 现代仪器与医疗，2017，23（6）：125-127.
［9］王保华. 腰硬联合麻醉在老年病人下腹部会阴部及下肢手术中的应用［J］. 长春中医药大学学报，2010，26（5）: 758-759.
［10］Zhang P,Li J,Song Y,et al.The efficiency and safety of fasciailiaca block for pain control after total joint arthroplasty:A meta analysis［J］.Medicine(Baltimore),2017,96(15) :e6592．
［11］Yu B,He M,Cai GY,et al.Ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerveblock vs continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for hipreplacement in the elderly:A randomized controlled clinicaltrial(CONSOＲT)［J］.Medicine,2016,95(42) :e5056．

[1]	吴玲玲, 饶燕珍, 王韧. 导乐仪及腰硬联合麻醉应用于分娩镇痛的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2015, 20(9): 1047-1051.
[2]	付霜, 周惠丹, 袁晓红, 曲丕盛. 围术期应用加巴喷丁对开胸术后慢性疼痛的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2015, 20(5): 583-586.
[3]	程李健, 郑丽花, 江秀清, 赵柯敏, 余洁, 余功敏, 兰允平, 邵雪泉. 不同剂量右美托咪啶预防腰硬联合麻醉下寒战反应的效果[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2015, 20(2): 203-207.
[4]	张永凤, 程明华, 徐岚, 周家芳. 腰硬联合麻醉用于分娩镇痛的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2003, 8(3): 320-322.

喉罩全麻联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉用于老年髋部手术效果比较

Comparison of the effects of general laryngeal mask anesthesia combined with iliofascial block and lumbar epidural anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价