Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 154-163.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2024.02.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficacy and safety analysis of tigecycline and polymyxin B in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae pneumonia in critically ill patients

ZHA Xian1, CHEN Dayu2, SHAO Hua1   

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2023-07-31 Revised:2023-11-27 Online:2024-02-26 Published:2024-02-02

Abstract:

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of tigecycline with polymyxin B in the treatment of carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pneumonia in critically ill patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients with CRE pneumonia who received tigecycline or polymyxin B therapy from January 1,2018 to Jun 30,2023 in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Primary outcomes included the 28-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure rate within 28days. Secondary outcomes included the ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, the length of hospital stay and ICU stay, microbial eradication, duration of mechanical ventilation. Independent predictors affecting 28-day clinical cure rate were tested using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 83 eligible patients were included in the final analysis after propensity score matching, 54 in the tigecycline group and 29 in the polymyxin B group. The 28-day all-cause mortality was 31.5% (17/54) in the tigecycline group and 37.9% (11/29) in the polymyxin B group, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.554); the clinical cure rate was 63% (34/54) in the tigecycline group, which was significantly higher than that of the polymyxin B group of 34.5% (10/29) (P = 0.013). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of secondary outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that the use of tigecycline was an independent predictor of the 28-day clinical cure rate (HR 2.083, 95%CI 1.018-4.263, P = 0.045). However, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) were significantly prolonged in the tigecycline group compared with the polymyxin B group (P=0.047; P=0.027), and fibrinogen (FIB) was significantly decreased (P < 0.001) after drug administration. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in 28-day all-cause mortality between the tigecycline and polymyxin groups; tigecycline might be associated with a higher 28-day clinical cure rate compared with polymyxin B. It should be noted that tigecycline may increase the risk of coagulation abnormalities.

Key words: tigecycline, polymyxin B, pneumonia, carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae

CLC Number: