中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 245-246.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-03-07

• 科研论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市流动儿童和非流动儿童统合型房树人测试结果比较

张荣娟   

  1. 河南师范大学教育与教师发展学院,河南 新乡 453007
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-08 发布日期:2015-03-10 出版日期:2015-03-10
  • 作者简介:张荣娟(1978-),女,江西人,讲师,硕士学位,主要研究方向为人格评鉴和心理健康。
  • 基金资助:
    2014年河南省哲学社科规划课题(2014CJY037)

Comparison of Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test between migrant children and resident children

ZHANG Rong-juan   

  1. School of Education & Teachers Development,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang,Hennan 453007,China
  • Received:2014-06-08 Online:2015-03-10 Published:2015-03-10

摘要: 目的 对比城市流动儿童与非流动儿童在房树人投射绘画上表现的差异。方法 采用统合型房树人绘画测验方法对78例流动儿童和87名非流动儿童进行测试,并根据一定的编码对绘画作品进行评定,对两组被试在各单一条目及各维度上的得分进行比较。结果 两组儿童在攻击(t=3.39)、自卑退缩(t=6.23)、抑郁(t=6.86)和焦虑(t=5.50)各维度差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01),且各心理维度之间相关显著(r=0.28~0.59,P<0.05)。结论 流动儿童在攻击、自卑退缩、抑郁和焦虑等心理健康指标上得分高于非流动儿童,需加强有效的干预。

关键词: 统合型房树人, 流动儿童, 心理健康

Abstract: Objective To compare the performance on the projective drawing of House-Tree-Person Tests between migrant children and resident children. Methods Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test was adopted to 78 migrant children and 87 resident children,and drawing were rated according to some encoding criteria,then scores on each item and dimension were compared between two groups. Results There were great difference in aggression (t=3.39),inferiority and withdrawal (t=6.23),depression (t=6.86) and anxiety (t=5.50) between the two groups (P all<0.01).The relationships between all the psychological dimensions were significant (r=0.28~0.59,P<0.05). Conclusion Migrant children scored higher than resident children on some mental health indicators like aggression,inferiority and withdrawal,depression and anxiety,and some efficient interference should be considered.

Key words: Synthetic House-Tree-Person, migrant children, mental health

中图分类号: