Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1221-1230.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2026.09.008
Yumeng JIANG1(
), Jianzhong LI1, Yongfu HANG2, Youjing YANG3, Shasha TAO3, Kun HU1, Deyu XU1, Guoyuan LU1,*(
)
Received:2025-07-04
Revised:2025-12-15
Online:2026-09-26
Published:2026-10-08
Contact:
Guoyuan LU
E-mail:18151820813@163.com;sdfyylgy@163.com
CLC Number:
Yumeng JIANG, Jianzhong LI, Yongfu HANG, Youjing YANG, Shasha TAO, Kun HU, Deyu XU, Guoyuan LU. Influencing factors of the first serum concentration of vancomycin in patients with peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(9): 1221-1230.
| Baseline characteristics | Dosing interval 48 h group | Dosing interval 72 h group | P |
| Dialysis duration (month) | 38(19,47) | 34(20,98) | 0.673 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 946.45(783.80, | 0.126 | |
| CysC (mg/L) | 7.12(5.73,8.16) | 7.07(5.57,8.17) | 0.933 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 24.00(14.85,26.30) | 22.40(16.90,29.20) | 0.768 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 351.00(274.80,464.00) | 327.60(279.28,401.13) | 0.399 |
| Urine volume (mL/24 h) | 0(0,865) | 0(0,125) | 0.418 |
| Kt/V | 1.56(1.44,1.73) | 1.68(1.37,1.88) | 0.593 |
| D/P | 0.68(0.62,0.75) | 0.69(0.61,0.75) | 0.994 |
| Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | 1.056(0.423,5.366) | 1.562(0.396,4.712) | 0.978 |
| Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | 86.0(79.4,90.3) | 83.7(74.4,90.1) | 0.663 |
| Peripheral blood WBC count (109/L) | 7.20(4.57,9.22) | 6.84(5.08,8.72) | 0.966 |
| Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage (%) | 75.4(68.4,83.8) | 78.2(67.0,83.5) | 0.536 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 12.93(10.06,50.34) | 27.38(14.25,49.55) | 0.126 |
| History of peritonitis infection (%) | 0.699 | ||
| No | 7(50.00) | 13(56.52) | |
| Yes | 7(50.00) | 10(43.48) |
Table 1 Comparison of renal function, peritoneal transport characteristics, and inflammatory status between the 48 h and 72 h dosing interval groups
| Baseline characteristics | Dosing interval 48 h group | Dosing interval 72 h group | P |
| Dialysis duration (month) | 38(19,47) | 34(20,98) | 0.673 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 946.45(783.80, | 0.126 | |
| CysC (mg/L) | 7.12(5.73,8.16) | 7.07(5.57,8.17) | 0.933 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 24.00(14.85,26.30) | 22.40(16.90,29.20) | 0.768 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 351.00(274.80,464.00) | 327.60(279.28,401.13) | 0.399 |
| Urine volume (mL/24 h) | 0(0,865) | 0(0,125) | 0.418 |
| Kt/V | 1.56(1.44,1.73) | 1.68(1.37,1.88) | 0.593 |
| D/P | 0.68(0.62,0.75) | 0.69(0.61,0.75) | 0.994 |
| Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | 1.056(0.423,5.366) | 1.562(0.396,4.712) | 0.978 |
| Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | 86.0(79.4,90.3) | 83.7(74.4,90.1) | 0.663 |
| Peripheral blood WBC count (109/L) | 7.20(4.57,9.22) | 6.84(5.08,8.72) | 0.966 |
| Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage (%) | 75.4(68.4,83.8) | 78.2(67.0,83.5) | 0.536 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 12.93(10.06,50.34) | 27.38(14.25,49.55) | 0.126 |
| History of peritonitis infection (%) | 0.699 | ||
| No | 7(50.00) | 13(56.52) | |
| Yes | 7(50.00) | 10(43.48) |
| Variable | Low-serum concentration group | High-serum concentration group | P |
| Sex (%) | 0.742 | ||
| Male | 12(57.14) | 10(62.50) | |
| Female | 9(42.86) | 6(37.50) | |
| Age (years) | 46(37,63) | 48(37,65) | 0.978 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.80(1.70,1.96) | 1.84(1.56,1.94) | 0.391 |
| Dialysis duration (month) | 38(19,61) | 34(22,94) | 0.649 |
| eGFR [mL/(min·1.73 m2)] | 5.00(4.05,5.60) | 4.40(3.60,6.10) | 0.934 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 955.20(829.43, | 0.772 | |
| CysC (mg/L) | 7.27(5.37,8.22) | 7.12(6.27,7.44) | 0.610 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 23.40(18.20,26.10) | 20.80(11.80,30.20) | 0.363 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 373.15(309.15,416.43) | 291.70(274.20,394.25) | 0.080 |
| ALT (U/L) | 12.70(9.43,19.00) | 8.50(6.80,15.20) | 0.045* |
| AST (U/L) | 12.20(10.30,17.20) | 11.50(9.20,20.40) | 0.895 |
| Urine volume (mL/24 h) | 0(0,200) | 0(0,365) | 0.678 |
| Kt/V | 1.62(1.40,1.88) | 1.57(1.34,1.73) | 0.581 |
| D/P | 0.70(0.61,0.76) | 0.68(0.60,0.73) | 0.349 |
| Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | 0.882(0.313,4.832) | 1.182(0.574,5.286) | 0.355 |
| Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | 85.0(75.0,92.0) | 86.0(76.4,88.4) | 0.783 |
| Peripheral blood WBC count (109/L) | 6.49(5.15,9.22) | 7.20(4.46,8.81) | 0.501 |
| Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage (%) | 79.8(68.2,83.8) | 73.1(63.6,82.5) | 0.214 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 26.16(12.08,85.2) | 15.68(12.45,43.80) | 0.155 |
| Bacterial species (%) | 0.500 | ||
| G+ | 11(52.38) | 11(68.75) | |
| G? | 10(47.62) | 5(31.25) | |
| Dosing interval (h) | 0.015* | ||
| 48 | 4(19.05) | 10(62.50) | |
| 72 | 17(80.95) | 6(37.50) | |
| History of peritonitis (%) | 0.022* | ||
| No | 15(71.43) | 5(31.25) | |
| Yes | 6(28.57) | 11(68.75) |
Table 2 Comparison of general information and laboratory indicators between the two groups
| Variable | Low-serum concentration group | High-serum concentration group | P |
| Sex (%) | 0.742 | ||
| Male | 12(57.14) | 10(62.50) | |
| Female | 9(42.86) | 6(37.50) | |
| Age (years) | 46(37,63) | 48(37,65) | 0.978 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.80(1.70,1.96) | 1.84(1.56,1.94) | 0.391 |
| Dialysis duration (month) | 38(19,61) | 34(22,94) | 0.649 |
| eGFR [mL/(min·1.73 m2)] | 5.00(4.05,5.60) | 4.40(3.60,6.10) | 0.934 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 955.20(829.43, | 0.772 | |
| CysC (mg/L) | 7.27(5.37,8.22) | 7.12(6.27,7.44) | 0.610 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 23.40(18.20,26.10) | 20.80(11.80,30.20) | 0.363 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 373.15(309.15,416.43) | 291.70(274.20,394.25) | 0.080 |
| ALT (U/L) | 12.70(9.43,19.00) | 8.50(6.80,15.20) | 0.045* |
| AST (U/L) | 12.20(10.30,17.20) | 11.50(9.20,20.40) | 0.895 |
| Urine volume (mL/24 h) | 0(0,200) | 0(0,365) | 0.678 |
| Kt/V | 1.62(1.40,1.88) | 1.57(1.34,1.73) | 0.581 |
| D/P | 0.70(0.61,0.76) | 0.68(0.60,0.73) | 0.349 |
| Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | 0.882(0.313,4.832) | 1.182(0.574,5.286) | 0.355 |
| Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | 85.0(75.0,92.0) | 86.0(76.4,88.4) | 0.783 |
| Peripheral blood WBC count (109/L) | 6.49(5.15,9.22) | 7.20(4.46,8.81) | 0.501 |
| Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage (%) | 79.8(68.2,83.8) | 73.1(63.6,82.5) | 0.214 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 26.16(12.08,85.2) | 15.68(12.45,43.80) | 0.155 |
| Bacterial species (%) | 0.500 | ||
| G+ | 11(52.38) | 11(68.75) | |
| G? | 10(47.62) | 5(31.25) | |
| Dosing interval (h) | 0.015* | ||
| 48 | 4(19.05) | 10(62.50) | |
| 72 | 17(80.95) | 6(37.50) | |
| History of peritonitis (%) | 0.022* | ||
| No | 15(71.43) | 5(31.25) | |
| Yes | 6(28.57) | 11(68.75) |
| Variable | Univariate logistic | Multivariate logistic | |||
| OR(95%CI) | P | OR(95%CI) | P | ||
| Sex (%) | |||||
| Male | Reference | ||||
| Female | 1.006(0.296,3.422) | 0.992 | |||
| Age (years) | 0.999(0.963,1.036) | 0.966 | |||
| BSA (m2) | 0.290(0.016,5.194) | 0.400 | |||
| Dialysis duration (month) | 1.003(0.992,1.015) | 0.597 | |||
| Scr (μmol/L) | 1.117(0.677,1.842) | 0.666 | |||
| CysC (mg/L) | 0.943(0.658,1.352) | 0.749 | |||
| Urea (mmol/L) | 0.977(0.921,1.036) | 0.440 | |||
| UA (μmol/L) | 0.996(0.990,1.001) | 0.114 | |||
| ALT (U/L) | 0.961(0.907,1.019) | 0.183 | |||
| AST (U/L) | 1.043(0.980,1.110) | 0.183 | |||
| Urine volume (mL/24 h) | 1.146(0.695,1.891) | 0.593 | |||
| Kt/V | 0.869(0.296,2.546) | 0.798 | |||
| D/P | 0.081(0.000,14.740) | 0.344 | |||
| Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | 0.959(0.834,1.102) | 0.552 | |||
| Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | 0.989(0.947,1.032) | 0.604 | |||
| Peripheral blood WBC count (109/L) | 1.059(0.907,1.237) | 0.470 | |||
| Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage (%) | 0.973(0.927,1.021) | 0.266 | |||
| CRP (mg/L) | 0.986(0.972,1.001) | 0.066 | 0.986(0.969,1.004) | 0.138 | |
| Bacterial species (%) | |||||
| G+ | Reference | ||||
| G? | 0.450(0.160,1.267) | 0.130 | |||
| Dosing interval (h) | |||||
| 48 | Reference | ||||
| 72 | 0.158(0.052,0.485) | 0.001 | 0.092(0.021,0.400) | 0.001 | |
| History of peritonitis (%) | |||||
| No | Reference | ||||
| Yes | 2.719(1.551,4.767) | 0.000 | 3.207(1.568,6.560) | 0.001 | |
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of the influencing factors Vancomycin blood concentration
| Variable | Univariate logistic | Multivariate logistic | |||
| OR(95%CI) | P | OR(95%CI) | P | ||
| Sex (%) | |||||
| Male | Reference | ||||
| Female | 1.006(0.296,3.422) | 0.992 | |||
| Age (years) | 0.999(0.963,1.036) | 0.966 | |||
| BSA (m2) | 0.290(0.016,5.194) | 0.400 | |||
| Dialysis duration (month) | 1.003(0.992,1.015) | 0.597 | |||
| Scr (μmol/L) | 1.117(0.677,1.842) | 0.666 | |||
| CysC (mg/L) | 0.943(0.658,1.352) | 0.749 | |||
| Urea (mmol/L) | 0.977(0.921,1.036) | 0.440 | |||
| UA (μmol/L) | 0.996(0.990,1.001) | 0.114 | |||
| ALT (U/L) | 0.961(0.907,1.019) | 0.183 | |||
| AST (U/L) | 1.043(0.980,1.110) | 0.183 | |||
| Urine volume (mL/24 h) | 1.146(0.695,1.891) | 0.593 | |||
| Kt/V | 0.869(0.296,2.546) | 0.798 | |||
| D/P | 0.081(0.000,14.740) | 0.344 | |||
| Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | 0.959(0.834,1.102) | 0.552 | |||
| Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | 0.989(0.947,1.032) | 0.604 | |||
| Peripheral blood WBC count (109/L) | 1.059(0.907,1.237) | 0.470 | |||
| Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage (%) | 0.973(0.927,1.021) | 0.266 | |||
| CRP (mg/L) | 0.986(0.972,1.001) | 0.066 | 0.986(0.969,1.004) | 0.138 | |
| Bacterial species (%) | |||||
| G+ | Reference | ||||
| G? | 0.450(0.160,1.267) | 0.130 | |||
| Dosing interval (h) | |||||
| 48 | Reference | ||||
| 72 | 0.158(0.052,0.485) | 0.001 | 0.092(0.021,0.400) | 0.001 | |
| History of peritonitis (%) | |||||
| No | Reference | ||||
| Yes | 2.719(1.551,4.767) | 0.000 | 3.207(1.568,6.560) | 0.001 | |
| Variable | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | T | P | Collinearity diagnostics | ||
| B | Standard error | Beta | VIF | ||||
| CRP | ?0.002 | 0.001 | ?0.194 | ?1.881 | 0.065 | 1.039 | |
| Dosing interval | ?0.408 | 0.103 | ?0.400 | ?3.954 | <0.001 | 1.007 | |
| History of peritonitis | 0.383 | 0.103 | 0.393 | 3.815 | <0.001 | 1.044 | |
| R2 | 0.399 | ||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.369 | ||||||
Table 4 Multiple linear regression analysis of factors influencing the first serum concentration of vancomycin
| Variable | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | T | P | Collinearity diagnostics | ||
| B | Standard error | Beta | VIF | ||||
| CRP | ?0.002 | 0.001 | ?0.194 | ?1.881 | 0.065 | 1.039 | |
| Dosing interval | ?0.408 | 0.103 | ?0.400 | ?3.954 | <0.001 | 1.007 | |
| History of peritonitis | 0.383 | 0.103 | 0.393 | 3.815 | <0.001 | 1.044 | |
| R2 | 0.399 | ||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.369 | ||||||
Fig.3 Stratified analysis of the impact of dosing interval and peritonitis history on the first serum concentration of vancomycin ($\bar x$±s) bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with previous PDRP; eP<0.05, compared with previous 72 h.
| Group | Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | P | Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | P | Days to negative conversion (d) | ||
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||||
| Low-serum concentration group (n=11) | 0.396(0.226,6.238) | 0.020(0.007,0.026) | <0.001 | 80.7(75.0,90.9) | 10.0(6.4,22.7) | <0.001 | 5(2,8) |
| High-serum concentration group (n=11) | 1.182(0.574,6.285) | 0.011(0.004,0.43) | <0.001 | 86.4(78.0,87.2) | 9.3(0.0,18.0) | <0.001 | 5(3,7) |
| P | 0.158 | 0.641 | 0.821 | 0.373 | 0.798 | ||
Table 5 Comparison of cell components in peritoneal dialysis fluid before and after treatment in two groups
| Group | Peritoneal dialysate nucleated cell count (109/L) | P | Percentage of neutrophils in dialysate (%) | P | Days to negative conversion (d) | ||
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||||
| Low-serum concentration group (n=11) | 0.396(0.226,6.238) | 0.020(0.007,0.026) | <0.001 | 80.7(75.0,90.9) | 10.0(6.4,22.7) | <0.001 | 5(2,8) |
| High-serum concentration group (n=11) | 1.182(0.574,6.285) | 0.011(0.004,0.43) | <0.001 | 86.4(78.0,87.2) | 9.3(0.0,18.0) | <0.001 | 5(3,7) |
| P | 0.158 | 0.641 | 0.821 | 0.373 | 0.798 | ||
| Group | CRP (mg/L) | P | |
| Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Low-serum concentration group (n=11) | 20.41(15.60,44.55) | 4.89(3.00,7.70) | 0.001 |
| High-serum concentration group (n=11) | 16.44(12.93,43.80) | 6.56(5.59,7.72) | <0.001 |
| P | 0.598 | 0.045 | |
Table 6 Comparison of CRP before and after treatment in two groups
| Group | CRP (mg/L) | P | |
| Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Low-serum concentration group (n=11) | 20.41(15.60,44.55) | 4.89(3.00,7.70) | 0.001 |
| High-serum concentration group (n=11) | 16.44(12.93,43.80) | 6.56(5.59,7.72) | <0.001 |
| P | 0.598 | 0.045 | |
| Author (Year) | Country | Case number | Dosage regimen | Serum concentration target | Main conclusions |
| Xie Jing et al.(2024)[ | China | 40 | 0.5 g vancomycin, administered qd, qod and q2d; Adjusting dosing regimens based on the serum concentration. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | First serum concentration is difficult to achieve target; Clinical efficacy correlates with concentrations ≥10 μg/mL but not with 15 μg/mL. |
| Cai Le et al.(2021)[ | China | 24 | 1 g vancomycin, administered qd, qod and q2d. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | First serum concentration is difficult to achieve target. |
| Hang Yong Fu et al.(2019)[ | China | 41 | 1 g vancomycin, administered q3d, q4d and q5d. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | First serum concentration is difficult to achieve target. No correlation between serum concentration and clinical efficacy at 10 or 15 μg/mL. |
| Ma Ying et al.(2023)[ | China | 56 | 15 mg/kg vancomycin, administered on Day1, re-dose 0.5 g on Day3 if serum concentration <15 μg/mL; Adjusting dosing regimens based on the serum concentration on Day5. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | No correlation between serum concentration and clinical efficacy. |
| Sarah Stevenson et al.(2015)[ | Australia | 34 | 30 mg/kg vancomycin (max 2.0 g), check serum concentration every 2-3 days and re-dose 30 mg/kg vancomycin (max 2.0 g) if <15 μg/mL. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | No correlation between serum concentration and clinical efficacy. |
Table 7 Overview of domestic and international studies on vancomycin serum concentrations in peritoneal dialysis–related peritonitis
| Author (Year) | Country | Case number | Dosage regimen | Serum concentration target | Main conclusions |
| Xie Jing et al.(2024)[ | China | 40 | 0.5 g vancomycin, administered qd, qod and q2d; Adjusting dosing regimens based on the serum concentration. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | First serum concentration is difficult to achieve target; Clinical efficacy correlates with concentrations ≥10 μg/mL but not with 15 μg/mL. |
| Cai Le et al.(2021)[ | China | 24 | 1 g vancomycin, administered qd, qod and q2d. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | First serum concentration is difficult to achieve target. |
| Hang Yong Fu et al.(2019)[ | China | 41 | 1 g vancomycin, administered q3d, q4d and q5d. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | First serum concentration is difficult to achieve target. No correlation between serum concentration and clinical efficacy at 10 or 15 μg/mL. |
| Ma Ying et al.(2023)[ | China | 56 | 15 mg/kg vancomycin, administered on Day1, re-dose 0.5 g on Day3 if serum concentration <15 μg/mL; Adjusting dosing regimens based on the serum concentration on Day5. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | No correlation between serum concentration and clinical efficacy. |
| Sarah Stevenson et al.(2015)[ | Australia | 34 | 30 mg/kg vancomycin (max 2.0 g), check serum concentration every 2-3 days and re-dose 30 mg/kg vancomycin (max 2.0 g) if <15 μg/mL. | 15 μg/mL (ISPD guideline) | No correlation between serum concentration and clinical efficacy. |
| 1 |
Yu J, Zhu L, Ni J, et al. Technique failure in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: risk factors and patient survival[J]. Ren Fail, 2023, 45 (1): 2205536.
doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2205536 |
| 2 |
Li PKT, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2022, 42 (2): 110- 153.
doi: 10.1177/08968608221080586 |
| 3 | 中国腹膜透析相关感染防治专家组. 腹膜透析相关感染的防治指南[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2018, 34 (2): 139- 148. |
| 4 |
Ma Y, Geng Y, Jin L, et al. Serum vancomycin levels predict the short-term adverse outcomes of peritoneal dialysis–associated peritonitis[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2023, 43 (1): 37- 44.
doi: 10.1177/08968608211064192 |
| 5 | 谢静, 张莹, 沈正泽. 万古霉素腹腔给药治疗腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的血药浓度监测结果分析[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2024, 24 (7): 789- 792. |
| 6 |
杭永付, 徐德宇, 薛领, 等. 腹透相关性腹膜炎腹腔给予万古霉素血药浓度的特点及与疗效的关系[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2019, 54 (12): 1031- 1034.
doi: 10.11669/cpj.2019.12.019 |
| 7 |
何娜, 苏珊, 翟所迪, 等. 《中国万古霉素治疗药物监测指南(2020更新版)》解读[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2021, 19 (1): 12- 16.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3384.2021.01.003 |
| 8 | 蔡乐, 张庆涛, 谢大洋, 等. 腹膜透析相关腹膜炎患者万古霉素血药浓度监测结果分析[J]. 中国药物应用与监测, 2021, 18 (1): 13- 17. |
| 9 |
Stevenson S, Tang W, Cho Y, et al. The role of monitoring vancomycin levels in patients with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2015, 35 (2): 222- 228.
doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00156 |
| 10 | 辛洋洋, 阳晓. 腹膜透析标准化临床结局的研究进展[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2023, 39 (8): 630- 634. |
| 11 | 董雪, 任天舒, 孙飞龙, 等. 腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎初始经验抗菌治疗方案研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2017, 45 (3): 300- 303. |
| 12 |
Dogan CZ, Kara E, Pinar A, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients treated with vancomycin: a single center, prospective, observational, real-world study[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2025, 44 (9): 2159- 2165.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05182-w |
| 13 |
Deacon E, Canney M, McCormick B, et al. The association between serum vancomycin level and clinical outcome in patients with peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis[J]. Kidney Int Rep, 2023, 8 (12): 2646- 2653.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.09.013 |
| 14 |
袁世轩, 吕子彦, 杨勇, 等. 模型引导下的万古霉素血药浓度监测临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2024, 29 (12): 1344- 1352.
doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2024.12.004 |
| 15 |
Blowey DL, Warady BA, Abdel–Rahman S, et al. Vancomycin disposition following intraperitoneal administration in children receiving peritoneal dialysis[J]. Perit Dial Int J Int Soc Perit Dial, 2007, 27 (1): 79- 85.
doi: 10.1177/089686080702700117 |
| 16 |
Liu W, Qiao Z, Xu Y, et al. Adjusting dialysis dose (Kt) scaled to body surface area (BSA) could be a more logical approach[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19 (10): e0311175.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311175 |
| 17 | 王牡丹, 黄丽娃, 陈连国, 等. 腹透相关性腹膜炎患者血清万古霉素谷浓度与临床疗效的关系[J]. 中国现代医生, 2017, 55 (12): 9- 12. |
| 18 |
Terri M, Trionfetti F, Montaldo C, et al. Mechanisms of peritoneal fibrosis: focus on immune cells–peritoneal stroma interactions[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12, 607204.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.607204 |
| 19 |
Farkas A, Oikonomou K, Ghanbar M, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal gentamicin and the impact of varying dwell times on pharmacodynamic target attainment in patients with acute peritonitis undergoing peritoneal dialysis[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2022, 66 (2): e01679- 21.
doi: 10.1128/aac.01679-21 |
| 20 |
Bonomini M, Masola V, Monaco MP, et al. Coupling osmotic efficacy with biocompatibility in peritoneal dialysis: a stiff challenge[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25 (6): 3532.
doi: 10.3390/ijms25063532 |
| 21 |
Geilen J, Kainz M, Zapletal B, et al. Effects of lung inflammation and injury on pulmonary tissue penetration of meropenem and vancomycin in a model of unilateral lung injury[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2024, 64 (1): 107180.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107180 |
| 22 |
Chen Z, Taubert M, Chen C, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with external ventricular drain[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2023, 67 (6): e00241- 23.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00241-23 |
| 23 | 叶寅寅, 周茹, 宋霞, 等. 万古霉素血药浓度测定在腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎患者治疗中的作用[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2021, 46 (3): 350- 354. |
| 24 |
王敏, 邢玲玲, 张春霞, 等. 难治性腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎发生的影响因素及拔管风险预测[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39 (9): 1143- 1147.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.09.014 |
| [1] | CHANG Zhao, ZHOU Yuxue, ZHANG Shengnan, LV Meng . Clinical efficacy and influence factors about intra-patient variation of tacrolimus concentration in children with nephrotic syndrome [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(11): 1524-1529. |
| [2] | YUAN Shixuan, LV Ziyan, YANG Yong, CHEN Lu, ZHANG Lijuan. Clinical study on model-guided vancomycin plasma concentration monitoring [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(12): 1344-1352. |
| [3] | WU Lili, LIANG Zhi, HUANG Siyong, WANG Yan. Effect of augmented renal clearance (ARC) on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of vancomycin in patients with infective endocarditis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2023, 28(10): 1139-1145. |
| [4] | LIN Liangmo, FU Xiangjun, ZHONG Lili, WANG Hefang, WU Qiongshi, XIAO Jian. Establishment of population pharmacokinetics model of vancomycin in patients with Neutropenia [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2021, 26(9): 1014-1022. |
| [5] | FU Xiangjun, HUANG Li, GUO Li, LIN Liangmo. Application of AUC/MIC as the therapeutic drug monitoring target of vancomycin in patients with severe infections of multi drug resistant gram positive bacteria [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2021, 26(7): 775-781. |
| [6] | GUO Xianzhong, LIN Rongfang, LIN Weiwei. Development of software for individualizing dosage regimens of vancomycin based on population pharmacokinetics models [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2021, 26(1): 30-39. |
| [7] | JIANG Hui,MIAO Miao,XU Wenke. Effects of ABCB13435C/T and 2677T/G gene polymorphisms on serum concentration of digoxin in Han population [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2019, 24(2): 188-191. |
| [8] | ZHU Min, ZHANG Cuifeng, GUO Yiyun, ZHU Ziming. Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in elderly infectious patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2019, 24(2): 158-163. |
| [9] | CHEN Yaoyao,SHI Daohua,LIU Guanghua,NIU Peiguang,LIU Baichen. Effects of OCT2 and MDR1 gene polymorphisms on vancomycin concentration and clinical efficacy in infants [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(2): 154-158. |
| [10] | DING Zhirong, CAI Xiaozhen, ZENG Haiwen, LIN Tianlai. Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in post-operative neurosurgical patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(11): 1252-1257. |
| [11] | YU Huajun, HUANG Kai, ZHANG Zhan, GUO Qiaofeng, ZHANG Xiaowen, ZHANG Chun. Efficacy and safety of vancomycin calcium sulfate combined with ultrashort wave in the treatment of traumatic osteomyelitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2017, 22(5): 556-559. |
| [12] | SUN Xiao-xiao, SHAO Hua, WANG You-qun. Research progress of vancomycin nephrotoxicity [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2014, 19(5): 597-600. |
| [13] | LI Jian-hua, ZHONG Hua, SHEN Wei-min, SUN Ju-shui, CHEN Hai-zhi, FAN Zhen-guo, LU Gui-hua. Relationship between serum concentration and clinical efficacy of aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2011, 16(1): 76-81. |
| [14] | TANG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Ke-ying, XIAO Xing-feng. Analysis of the monitoring results and the influencing factors of blood concentration of valproate in patients with epilepsy [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2010, 15(9): 1051-1055. |
| [15] | HUA Jun-yan, TIAN Wei-qiang, ZHU Ya-yan, YU Hui-kang. Efficacy and plasma concentration analysis of Vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2010, 15(6): 673-677. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||