辅助生殖技术受孕与自然受孕双胎早产儿临床特征比较分析

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-1862

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 834-837.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-1862

辅助生殖技术受孕与自然受孕双胎早产儿临床特征比较分析

刘亚璇, 段稳丽, 王银娟, 张一, 张茹, 金心韫, 徐发林

郑州大学第三附属医院新生儿科,河南郑州 450052

收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2020-12-24 发布日期:2021-08-24 出版日期:2021-08-10
通讯作者: 徐发林,E-mail:xufalin72@126.com
作者简介:刘亚璇(1994-),女,河南人,硕士学位,主要研究方向为新生儿疾病。
基金资助:
“关爱”早产儿疾病科研基金(K034);2017年河南省科技攻关项目(172102310497)

Comparison of clinical characteristics of twin premature infants between assisted reproductive technology conception and natural conception

LIU Ya-xuan, DUAN Wen-li, WANG Yin-juan, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Ru, JIN Xin-yun, XU Fa-lin

Department of Neonatology,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450052,China

Received:2020-10-26 Revised:2020-12-24 Online:2021-08-10 Published:2021-08-24
Contact: XU Fa-lin, E-mail: xufalin72@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析辅助生殖技术(ART)受孕与自然受孕双胎早产儿临床特征的差异,为母婴围生期保健和临床工作提供参考价值。方法选取2019年1月1日—12月31日河南省17地市53家医院产科分娩的2 900例双胎早产儿为研究对象,按受孕方式不同分为ART受孕组(n=604)及自然受孕组(n=2 296),收集其一般情况、住院期间并发症、治疗和结局情况及其母亲妊娠期情况等临床资料,并进行比较分析。结果 ART组早产儿母亲平均年龄、高龄比例、产前糖皮质激素使用率及剖宫产率高于自然受孕组(t=7.254,χ²=10.319、7.735、4.855,P＜0.05),妊娠期高血压及妊娠期糖尿病发生率明显高于自然受孕组(χ²=23.664、54.040,P＜0.01);ART组早产儿平均胎龄低于自然受孕组,胎龄＜34周比例及窒息率高于自然受孕组(t=-2.298,χ²=8.780、6.315,P＜0.05),两组早产儿主要并发症、治疗及结局情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 ART受孕双胎早产儿母亲平均年龄、高龄产妇比例及妊娠期高血压、妊娠期糖尿病发生率较自然受孕者高;ART未增加双胎早产儿近期不良结局的风险,但其出生胎龄较小,窒息率较高,因此围生期保健及管理时需给予高度关注。

关键词: 早产, 辅助生殖技术, 双胎, 临床结局

Abstract: Objective To analyze the differences in clinical characteristics of twin premature infants between assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception and natural conception,in order to provide reference for perinatal healthcare. Methods A total of 2 900 twin premature infants delivered in 53 hospitals in 17 cities of Henan Province from January 1st,2019 to December 31st,2019 were selected as participants,and were divided into ART conception group (n=604) and natural conception group (n=2 296). The infants' general characteristics,complications,treatment and outcomes,as well as their mothers' perinatal conditions were compared and analyzed. Results The average age,the proportion of advanced age,the utilization rate of antenatal corticosteroid and cesarean section rate of the ART group were higher than those in the natural conception group (t=7.254,χ²=10.319,7.735,4.855,P<0.05). And the incidence rates of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes in the ART group were significantly higher than those in the natural conception group (χ²=23.664,54.040,P＜0.01). The average gestational age of preterm infants in the ART group was lower than that in the natural conception group,and the ratio of gestational age less than 34 weeks and the asphyxia rate were higher than those in the natural conception group (t=-2.298,χ²=8.780,6.315,P＜0.05). But there were no significant differences in the main complications,treatment and outcomes between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The maternal age,the proportion of advanced age,the incidence of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes of the ART are higher than those of natural pregnancy. But ART does not increase the risk of short-term adverse outcomes for twin preterm infants. In view of the small gestational age and high suffocation rate of the twin preterm infants,the infants should be paid close attention during perinatal care and management.

Key words: preterm birth, assisted reproductive technology, twin pregnancy, clinical outcomes

中图分类号:

刘亚璇, 段稳丽, 王银娟, 张一, 张茹, 金心韫, 徐发林. 辅助生殖技术受孕与自然受孕双胎早产儿临床特征比较分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(8): 834-837.

LIU Ya-xuan, DUAN Wen-li, WANG Yin-juan, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Ru, JIN Xin-yun, XU Fa-lin. Comparison of clinical characteristics of twin premature infants between assisted reproductive technology conception and natural conception[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2021, 29(8): 834-837.

参考文献

[1] 刘艳.辅助生殖技术早产儿预后影响因素的研究进展[J].国际儿科学杂志,2019,46(3):187-189.
[2] Sunderam S,Kissin DM,Zhang Y,et al.Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States,2016[J].MMWR Surveill Summ,2019,68(4):1-23.
[3] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M]. 5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:57-236.
[4] Yang X,Li Y,Li C,et al.Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China[J].Fertil Steril,2014,101(2):385-391.
[5] 任帅,刘敬超,王慧,等.自然受孕与辅助生殖技术受孕双胎妊娠的临床特征及母儿结局比较[J].解放军医学院学报,2020,41(4):337-340.
[6] Li HT,Luo S,Trasande L,et al.Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China,2008-2014[J].JAMA,2017,317(1):69-76.
[7] 侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,等.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(10):728-735.
[8] 邓瑛,王洁,刘大艳,等.辅助生育技术助孕双胎妊娠并发症及结局的临床分析[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2014,43(4):459-462.
[9] 张雪,刘凯波,刘凤杰,等.北京市不同年龄段孕妇妊娠期临床特点及妊娠结局的分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2018,53(7):452-458.
[10] 张惠琴,樊蕊,田国华,等.试管婴儿双胎及自然受孕双胎临床分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2015,17(1):63-67.
[11] Lei LL,Lan YL,Wang SY,et al.Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2019,132(20):2408-2416.
[12] 杨悦.试管婴儿双胎妊娠与自然受孕双胎妊娠临床结果对比分析[J].泰山医学院学报,2017,38(12):1417-1418.
[13] 武静静,张月莲.自然受孕、试管婴儿及促排卵受孕双胎妊娠临床结局研究[J].山西医科大学学报,2019,50(4):493-496.
[14] Wang AY,Safi N,Ali F,et al.Neonatal outcomes among twins following assisted reproductive technology: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2018,18(1):320.
[15] 许小艳,杨景晖,麻新梅,等.试管婴儿新生儿期并发症及出生缺陷分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2015,17(4):350-355.
[16] Dickey RP,Xiong X,Xie Y,et al.Effect of maternal height and weight on risk for preterm singleton and twin births resulting from IVF in the United States,2008-2010[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2013,209(4):349.
[17] Bordi G,D'Ambrosio A,Gallotta I,et al.The influence of ovulation induction and assisted conception on maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2017,21(18):3998-4006.
[18] 张丽,董彦会,马军.试管双胎婴儿与自然妊娠双胎婴儿临床特征比较分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(11):1125-1127.

辅助生殖技术受孕与自然受孕双胎早产儿临床特征比较分析

Comparison of clinical characteristics of twin premature infants between assisted reproductive technology conception and natural conception

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张丹, 张军, 杨钰荣, 曹咪, 闫敬敏, 朱璐阳. 肠道菌群与早产儿脑发育及神经认知行为关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 756-759.
[2]	潘婷, 张萱. 双胎小于胎龄儿生长发育及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 760-765.
[3]	冯骁, 陈凌, 赵红缨, 黄蕊, 林辰曦, 庄丽娟. 不同脐带挤压方式对极早产儿结局的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(7): 794-798.
[4]	郑亭玉, 张春宇, 杨飞, 郑芳, 张梦霞, 夏露萍, 徐孙超. 营养支持小组管理模式对早产儿生长发育及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 555-558.
[5]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[6]	李静兰, 孙文强, 朱雪萍. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良相关预测模型研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 395-398.
[7]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[8]	任力, 黑明燕, 齐宇洁, 靳绯, 翁景文, 董世霄, 沈艳华, 姜敏. 早产儿喂养对坏死性小肠结肠炎发病的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 438-441.
[9]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[10]	王晶, 项思嘉, 鲁莹, 杨蕾, 胡小沙, 钱君, 池霞, 张敏. 早产儿3周岁体格生长及体成分分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 457-460.
[11]	郑水英, 罗艳赟. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床表现及相关影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 461-464.
[12]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[13]	何小颖, 吴翠玲, 曾玲艳, 綦美姣, 孙亚莲. 早产儿食物转换对血清营养素水平的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 81-85.
[14]	王慧冉, 罗荣, 胡文玲. 2019年3所妇幼保健院早产儿视网膜病变筛查及随访分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 105-108.
[15]	孙兴, 胡晓山, 刘凤, 刘蓓蓓. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 109-112.