欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 1168-1173.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2024.10.010

• 药物治疗学 • 上一篇    下一篇

瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查后对精神运动功能恢复的影响

胡双燕,胡君凤,毛琳玲,赵雨虹,徐程,邱凯,仲俊峰   

  1. 绍兴市人民医院麻醉科,绍兴市人民医院疼痛科,绍兴  312000,浙江
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-08 修回日期:2024-04-22 出版日期:2024-10-26 发布日期:2024-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 仲俊峰,男,硕士,主任医师,研究方向:舒适化诊疗及慢性疼痛管理。 E-mail: zhongjunfeng800@126.com
  • 作者简介:胡双燕,女,副主任医师,研究方向:舒适化诊疗及并发症。 E-mail: hushuangyan120@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    绍兴市卫生健康科技计划项目(2023SKY037)

Comparison of remazolam and propofol on the recovery of psychomotor function after painless gastrointestinal endoscopy

HU Shuangyan, HU Junfeng, MAO Linling, ZHAO Yuhong, XU Cheng, QIU Kai, ZHONG Junfeng   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology of Shaoxing Peopole's Hospital, Department of Pain Medicine of Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2024-01-08 Revised:2024-04-22 Online:2024-10-26 Published:2024-09-29

摘要:

目的:比较瑞马唑仑或丙泊酚复合阿芬太尼静脉麻醉无痛胃肠镜检查患者术后精神运动功能恢复的情况。方法:选择无痛胃肠镜检查患者78例,随机分为瑞马唑仑组(RA组)和丙泊酚组(PA组),两组分别给予瑞马唑仑或丙泊酚复合阿芬太尼静脉麻醉,记录术前(T1)、开始检查时(T2)、苏醒时(T3)和离室时(T4)的血压、心率、呼吸和指脉氧饱和度;应用Trieger点测试(trieger dot test,TDT)和数字符号替换测试(digit symbol substitution test,DSST)评估术前(T1)、离室时(T4)和术后1 h(T5)、术后2 h(T6)时精神运动功能情况。结果:与T1相比,两组T4、T5时TDT试验中遗漏点数(number of dots missed,NDM)、遗漏点最远距离(maximum distance of dots missed,MDDM)和遗漏点平均距离(average distance of dots missed,ADDM)均增加,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与T1相比,两组 T4、T5时DSST的完成率和正确率均降低,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者T6时TDT和DSST结果与T1比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与PA组相比,RA组 T4、T5时NDM、MDDM和ADDM均降低,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);RA组T4、T5时DSST完成率和正确率均增加,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与PA组相比,RA组T2时低血压发生率降低,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组呼吸抑制发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼用于无痛胃肠镜检查,术后2 h精神运动功能完全恢复;瑞马唑仑组患者精神运动功能恢复快于较丙泊酚组,且不良反应少。

关键词: 瑞马唑仑, 阿芬太尼, 二异丙酚, 胃肠镜, 精神运动功能

Abstract:

AIM: To compare the recovery of psychomotor function after intravenous anesthesia with remazolam or propofol compound alfentanil in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: 78 patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly divided into group RA and group  PA. Remiazolam or propofol combined with alfentanil were given intravenously in group RA or group PA. The blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and saturation of puls oxygen were recorded before procdure (T1), during checking (T2), awaking from anaesthesia (T3) and at discharging from PACU (T4). Psychomotor function, as measured by the Trieger's dot test (TDT) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), were evaluated before anesthesia (T1), at discharging from PACU (T4), 1 h (T5) and 2 h (T6) after checking. RESULTS: From assessment of the TDT, number of dots missed (NDM), maximum distance of dots missed (MDDM) and average distance of dots missed (ADDM) at T4, T5 were significantly lower than those at T1 in two groups. The completion rates and accuracy rates of DSST at T4, T5 were significantly lower than those at T1. Results of TDT and DSST at T6 were not significantly different to those at T1. The results of NDT, MDDM and ADDM at T4, T5 in group RA were significantly lower than those in group PA. The completion rates and accuracy rates of DSST at T4, T5 in group RA increased significantly compared with group PA. Compared to group PA, the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in group RA. There was no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory depression between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Psychomotor function was fully recovered 2 h after surgery when remazolam compound alfentanil was used for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Compared with propofol, psychomotor function recovery in the remazolam group was faster and there were fewer adverse effects after surgery in group RA.

Key words: remiazolam, alfentanil, propofol, gastrointestinal endoscopy, psychomotor function

中图分类号: