Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 324-336.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2026.03.004
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ke ZHANG1,2(
), Ziting LI1,2, Fofo JIANG1,2, Feng ZHAO1, Yinling MA1,2,*(
), Guoxun PANG1,2,*(
)
Received:2025-06-11
Revised:2025-08-07
Online:2026-03-26
Published:2026-04-03
Contact:
Yinling MA,Guoxun PANG
E-mail:1789884192@qq.com;paper@hebmu.edu.cn;13503291608@163.com
CLC Number:
Ke ZHANG, Ziting LI, Fofo JIANG, Feng ZHAO, Yinling MA, Guoxun PANG. Effect of Dan-Lou tablets on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of atorvastatin in high-fat diet-fed rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(3): 324-336.
| Compound | ATV | o-ATV | p-ATV | CMZ (IS) |
| Quantitative ion transition (m/z) | 559.3→440.6 | 575.3→440.3 | 575.3→440.3 | 237.2→194.2 |
| DP, V | 130 | 91 | 91 | 110 |
| CE, eV | 30 | 33 | 33 | 13 |
Table 1 MS parameters of the analyte and internal standard
| Compound | ATV | o-ATV | p-ATV | CMZ (IS) |
| Quantitative ion transition (m/z) | 559.3→440.6 | 575.3→440.3 | 575.3→440.3 | 237.2→194.2 |
| DP, V | 130 | 91 | 91 | 110 |
| CE, eV | 30 | 33 | 33 | 13 |
| Group | Body weight (g) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) |
| Normal diet group | 185.33±3.96 | 1.39±0.21 | 0.13±0.03 | 2.66±0.11 | 0.46±0.03 |
| High-fat diet group | 373.33±34.58c | 3.36±0.38c | 0.93±0.38c | 0.74±0.11c | 1.03±0.02c |
Table 2 Comparison of serum lipid profiles between Normal diet and High-fat diet groups in rats (Mean ± SD, n=5)
| Group | Body weight (g) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) |
| Normal diet group | 185.33±3.96 | 1.39±0.21 | 0.13±0.03 | 2.66±0.11 | 0.46±0.03 |
| High-fat diet group | 373.33±34.58c | 3.36±0.38c | 0.93±0.38c | 0.74±0.11c | 1.03±0.02c |
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | Intra-day | Inter-day | |||||
| Determined concentrations (ng/mL) | Accuracy (%) | RSD (%) | Determined concentrations (ng/mL) | Accuracy (%) | RSD (%) | |||
| ATV | 0.1 | 0.11±0.005 | 9.00 | 4.93 | 0.11±0.002 | 10.20 | 1.54 | |
| 0.5 | 0.46±0.03 | ?7.49 | 6.15 | 0.47±0.009 | ?6.16 | 2.00 | ||
| 100 | 97.01±3.16 | ?2.99 | 3.26 | 98.24±1.73 | ?1.76 | 1.76 | ||
| 250 | 249.71±4.82 | ?0.11 | 1.93 | 251.43±2.42 | 0.57 | 0.96 | ||
| o-ATV | 0.1 | 0.11±0.003 | 7.58 | 3.14 | 0.11±0.004 | 7.70 | 3.80 | |
| 0.5 | 0.46±0.009 | ?7.19 | 1.93 | 0.46±0.004 | ?7.74 | 0.84 | ||
| 10 | 9.48±0.34 | ?10.50 | 7.52 | 10.54±0.09 | ?4.62 | 1.97 | ||
| 24 | 24.55±0.84 | 2.27 | 3.41 | 24.63±0.12 | 2.61 | 0.47 | ||
| p-ATV | 0.1 | 0.11±0.006 | 12.08 | 5.23 | 0.11±0.008 | 12.72 | 7.07 | |
| 0.5 | 0.52±0.02 | 3.00 | 3.59 | 0.51±0.003 | 2.54 | 0.61 | ||
| 10 | 10.42±0.13 | 4.22 | 1.20 | 10.42±1.39 | 4.19 | 0.13 | ||
| 24 | 22.13±0.66 | ?7.80 | 3.00 | 22.00±0.11 | ?8.34 | 0.52 | ||
Table 3 Intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy of ATV, o-ATV and p-ATV in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS (Mean ± SD)
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | Intra-day | Inter-day | |||||
| Determined concentrations (ng/mL) | Accuracy (%) | RSD (%) | Determined concentrations (ng/mL) | Accuracy (%) | RSD (%) | |||
| ATV | 0.1 | 0.11±0.005 | 9.00 | 4.93 | 0.11±0.002 | 10.20 | 1.54 | |
| 0.5 | 0.46±0.03 | ?7.49 | 6.15 | 0.47±0.009 | ?6.16 | 2.00 | ||
| 100 | 97.01±3.16 | ?2.99 | 3.26 | 98.24±1.73 | ?1.76 | 1.76 | ||
| 250 | 249.71±4.82 | ?0.11 | 1.93 | 251.43±2.42 | 0.57 | 0.96 | ||
| o-ATV | 0.1 | 0.11±0.003 | 7.58 | 3.14 | 0.11±0.004 | 7.70 | 3.80 | |
| 0.5 | 0.46±0.009 | ?7.19 | 1.93 | 0.46±0.004 | ?7.74 | 0.84 | ||
| 10 | 9.48±0.34 | ?10.50 | 7.52 | 10.54±0.09 | ?4.62 | 1.97 | ||
| 24 | 24.55±0.84 | 2.27 | 3.41 | 24.63±0.12 | 2.61 | 0.47 | ||
| p-ATV | 0.1 | 0.11±0.006 | 12.08 | 5.23 | 0.11±0.008 | 12.72 | 7.07 | |
| 0.5 | 0.52±0.02 | 3.00 | 3.59 | 0.51±0.003 | 2.54 | 0.61 | ||
| 10 | 10.42±0.13 | 4.22 | 1.20 | 10.42±1.39 | 4.19 | 0.13 | ||
| 24 | 22.13±0.66 | ?7.80 | 3.00 | 22.00±0.11 | ?8.34 | 0.52 | ||
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | Extraction Recovery% | RSD% | Matrix effect% | RSD% |
| ATV | 0.5 | 91.24 | 3.98 | 111.29 | 10.17 |
| 150 | 105.92 | 8.35 | 113.99 | 11.92 | |
| 300 | 103.65 | 11.38 | 109.83 | 12.36 | |
| o-ATV | 0.5 | 97.44 | 7.21 | 97.32 | 5.84 |
| 10 | 92.05 | 7.70 | 102.17 | 11.02 | |
| 24 | 104.63 | 11.64 | 95.12 | 12.89 | |
| p-ATV | 0.5 | 100.14 | 9.12 | 101.22 | 10.98 |
| 10 | 103.35 | 9.86 | 96.32 | 5.94 | |
| 24 | 97.15 | 10.27 | 102.20 | 8.58 |
Table 4 Matrix effect and extraction recovery of ATV, o-ATV and p-ATV in rat plasma (Mean ± SD)
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | Extraction Recovery% | RSD% | Matrix effect% | RSD% |
| ATV | 0.5 | 91.24 | 3.98 | 111.29 | 10.17 |
| 150 | 105.92 | 8.35 | 113.99 | 11.92 | |
| 300 | 103.65 | 11.38 | 109.83 | 12.36 | |
| o-ATV | 0.5 | 97.44 | 7.21 | 97.32 | 5.84 |
| 10 | 92.05 | 7.70 | 102.17 | 11.02 | |
| 24 | 104.63 | 11.64 | 95.12 | 12.89 | |
| p-ATV | 0.5 | 100.14 | 9.12 | 101.22 | 10.98 |
| 10 | 103.35 | 9.86 | 96.32 | 5.94 | |
| 24 | 97.15 | 10.27 | 102.20 | 8.58 |
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | Room temperature for 2 h | 8 h at 4 ℃ | Three freezes-thraws (?80 ℃) | |||||
| Measured concentration (ng/mL) | RSD% | Measured concentration (ng/mL) | RSD% | Measured concentration (ng/mL) | RSD% | ||||
| ATV | 0.5 | 0.56±0.02 | 3.04 | 0.54±0.03 | 5.84 | 0.53±0.03 | 5.97 | ||
| 100 | 105.60±3.21 | 3.04 | 105.40±3.21 | 3.04 | 103.80±2.59 | 2.49 | |||
| 250 | 245.60± 9.58 | 3.90 | 247±5.52 | 2.24 | 245.80±8.81 | 3.59 | |||
| o-ATV | 0.5 | 0.46±0.01 | 1.17 | 0.46±0.01 | 1.66 | 0.46±0.004 | 0.87 | ||
| 10 | 9.34±0.35 | 3.70 | 9.64±0.21 | 2.19 | 9.64±0.19 | 1.96 | |||
| 24 | 24.17±0.86 | 3.57 | 24.18±0.81 | 3.36 | 24.24±1.02 | 4.21 | |||
| p-ATV | 0.5 | 0.53±0.02 | 4.71 | 0.50±0.003 | 0.51 | 0.53±0.02 | 3.70 | ||
| 10 | 10.43±0.28 | 2.68 | 10.32±0.19 | 1.82 | 10.43±0.13 | 1.23 | |||
| 24 | 22.86±0.61 | 2.65 | 23.12±0.80 | 3.48 | 21.73±0.22 | 0.99 | |||
Table 5 Stability of ATV, o-ATV, and p-ATV in rat plasma under various storage conditions (Mean ±SD)
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | Room temperature for 2 h | 8 h at 4 ℃ | Three freezes-thraws (?80 ℃) | |||||
| Measured concentration (ng/mL) | RSD% | Measured concentration (ng/mL) | RSD% | Measured concentration (ng/mL) | RSD% | ||||
| ATV | 0.5 | 0.56±0.02 | 3.04 | 0.54±0.03 | 5.84 | 0.53±0.03 | 5.97 | ||
| 100 | 105.60±3.21 | 3.04 | 105.40±3.21 | 3.04 | 103.80±2.59 | 2.49 | |||
| 250 | 245.60± 9.58 | 3.90 | 247±5.52 | 2.24 | 245.80±8.81 | 3.59 | |||
| o-ATV | 0.5 | 0.46±0.01 | 1.17 | 0.46±0.01 | 1.66 | 0.46±0.004 | 0.87 | ||
| 10 | 9.34±0.35 | 3.70 | 9.64±0.21 | 2.19 | 9.64±0.19 | 1.96 | |||
| 24 | 24.17±0.86 | 3.57 | 24.18±0.81 | 3.36 | 24.24±1.02 | 4.21 | |||
| p-ATV | 0.5 | 0.53±0.02 | 4.71 | 0.50±0.003 | 0.51 | 0.53±0.02 | 3.70 | ||
| 10 | 10.43±0.28 | 2.68 | 10.32±0.19 | 1.82 | 10.43±0.13 | 1.23 | |||
| 24 | 22.86±0.61 | 2.65 | 23.12±0.80 | 3.48 | 21.73±0.22 | 0.99 | |||
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Normal group | High-fat diet group | |||||
| ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ||
| AUC0-24h (μg·L?1h?1) | 127.58±43.22 | 331.06±222.726c | 108.73±23.30 | 148.92±43.53 | 224.81±123.74 | 308.87±18.87b | |
| AUC0-∞ (μg·L?1h?1) | 129.75±42.85 | 465.86±455.58c | 131.27±35.42 | 165.25±43.29 | 487.11±600.05 | 856.88±367.62b | |
| t1/2z(h) | 3.22±1.25 | 14.35±14.01c | 9.93±7.81c | 10.62±5.18 | 38.38±44.13b | 40.62±22.54b | |
| Tmax(h) | 0.23±0.18 | 0.22±0.17 | 0.13±0.05c | 0.25±0.29 | 0.62±0.82 | 0.12±0.08 | |
| Vz/F(L/kg) | 138.65±62.30 | 177.40±111.67 | 358.57±212.41c | 357.36±198.04 | 447.57±483.68 | 227.31±64.91 | |
| CLz/F (L·h?1kg?1) | 30.13±9.16 | 11.92±5.83c | 29.24±8.49 | 23.14±6.49 | 14.07±7.32 | 5.28±3.36b | |
| Cmax(μg/L) | 94.84±89.49 | 187.45±124.56c | 70.03±37.36b | 89.41±41.43 | 96.50±56.34 | 143.95±79.01 | |
Table 6 Pharmacokinetic parameters of ATV after administration (Mean ± SD, n=5)
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Normal group | High-fat diet group | |||||
| ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ||
| AUC0-24h (μg·L?1h?1) | 127.58±43.22 | 331.06±222.726c | 108.73±23.30 | 148.92±43.53 | 224.81±123.74 | 308.87±18.87b | |
| AUC0-∞ (μg·L?1h?1) | 129.75±42.85 | 465.86±455.58c | 131.27±35.42 | 165.25±43.29 | 487.11±600.05 | 856.88±367.62b | |
| t1/2z(h) | 3.22±1.25 | 14.35±14.01c | 9.93±7.81c | 10.62±5.18 | 38.38±44.13b | 40.62±22.54b | |
| Tmax(h) | 0.23±0.18 | 0.22±0.17 | 0.13±0.05c | 0.25±0.29 | 0.62±0.82 | 0.12±0.08 | |
| Vz/F(L/kg) | 138.65±62.30 | 177.40±111.67 | 358.57±212.41c | 357.36±198.04 | 447.57±483.68 | 227.31±64.91 | |
| CLz/F (L·h?1kg?1) | 30.13±9.16 | 11.92±5.83c | 29.24±8.49 | 23.14±6.49 | 14.07±7.32 | 5.28±3.36b | |
| Cmax(μg/L) | 94.84±89.49 | 187.45±124.56c | 70.03±37.36b | 89.41±41.43 | 96.50±56.34 | 143.95±79.01 | |
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Normal group | High-fat diet group | |||||
| ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ||
| AUC0-24h (μg·L?1h?1) | 39.86±11.09 | 133.02±18.86c | 34.16±4.44 | 42.98±10.38 | 52.86±16.54 | 33.05±13.30b | |
| AUC0-∞ (μg·L?1h?1) | 40.25±11.84 | 134.95±47.93c | 34.24±4.38 | 54.36±33.87 | 53.01±16.45 | 36.91±16.95b | |
| t1/2z(h) | 2.72±1.08 | 4.36±1.73c | 2.56±0.71 | 9.70±12.80 | 2.75±0.68 | 7.31±4.02b | |
| Tmax(h) | 2.10±2.24 | 0.28±0.14c | 1.35±0.60c | 1.85±1.39 | 1.60±0.55 | 1.95±2.35 | |
| Cmax(μg/L) | 7.53±2.00 | 52.76±14.61c | 5.90±1.81b | 7.91±3.75 | 9.95±5.92 | 6.41±5.42 | |
Table 7 Pharmacokinetic parameters of o-ATV after administration (Mean ± SD, n=5)
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Normal group | High-fat diet group | |||||
| ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ||
| AUC0-24h (μg·L?1h?1) | 39.86±11.09 | 133.02±18.86c | 34.16±4.44 | 42.98±10.38 | 52.86±16.54 | 33.05±13.30b | |
| AUC0-∞ (μg·L?1h?1) | 40.25±11.84 | 134.95±47.93c | 34.24±4.38 | 54.36±33.87 | 53.01±16.45 | 36.91±16.95b | |
| t1/2z(h) | 2.72±1.08 | 4.36±1.73c | 2.56±0.71 | 9.70±12.80 | 2.75±0.68 | 7.31±4.02b | |
| Tmax(h) | 2.10±2.24 | 0.28±0.14c | 1.35±0.60c | 1.85±1.39 | 1.60±0.55 | 1.95±2.35 | |
| Cmax(μg/L) | 7.53±2.00 | 52.76±14.61c | 5.90±1.81b | 7.91±3.75 | 9.95±5.92 | 6.41±5.42 | |
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Normal group | High-fat diet group | |||||
| ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ||
| AUC0-24h (μg·L?1h?1) | 26.16±17.51 | 23.18±7.42 | 10.75±1.10c | 21.00±15.08 | 17.11±3.22 | 16.24±1.77 | |
| AUC0-∞ (μg·L?1h?1) | 28.54±15.79 | 26.35±9.08 | 15.51±4.54c | 110.81±178.04 | 23.12±1.99 | 23.46±6.13 | |
| t1/2z(h) | 8.64±10.31 | 9.10±4.86 | 13.33±7.23b | 152.50±287.83 | 13.71±7.21 | 13.23±9.71 | |
| Tmax(h) | 3.10±2.70 | 0.23±0.07c | 3.60±1.67 | 2.25±1.70 | 2.80±1.10 | 4.40±1.67 | |
| Cmax(μg/L) | 12.83±15.70 | 7.89±5.70b | 0.85±0.12c | 8.10±15.28 | 1.72±0.62 | 1.51±0.67 | |
Table 8 Pharmacokinetic parameters of p-ATV after administration (Mean ± SD, n=5)
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Normal group | High-fat diet group | |||||
| ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ATV | DLT+ATV | DLT (7days)+ATV | ||
| AUC0-24h (μg·L?1h?1) | 26.16±17.51 | 23.18±7.42 | 10.75±1.10c | 21.00±15.08 | 17.11±3.22 | 16.24±1.77 | |
| AUC0-∞ (μg·L?1h?1) | 28.54±15.79 | 26.35±9.08 | 15.51±4.54c | 110.81±178.04 | 23.12±1.99 | 23.46±6.13 | |
| t1/2z(h) | 8.64±10.31 | 9.10±4.86 | 13.33±7.23b | 152.50±287.83 | 13.71±7.21 | 13.23±9.71 | |
| Tmax(h) | 3.10±2.70 | 0.23±0.07c | 3.60±1.67 | 2.25±1.70 | 2.80±1.10 | 4.40±1.67 | |
| Cmax(μg/L) | 12.83±15.70 | 7.89±5.70b | 0.85±0.12c | 8.10±15.28 | 1.72±0.62 | 1.51±0.67 | |
| Group | Body weight (g) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) |
| High-fat diet group | 373.33±34.58 | 3.36±0.38 | 0.93±0.38 | 0.74±0.11 | 1.03±0.02 |
| ATV group | 326.75±13.84c | 2.79±0.06c | 0.72±0.27c | 1.21±0.16c | 0.83±0.04c |
| DLT group | 348.17±9.89b | 2.46±0.23c | 0.71±0.14c | 0.69±0.10 | 0.63±0.06c |
| ATV+DLT group | 261.42±21.12c | 2.34±0.19c | 0.33±0.04c | 1.45±0.10c | 0.67±0.05c |
Table 9 Serum biochemical parameters and body weight changes in different treatment groups (Mean ± SD, n=5)
| Group | Body weight (g) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) |
| High-fat diet group | 373.33±34.58 | 3.36±0.38 | 0.93±0.38 | 0.74±0.11 | 1.03±0.02 |
| ATV group | 326.75±13.84c | 2.79±0.06c | 0.72±0.27c | 1.21±0.16c | 0.83±0.04c |
| DLT group | 348.17±9.89b | 2.46±0.23c | 0.71±0.14c | 0.69±0.10 | 0.63±0.06c |
| ATV+DLT group | 261.42±21.12c | 2.34±0.19c | 0.33±0.04c | 1.45±0.10c | 0.67±0.05c |
Fig.6 Serum biochemical parameters in different treatment groups (Mean ± SD, n=5) bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with high-fat diet group; fP<0.01, compared with atorvastatin group; iP<0.01, compared with Dan-Lou tablets group.
Fig.7 Body weight changes in different treatment groups (Mean ± SD, n=5) A: high fat diet group; B: atorvastatin group; C: Dan-Lou tablets group; D: atorvastatin combined with Dan-Lou tablets group. bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with high-fat diet group; fP<0.01, compared with atorvastatin group; iP<0.01, compared with Dan-Lou tablets group.
| 1 | Wei LL, Gu YZ, Luo Y, et al. Research progress on traditional Chinese medicine on regulating intestinal flora intreatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs, 2023, 54 (18): 6185- 6194. |
| 2 | Di RN, Fan QY, Fang HL. Mechanism analysis of Chuanxiong in the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases[J]. Mod Chin Med, 2022, 42, 22- 26. |
| 3 | Yu YF, Zhou ML, Luo XX, et al. Meta analysis and trial sequential analysis of colchicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease[J]. Chin Circ J, 2021, 36 (7): 659- 666. |
| 4 |
Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030[J]. PLoS Med, 2006, 3 (11): e442.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 |
| 5 |
Tang JJ, Li GX, Liu ZG, et al. Danlou tablet improves chronic intermittent hypoxia-induced dyslipidemia and arteriosclerosis by HIF-1alpha-Angptl4 mRNA signaling pathway[J]. Chin J Integr Med, 2022, 28 (6): 509- 517.
doi: 10.1007/s11655-020-3255-8 |
| 6 | Guo LL, Wang J, Lin F, et al. Effect of danlou tablet on arrhythmia model rats induced by transient myocardial ischemia/ reperfusion[J]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, 2014, 34 (9): 1125- 1129. |
| 7 |
Li Z, Cheng Q, He Y, et al. Effect of Dan-Lou tablets on coronary heart disease revealed by microarray analysis integrated with molecular mechanism studies[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9 (5): e15777.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15777 |
| 8 |
Li Z, Yang L, Liu Y, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects of Dan-Lou tablets in the treatment of coronary heart disease revealed by metabolomics integrated with molecular mechanism studies[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2019, 240, 111911.
doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.111911 |
| 9 |
Mao W, Lu P, Wan R, et al. Efficacy and safety of Danlou tablets in traditional Chinese medicine for coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10, 1100006.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1100006 |
| 10 |
Ray KK, Ference BA, Séverin T, et al. World Heart Federation Cholesterol Roadmap 2022[J]. Glob Heart, 2022, 17 (1): 75.
doi: 10.5334/gh.1154 |
| 11 |
Stranberg TE, Kovanen PT, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Drugs for dyslipidaemia: the legacy effect of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404 (10470): 2462- 2475.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02089-0 |
| 12 | Wang D, Li T, Tian Y, et al. Efects of atorvastatin on chronic subdural hematoma: a preliminary report from three medical centers[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2014, 336 (1/2): 237- 242. |
| 13 |
Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force. Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement[J]. JAMA, 2022, 328, 746- 753.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13044 |
| 14 |
Dorsch M, Kowalczyk M, Planque M, et al. Statins affect cancer cell plasticity with distinct consequences for tumor progression and metastasis[J]. Cell Rep, 2021, 37, 110056.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110056 |
| 15 |
Yusuf S, Bosch J, Dagenais G, et al. Cholesterol lowering in intermediate-risk persons without cardiovascular disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374 (21): 2021- 2031.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600176 |
| 16 |
Zhang T. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of disposition and drug-drug interactions for atorvastatin and its metabolites[J]. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2015, 77, 216- 229.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.06.019 |
| 17 |
Ding M, Ma W, Wang X, et al. A network pharmacology integrated pharmacokinetics strategy for uncovering pharmacological mechanism of compounds absorbed into the blood of Dan-Lou tablet on coronary heart disease[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2019, 242, 112055.
doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112055 |
| 18 | Zhang Y, Guo Z, Wang J, et al. Qinlian hongqu decoction ameliorates hyperlipidemia via the IRE1-α/IKKB-β/NF-κb signaling pathway: network pharmacology and experimental validation [J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2024, 318(Pt A): 116856. |
| 19 |
Wang L, Liu T, Zhang Q, et al. Correlation between dietary inflammation and mortality among hyperlipidemics[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2023, 22 (1): 206.
doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01975-0 |
| 20 |
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials[J]. Lancet, 2022, 400 (10355): 832- 845.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01545-8 |
| 21 |
Izzo AA, Ernst E. Interactions between herbal medicines and prescribed drugs: an updated systematic review[J]. Drugs, 2009, 69 (13): 1777- 1798.
doi: 10.2165/11317010-000000000-00000 |
| 22 | Jiang TA. Health benefits of culinary herbs and spices[J]. J AOAC Int, 2019, 102 (2): 395- 411. |
| 23 |
安冬青, 吴宗贵, 梁春, 等. 血脂异常中西医结合诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20 (3): 262- 269.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.03.002 |
| 24 |
Du G, Zhao H, Zhang Q, et al. A rapid method for simultaneous determination of 14 phenolic compounds in Radix puerariae using microwave-assisted extraction and ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection and time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2010, 1217, 705- 714.
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.017 |
| 25 |
Zhang X, Xiao HB, Xue XY, et al. Simultaneous characterization of isoflavonoids and astragalosides in two Astragalus species by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry[J]. J Sep Sci, 2007, 30 (13): 2059- 2069.
doi: 10.1002/jssc.200700014 |
| 26 |
Yang M, Liu A, Guan S, et al. Characterization of tanshinones in the roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza (Dan-shen) by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 2006, 20 (8): 1266- 1280.
doi: 10.1002/rcm.2447 |
| 27 |
Liu AH, Guo H, Ye M, et al. Detection, characterization and identification of phenolic acids in Danshen using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry[J]. J Chromatogr, 2007, 1161 (1/2): 170- 182.
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.081 |
| 28 |
Liu EH, Qi LW, Peng YB, et al. Rapid separation and identification of 54 major constituents in Buyang Huanwu decoction by ultra-fast HPLC system coupled with DAD-TOF/MS[J]. Biomed Chromatogr, 2009, 23 (8): 828- 842.
doi: 10.1002/bmc.1193 |
| 29 |
Chen L, Qi J, Chang YX, et al. Identification and determination of the major constituents in Traditional Chinese Medicinal formula Danggui-Shaoyao-San by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2009, 50 (2): 127- 137.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.03.039 |
| 30 |
Liu X, Li SL, Zhou Y, et al. Characterization of protostane triterpenoids in Alisma orientalis by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 2010, 24 (11): 1514- 1522.
doi: 10.1002/rcm.4548 |
| 31 |
Zhao W, Huang X, Li X, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of major triterpenoids in Alismatis Rhizoma by high performance liquid chromatography/diode-array detector/quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and ultra-performance liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry[J]. Molecules, 2015, 20 (8): 13958- 13981.
doi: 10.3390/molecules200813958 |
| 32 |
Chu C, Cai HX, Ren MT, et al. Characterization of novel astragaloside malonates from Radix astragali by HPLC with ESI quadrupole TOF MS[J]. J Sep Sci, 2010, 33 (4/5): 570- 581.
doi: 10.1002/jssc.200900687 |
| 33 |
Zhang XL, Liu LF, Zhu LY, et al. A high performance liquid chromatography fingerprinting and ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry chemical profiling approach to rapidly find characteristic chemical markers for quality evaluation of dispensing granules, a case study on Chuanxiong Rhizoma[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2014, 88, 391- 400.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.09.023 |
| 34 |
Qin ZF, Dai Y, Yao Z, et al. Study on chemical profiles and metabolites of Allii Macrostemonis Bulbus as well as its representative steroidal saponins in rats by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Food Chem, 2016, 192, 499- 515.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.040 |
| 35 |
Wang R, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Effects of salvianolic acid B and tanshinone IIA on the pharmacokinetics of losartan in rats by regulating the activities and expression of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2016, 180, 87- 96.
doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.01.021 |
| 36 |
Paine MF, Hart HL, Ludington SS, et al. The human intestinal cytochrome P450 "pie"[J]. Drug Metab Dispos, 2006, 34 (5): 880- 886.
doi: 10.1124/dmd.105.008672 |
| 37 |
Zhang Z, Zheng H, Zhang L, et al. Atorvastatin enhances LDL receptor-mediated LDL-C uptake and modulates PCSK9 protein expression in pancreatic β-cells[J]. Islets, 2025, 17 (1): 2479906.
doi: 10.1080/19382014.2025.2479906 |
| 38 |
Zhou S, Hua S, Chen X, et al. ZeXieYin formula alleviates atherosclerosis by regulating SBAs levels through the FXR/FGF15 pathway and restoring intestinal barrier integrity[J]. Chin Med, 2025, 20 (1): 68.
doi: 10.1186/s13020-025-01116-y |
| 39 |
Lyu Q, Xue W, Liu R, et al. A brain-to-gut signal controls intestinal fat absorption[J]. Nature, 2024, 634 (8035): 936- 943.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07929-5 |
| [1] | Yuan LIU, Cheng CUI, Miao YU, Wenyu JIN, Yinliang BAI, Yabin DUAN, Cao FANG, Jianchang HE, Yan HE, Hua HUANG, Shixia HUO, Yang JIN, Lin JIANG, Zhe JIANG, Zheng JIAO, Xuejun LI, Xiangyang LI, Hongjian LI, Lihong LIU, Yang LIU, Hongqiang QIU, Feng SUN, Jianjun SUN, Xuechang WANG, Jianhua WANG, Zhenlei WANG, Shijie WEI, Xiaowen YAN, Lei ZHANG, Xuenong ZHANG, Yuxin ZHANG, Jun ZHAO, Jiye YIN, Ru YAN, Xinchun WANG, Dongyang LIU. Expert consensus on the value and strategies of precise drug administration for multi-ethnic populations in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(1): 1-13. |
| [2] | Jing XIE, Xiaoni WANG, Jie MIN, Min LIU, Xu ZHU, Wang HU, Chang LU, Ran ZHANG, Huan ZHOU, Jian GONG. Study on bioequivalence evaluation of daclatasvir hydrochloride tablets in healthy Chinese subjects [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(1): 55-62. |
| [3] | WANG Yan, XIA Yuming, ZHU Rendi, OUYANG Ziwei, CHENG Yuanzhi, ZHOU Renpeng, HU Wei. Bioequivalence of ritonavir tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(9): 1193-1199. |
| [4] | WEI Yuanyuan1, MA Tao1, TANG Yuezhou1, LI Hubo1, 2, TIAN Xiaoyu1, 2, DANG Yunjie1, ZHOU Xu1. Individualized dosage study of vitamin D3 based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(8): 1067-1075. |
| [5] | WU Hao, JIANG Pin, ZHENG Wei, ZHANG Yu, ZUO Jian. Determination of concentration and pharmacokinetics of protein degradation targeted chimeric drug ARV-471 in mice by LC-MS/MS [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(6): 774-780. |
| [6] | TIAN Yan, YANG Xinyi, LIN Shuangshuang, HE Jinjie, WANG Jingjing, WEI Qiong, HUANG Xingxing, WU Xiaojie. Study on safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of YZJ-3058 tablets for single oral administration in healthy Chinese subjects [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(6): 796-803. |
| [7] | ZONG Jie, HU Xuan, DOU Guifang, MENG Zhiyun, ZHU Xiaoxia, GU RuoLan, WU Zhuona, GUAN Jingli, GAN Hui. Establishment and application of physiological-based pharmacokinetic model of ertapenem in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(5): 622-630. |
| [8] | XIE Jingxian, DU Jianjun, CHEN Lu, ZHANG Lijuan, YANG Yong. Advances in pharmacokinetics of isavuconazole in special population [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(5): 709-713. |
| [9] | MENG Qingheng, HAN Zhihui, LEI Qi, CHEN Bin, YIN Xia, HU Haitang, LIU Hongxia, ZHENG Qingshan, XU Ling, HUANG Qin. Optimizing the dosing regimen of aripiprazole microspheres by population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(4): 493-500. |
| [10] | DENG Yanru, CAO Gexi, LI Ying, LI Yajing, DONG Zhanjun. Research progress on pharmacokinetic interactions of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(4): 570-576. |
| [11] | ZHANG Qian, YANG Jingjing, WU Juan, ZHANG Qin, QIN Huiling, YU Liang, DU Yijun, HU Wei. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of recombinant human insulin in healthy Chinese volunteers by euglycemic clamp technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(3): 385-391. |
| [12] | LIU Jiahao, ZHANG Erhui, LIU Xiaoping. Pilot study on pharmacokinetics of HLX43 in rat serum by ELISA [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(12): 1675-1682. |
| [13] | GUO Lijia, DONG Zixuan, WU Huizhen. Research progress of lemborexant in the treatment of insomnia disorder [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(10): 1429-1435. |
| [14] | GONG Yan, GONG Weijing, LI Jiaxin, QIN Yanjie, LUO Li. Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric patients with diverse malignancies [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(1): 70-77. |
| [15] | LI Size, HUANG Qi, WU Xiaojie, WANG Shaonan, GUAN Yihui, XIE Fang, ZHANG Jing. The application of positron emission tomography in the research and development of central nervous system drugs [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(3): 316-327. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||