Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Chinese

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2011, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (12): 1406-1409.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three treatment schemes for Insulin Aspart 30 Injection on type 2 diabetes mellitus

ZHU Lei, ZHANG Li-fang, XU Lan, WANG Juan, ZHANG Guo-dong, SHEN Ming-feng   

  1. The First People's Hospital of Wujiang, Wujiang 215200, Jiangsu ,China
  • Received:2011-08-10 Revised:2011-11-07 Online:2011-12-26 Published:2012-01-07

Abstract: AIM: To compare the clinical therapeutic effects and cost-effectiveness of Insulin Aspart 30 Injection(NovoMix30FlexPen) among different therapeutic regimens for diabetic patients.METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in which a total of 135 cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus were divided into 3 groups by random(A: NovoMix30FlexPen for morning or night for 6 months; B: NovoMix30FlexPen prior three meals for 6 months; C: NovoMix30FlexPen for morning or night + Acarbose Tablets for 6 months).RESULTS: The effective rates of FBG were 84.4% in Group A versus 86.7% in Group B and 91.1% in Group C (P>0.05), the effective rates of PBG2h were 91.1%, 91.1% and 88.9%, and the effective rates of HbA1c were 75.6%, 80.0%, 77.8% respectively.CONCLUSION: Blood sugar level can be controlled to an ideal level through the three treatment schemes; while Group C is better considering the cost-effectiveness ratios, and it has the clinical value of popularization.

Key words: Insulin Aspart 30 Injection, Therapeutic regimen, Type 2 diabetes, Cost-effectiveness analysis

CLC Number: