1 Kemp HG. Left ventricular function in patients with the angina syndrome and normal coronary arteriograms. Am J Cardiol, 1973; 32:375 2 Opherk D, Zebe H, Weihe E, et al. Reduced coronary dilator capacity and ultrastmctural changes of the myocardium in patients with angina pectoris, but normal coronary arteriograms. Circulation, 1981;63: 817 3 Cannon RO, Watson RM, Rosing DR et al. The pathophysiological dilemma of syndrome X. Circulation, 1992; 85:1359 4 Cannon RO, Camic PG, Epstein SE, et al. Angina caused by reduced vasodilator reserve of the small coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardial, 1983; 883 5 Camic PG, Mamaccini P, Lorenzony R, et al. Coronary hemodynamic and myocardial metabolism in patients with syndrome X:Response to pacing stress. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991; 17: 1461 6 Mohri M, Koyanagi M, Egashira K, et al. Angina pectoris caused by coronary microvascular spasm. Lancet, 1998; 251: 1165 7 Cannon RO, Bobow RO, Bacharah SL, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction in patients with angina pectoris, normal epicardial coronary arteries and abnormal vasodilator reserve. Circulation, 1985;71: 218 8 Geltman EM, Henes CG, Semeff ML, et al. Increased my ocardial perfusion a t rest and diminished perfusion reserve in patients with angina and angiograms. J Am Coll Cardial, 1990; 16:586 9 Cannon RO, Leon MB, Watson RM, et al. Chest pain and normal coronary arteries: role of small coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol, 1985; 55: 50B 10 Caltnon RO, Schenke WH, Leon MBr, et al. Limited coronary flow reserve after dipyridamole in patients with erg onovine-induced coronary vasocontriction. Circulation, 1987; 75: 163 11 Camic PG, Oistri R, Lorezoni R, et al. Coronary reserve and exercise ECG in patients chest Pain and normal coronary angiograms. Circulation, 1992; 86:179 12 Villanueva FS, Kaul S.Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery-disease using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Coron Anery Dis, 1995: 6: 18 13 Kemner AJ, Oboyle IE, Sharma S, et al. Hydrogen peroxide contrast-enhanced two dimensional echocardiography: real time in vivo delineation of regional my ocardial perfusion. Circulation, 1983; 68:603 14 Ten FJ, Dury JK, Meerbaunl S, et al. My ocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography: experimental examination at different coronary flow level. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3: 1219 15 Maurer O, Ong K, Haendchen R, et al. My ocardial contrast two-dimenional: echocardiography: comparison of contrast disappearance rates m normal and underperfused mypoocardium. Japanese Circulation, 1984;69: 418 16 Icaul S, Pandian NG, Okada RD, et al. Contrast echocardiography in acute my ocardial ischemia. In vivo determination n of total left ventricular area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4: 1272 17 Villaaueva PS, Glasheen WD, Sklenar J, et al. Assessment of risk area during coronary occlusion and infarct size af ter reperfusion with my ocardial contrast echocardiography using left and right atria injection on contrast. Circulation, 1993; 88: 596 18 Ito H, Iwakura K, Oh H, et al. Tempo ralchanges in myocardial perfusion patterns in patients with reperfusion anterior wall myocardial infarction; Their relation to myocardial viability. Circulation, 1995; 91:656 19 Kaul S, Gillam LD, Weynlalt AE, et al. Contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985;6:825 20 Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior my ocardial infarction. Circulation, 1992;85: 1699 |