晚期早产儿早期干预闪光视觉诱发电位及贝莉婴儿发育量表-Ⅱ方法评估及效果研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-02-05

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 127-130.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-02-05

晚期早产儿早期干预闪光视觉诱发电位及贝莉婴儿发育量表-Ⅱ方法评估及效果研究

王婷雪¹,李蓓²,杨慧琳¹,张锦明¹,徐秀²

1 上海浦东新区妇幼保健院,上海 201206;
2 复旦大学附属儿科医院,上海 201102

收稿日期:2015-08-05 发布日期:2016-02-01 出版日期:2016-02-01
通讯作者: 徐秀,E-mail:xuxiu@shmu.edu.com
作者简介:王婷雪(1975-),女,吉林人,主治医师,硕士学位,主要研究方向为儿童保健。
基金资助:
上海浦东新区科委创新基金项目(PKJ2012-Y33)

Study on the evaluation and effect of early intervention flashvisual evoked potential and Bayley Scales of Infant Development Ⅱ on late premature infants

WANG Ting-xue¹,LI Bei²,YANG Hui-lin¹,ZHANG Jin-ming¹,XU Xiu²

1 Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area,Shanghai 201206,China;
2 Children's Hospital of Fudan University,Shanghai 201102,China

Received:2015-08-05 Online:2016-02-01 Published:2016-02-01
Contact: XU Xiu,E-mail:xuxiu@shmu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的应用闪光视觉诱发电位(FVEP)、贝莉婴儿发育量表-Ⅱ(BSID-Ⅱ)方法评估早期干预对晚期早产儿(LPIs)早期神经心理和视觉发育的影响,为有效开展系统的早产儿早期干预及评估方案提供临床依据。方法对LPIs干预组(A组)、LPIs对照组(B组)、足月儿(FTIs)对照组(C组)进行定期随访,并对A组实施早期干预;于矫正月龄3+0.7、6±0.7、12±0.7时对三组随访婴儿进行FVEP、BSID-Ⅱ评估。结果 1)FVEP 评估①A组3、6、12月龄P1均值为165.59、131.91、102.20。②A组随月龄增大P1均值逐渐接近C组,12月龄C、A两组P1均值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),说明LPIs经干预后脑视觉神经发育速度加快。2)BSID-Ⅱ评估①A组对3、6、12月龄PDI均值为89.6、94.5、102.8;MDI均值为88.9、95.3、101.4;C组PDI 均值为103.2、103.7、108.2;MDI均值为100.7、104.3、106.1。三组间各月龄C组PDI、MDI均值最大。②A组PDI、MDI均值随月龄增大逐渐接近C组,但12月龄C、A两组PDI、MDI均值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),说明LPIs经干预后脑精神运动发育速度加快,但仍落后于足月儿。结论 LPIs的视觉、认知及运动发育水平虽正常但落后FTIs,早期干预可以有效提高其该发育水平。婴儿1岁以内视觉发育呈非匀速水平,对LPIs早期干预,矫正6月龄后见追赶式发育。LPIs干预后6月龄综合发育水平优于单纯的视觉发育水平。建议两种评估方法结合使用,起到优势互补作用。

关键词: 晚期早产儿, 足月儿, 早期干预

Abstract: Objective To assess the impact of early intervention on late preterm infants' (LPIs) early neuropsychological and visual system development,to provide clinical evidence for early intervention programs in preterm children. Methods LPIs in the intervention group(GA),LPIs in the not intervention group(GB),full-term infants (FTIs) in the control group (GC)were regular followed-up,GA were implemented of early intervention; Three groups of infants whose corrected 3 + 0.7,6±0.7,12±0.7 months of age,were assessed flashvisual evoked potential ( FVEP),Bayley Scales of Infant Development Ⅱ (BSID-Ⅱ). Results 1)FVEP assessment in the three groups showed that the mean P1 latency of GA were 165.59,131.91,102.20 at corrected ages of 3,6 and 12 months respectively;P1 mean of GA increased with age increaseing.Between GC and GA,P1 mean showed no significant difference (P>0.05) at 12 months age,description after the intervention of LPIs its visual neurodevelopment speed.2)BSID-Ⅱ assessment in the three groups showed that the mean PDI scores of GA were 89.6,94.5,102.8; the mean MDI scores of LPIs were 88.9,95.3,101.4 at corrected ages of 3,6 and 12 months respectively;the mean PDI scores of GC were 103.2,103.7,108.2; the mean MDI scores of FTIs were 100.7,104.3,106.1 at 3,6 and 12 months respectively.PDI,MDI mean of GC were maximum among three groups.MDI,PDI means of GA increased with age,P1 mean showed no significant difference (P<0.05) between GC and GA,indicating that LPIs brain psychomotor development speed after the intervention,but lower than FTIs. Conclusions Although visual development,cognitive and motor development levels of LPIs were normal,but lower than FTIs,early interventions to those can improve the cognitive and sports development.Visual development of infants younger than 1 year old is in a non-uniform level to see the development of catch-up after 6 months of age corrected.After 6 months of intervention LPIs comprehensive developmental level is higher than purely visual level of development.Proposal evaluation methods will be used in combination and can play a complementary role.

Key words: late-preterm infants, full-term infants, early intervention

中图分类号:

R179

王婷雪,李蓓,杨慧琳,张锦明,徐秀. 晚期早产儿早期干预闪光视觉诱发电位及贝莉婴儿发育量表-Ⅱ方法评估及效果研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(2): 127-130.

WANG Ting-xue,LI Bei,YANG Hui-lin,ZHANG Jin-ming,XU Xiu. Study on the evaluation and effect of early intervention flashvisual evoked potential and Bayley Scales of Infant Development Ⅱ on late premature infants[J]. journal1, 2016, 24(2): 127-130.

参考文献

[1] Spittle A,Orton J,Anderson P.Early developmental intervention programmes post-hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2012,12:CD005495.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub3.
[2] Subramanian SK,Gaur GS,Narayan SK.Low luminance eyes closed and monochromatic stimulations reduce variability of flash visual evoked potential latency[J].Ann Indian Acad Neurol,2013,16(4):614-618.
[3] Lee J,Birtles D,Wattam-Bell J.Orientation-reversal VEP:Comparison of phase and peak latencies in adults and infants[J].Vision Research,2012,63:50-57.
[4] Feng JJ,Wang WP,Xu X.Flash visual evoked potentials in preterm infants[J].Ophthalmology,2013,120(3):489-494.
[5] de Almeida Soares D,Cunha AB,Tudella E.Differences between late preterm and full-term infants:Comparing effects of a short bout of practice on early reaching behavior[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities,2014,35(11):3096-3107.
[6] Arpino C,Compagnone E,Montanaro ML.Preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcome:a review[J].Childs Nerv Syst,2010,26(9):1139-1149.
[7] Romeo DM,Di Stefano A,Conversano M.Neurodevelopmental outcome at 12 and 18 months in late preterm infants[J].Eur J Paediatr Neurol,2010,14:503-507.
[8] Liu XM,Chu Q.A study on the neurological developmental outcome and associated impact factors of late preterm[J].Chinese Journal of Neonatology,2012,27(4):233-236.
[9] Kugelman A,Colin AA.Late preterm infants:near term but still in a critical developmental time period[J].Pediatrics,2013,132:741-751.
[10] Woythaler MA,McCormick MC,Smith VC.Late preterm infants have worse 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants[J].Pediatrics.2011,127(3):e622-629.doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3598.
[11] Peykarjou S,Hoehl S,Rossion B,Pauen S.The development of visual object categorization as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation[J].J Vis,2015,15(12):1163.
[12] Papageorgiou KA,Smith TJ,Wu R.Individual differences in infant fixation duration relate to attention and behavioral control in childhood[J].Psychol Sci,2014,25(7):1371-9.doi:10.1177/0956797614531295.
[13] 郭书娟,徐秀,夏经炜,等.早期干预对早产儿早期认知发展的影响研究,2010,18(4):295-297.

[1]	王晓庆, 刘九月, 姚光. 小于胎龄儿早期脑发育及18~24月龄时神经发育状况的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 353-358.
[2]	林欢喜, 刘潘婷, 童梅玲, 池霞, 钱君, 洪琴. 父母介导的干预在孤独症谱系障碍治疗中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 304-310.
[3]	陈玉霞, 刘华艳, 范倩倩. 足月儿高胆红素血症神经元特异性烯醇化酶、经皮小时胆红素、总胆红素/白蛋白水平变化及与远期神经发育的相关性[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 86-90.
[4]	周峰, 蒋黎艳, 高萍萍. Peabody运动发育量表结合配套运动训练方案在运动发育迟缓儿童中早期干预效果[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(6): 603-606.
[5]	赵明月, 项栋良, 张春艳, 乌云塔娜, 杨海凤, 李爽, 王琰, 王艳. 高危儿早期干预的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 531-534.
[6]	李欣, 王战胜, 陈燕梅, 张寅, 杜锟. Alberta婴儿运动量表在评估早期综合性干预对早产儿预后影响的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 562-565.
[7]	中国优生优育协会婴幼儿发育专业委员会. 高危新生儿行为神经发育早期干预专家共识[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(3): 233-236.
[8]	胡丹, 汪晓霞, 崔一帆, 刘璞, 梁倩, 肖绪武. 辅助生殖技术试管足月儿神经心理行为发育的纵向研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(2): 140-143.
[9]	牟雨虹, 李婧, 胡幼芳. 早产儿早期神经运动干预研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(2): 181-183.
[10]	郝朝丽, 吴茜茜, 韩清梅, 曾佩, 郭津. 目标-活动-运动强化疗法对脑瘫高危儿早期干预的应用进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1104-1107.
[11]	唐孟言, 刘孝美, 杜娟. 早产儿与足月儿早期神经运动发育的差异性分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1149-1152.
[12]	孙宾宾, 王馨苑, 韦臻, 冯哲, 张诗, 万国斌. 基于眼动技术的高危孤独症谱系障碍幼儿限制性兴趣研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(9): 932-936.
[13]	王华倩, 姚宝珍. 早产儿神经发育特点及临床诊疗进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(8): 877-880.
[14]	孙莉, 杨靖华, 陈英, 吴琼琼, 曹岳蓉. 襁褓浴和浴缸浴对中晚期早产儿沐浴时生理参数及压力影响的比较[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(5): 497-501.
[15]	周宇航, 赵宏博, 郭岚敏, 姜志梅. 儿童及青少年孤独症谱系障碍漏误诊研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(4): 409-413.

晚期早产儿早期干预闪光视觉诱发电位及贝莉婴儿发育量表-Ⅱ方法评估及效果研究

Study on the evaluation and effect of early intervention flashvisual evoked potential and Bayley Scales of Infant Development Ⅱ on late premature infants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics