中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 1276-1278.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-1638

• 经验交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

小儿髋关节发育不良诊断中超声检查的应用及其临床意义

邓雄峰1, 杨丽1, 王园芳1, 方向2   

  1. 1 宜昌市夷陵区妇幼保健院儿科,湖北 宜昌 443000;
    2 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院儿科,湖北 武汉 430000
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-03 修回日期:2020-02-10 发布日期:2020-11-10 出版日期:2020-11-10
  • 作者简介:邓雄峰(1967-),男,湖北人,副主任医师,本科学历,主要从事儿科临床工作。
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金(2008CDB139)

Application and clinical significance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia in children

DENG Xiong-feng1, YANG Li1, WANG Yuan-fang1, FANG Xiang2   

  1. 1 Department of Pediatrics,Yiling Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Yichang,Hubei 443000,China;
    2 Department of Pediatrics,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430000,China
  • Received:2019-12-03 Revised:2020-02-10 Online:2020-11-10 Published:2020-11-10

摘要: 目的 分析小儿髋关节发育不良诊断中超声检查的应用,为临床提供更多参考依据。方法 选取2018年1-12月宜昌市夷陵区妇幼保健院收治的筛查结果提示髋关节发育不良的儿童360例,均进一步行X线检查及超声检查;以所有儿童的最终临床诊断及随访6个月结果作为对比金标准。结果 360例婴儿经临床诊断及随访结果显示共有29例(8.1%)为髋关节发育不良。X线检查结果的诊断准确率为98.6%(355/360),超声检查结果的诊断准确率为99.4%(358/360)(P>0.05)。X线检查组的诊断敏感度为93.1%,特异度为99.1%;超声查组的诊断敏感度为96.5%,特异度为99.7%,超声检查的诊断敏感度和特异度略微高于X线检查组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。360例婴儿中,髋关节Ⅰ型(正常)婴儿为331例(91.9%);Ⅱ型(髋关节生理性发育未成熟)婴儿22例(75.9%),对X线检查组婴儿进行随访追踪,有15例在临床复查时为I型(正常髋关节),2例未发生变化,其余5例失访。结论 使用X线及超声检查均能准确诊断小儿髋关节发育不良;超声检查相比X线检查能够有效降低或者避免婴儿在接受检查过程中过多接受X线辐射,临床推广价值更高。

关键词: 髋关节发育不良, 超声检查, X光线检查, 儿童

Abstract: Objective To analyze the application of ultrasonic examination in the diagnosis of dysplasia of hip joint in children,so as to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods A total of 360 children with screening result of hip joint dysplasia were selected in Yiling Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January to December 2018,and took further X-ray examination and ultrasonic examination.The final clinical diagnosis and follow-up for 6 months in all children were used as the gold standard for comparison. Results Finally 29 (8.1%) of 360 infants were diagnosed with hip dysplasia.The diagnostic accuracy ratios of X-ray examination and ultrasonic examination were 98.6% (355/360) and 99.4% (358/360).The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the X-ray group were 99.7% and 99.1%,respectively.The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic examination group were 96.5% and 91.9%,respectively.The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic examination were slightly higher than that of X-ray examination,but there were no significant differences (P>0.05).Among 360 infants,331 (91.9%) were of type I (normal hip joint),and 22(75.9%) infants were detected with type Ⅱ (immature) hip physiological development,of whom 15 infants changed to type I (normal hip),2 infants had no change,and 5 infants lost during the follow-up. Conclusions X-ray and ultrasonic examination can diagnose hip dysplasia accurately.Compared with X-ray examination,ultrasonic examination can effectively reduce or avoid excessive exposure to X-ray radiation in the process of examination,which is of higher clinical promotion value.

Key words: hip dysplasia, ultrasonic examination, X-ray examination, children

中图分类号: