Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Chinese

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2004, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3): 354-357.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of testing approaches to establishing equivalence on proportions

LU Jing-Jing, YU Hao1, CHEN Feng1   

  1. CDC of Shandong province, J inan, 250014, Shandong, China;
    1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2003-11-03 Revised:2004-02-06 Online:2004-03-26 Published:2020-11-21

Abstract: Using Monte Carlo simulation to compare different test approaches, the results showed that Dunnett-Gent method was the best one of them both in type I error controlling and test power, and the statistical powers are very lower for all of 10 equivalence test methods when test group and reference group has only 100 cases.When establishing equivalence, 100 cases for each group suggested by State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA)is insufficiency, the required sample size should be estimated by statistical procedure.

Key words: test of equivalence on proportions, power, sample size

CLC Number: