欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2013, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (8): 891-896.

• 定量药理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

药代动力学非房室模型终末段半衰期的算法研究

陈潮, 许羚, 郑青山   

  1. 上海中医药大学药物临床研究中心,上海 201203
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-19 修回日期:2013-06-26 出版日期:2013-08-26 发布日期:2013-07-31
  • 通讯作者: 许羚,女,硕士研究生,助理研究员,研究方向:定量药理学。Tel: 021-51322556 E-mail: ling.xu@drugchina.net
  • 作者简介:陈潮,女,硕士研究生,研究方向:临床药理学和定量药理学。Tel: 021-51322556 E-mail: cclinglingmiao@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划(2008BAI51B03);科技部创新药物研究开发技术平台建设(2012ZX09303-003,2012ZX09303009-001)和上海市教委项目 (J50303,2012JW24)

Study of the algorithm of elimination half-life time in pharmacokinetics

CHEN Chao, XU Ling, ZHENG Qing-shan   

  1. Center for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2013-03-19 Revised:2013-06-26 Online:2013-08-26 Published:2013-07-31

摘要: 目的: 评价非房室模型终末段半衰期(t1/2z) 不同计算方法的准确度和精密度,为t1/2z算法优选提供依据。方法: 在不同个体间变异(CV,CV=15%,25%,35%)下,用静注二室房室模型参数进行数据模拟,分别获得1000个受试者完整时间与浓度(C-T)曲线数据,再按样本量(N,N=15,25,35,45)用Bootstrap方法抽样1000次,最后获得12个数据集,用4种方法(5点法,4点法, 6点法,全点法)计算每个数据集消除相不同点时的t1/2z,其结果的均值与真值(静注二室模型的消除半衰期)比较作为准确度,其标准差大小作为稳定性。结果: 当C-T曲线消除相有4个点时,5点法计算值最准确且较为稳定,而6点法最为稳定;当消除相3点时,4点法计算值准确度最高且较为稳定,而6点法最为稳定;消除相2点时,4种方法准确度稳定性皆低。结论: 消除相有效浓度点应至少3点,5点法和4点法计算t1/2z较为合理。

关键词: 终末段半衰期, 非房室模型参数, 药代动力学

Abstract: AIM: To study a reasonable algorithm of terminal half-life time (t1/2z) in pharmacokinetics by the accuracy and precision.METHODS: The plasma concentration-time data of pu- erarin was simulated for 1000 subjects by using parameters of intravenous two-compartment models in the variations of 15%, 25% and 35%. Resampling 15, 25, 35, and 45 from the 1000 subjects were used to calculate t1/2z by 4-point, 5-point, 6-point, all-point methods when there were different points in eliminate phase. The results of these methods were compared to the true value and expressed by accuracy and precision.RESULTS: The 5-point method can provide a t1/2z with better accuracy and precision when there are four concentration points in eliminate phase, the 4-point method provide the one with better accuracy in three points in eliminate phase, 6-point method provide t1/2z with better precision in both three and four points in eliminate phase. There is no reasonable t1/2z in all four methods if there are two points in eliminate phase.CONCLUSION: Three concentration points should be at least included in eliminating phase for calculating a t1/2z which is usually more reasonable in 4-points or 5-points method.

Key words: Terminal half-life time, Noncompartmental parameter, Pharmacokinetics

中图分类号: