中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-1244

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 839-844.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-1244

中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究

贾妮^1*, 许梦雪^1*, 丁美琦², 严双琴³, 章青兰⁴, 王宝珍⁵, 李园园⁶, 关宏岩¹

1.首都儿科研究所,北京 100020;
2.北京市海淀区妇幼保健院;
3.马鞍山妇幼保健院;
4.兰州市城关区妇幼保健中心;
5.银川市妇幼保健院;
6.国家卫生健康委员会科学技术研究所

收稿日期:2021-08-16 修回日期:2021-10-12 发布日期:2022-08-17 出版日期:2022-08-10
通讯作者: 关宏岩,E-mail:hongyanguan@126.com
作者简介:贾妮(1981-),女,助理研究员,硕士学位,主要研究方向为儿童早期发展;许梦雪(1989-),女,助理研究员,硕士学位,主要研究方向为儿童早期发展。注:^*共同第一作者。
基金资助:
北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划(2015-3-88);北京市卫健委财政资金延续性项目(2021-2022年)

Preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version ofParent-Child Interaction Feeding Scale

JIA Ni^*, XU Meng-xue^*, DING Mei-qi, YAN Shuang-qin, ZHANG Qing-lan, WANG Bao-zhen, LI Yuan-yuan, GUAN Hong-yan

^*Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China

Received:2021-08-16 Revised:2021-10-12 Online:2022-08-10 Published:2022-08-17
Contact: GUAN Hong-yan, E-mail: hongyanguan@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的引入并修订美国华盛顿大学的亲子互动-喂养量表,并在中国人群中进行信效度研究。方法按照国际测试委员会指南,对原亲子互动-喂养量表进行翻译,形成中文版亲子互动-喂养量表(PCI-FS-C)。2018年6月—2019年1月方便抽样北京、银川、兰州和马鞍山市4所妇幼保健院,招募310例0~12个月母子对,采集婴儿一次完整喂养过程的视频,由经过美国华盛顿大学培训合格获得原版量表评估资质人员进行视频编码评分。抽样6例评估评分者信度;于14~21 d后随机抽样10%评估重测信度;随机抽样41例进行中文版婴儿-学步儿家庭环境观察评估表(IT-HOME-C)效标效度检验。使用多元线性回归进行区分效度分析。结果共获得273例有效样本。总量表、照护者和婴儿量表内部一致性Cronbach's α 系数分别为0.846、0.805和0.690;总量表、照护者和婴儿量表的重测信度分别为0.847、0.778和0.480(P<0.01);总量表评分者信度Kendall相关性系数为0.860;PCI-FS-C的总分、照护者和婴儿量表总分与IT-HOME-C总分呈显著性中度正相关(r=0.526、0.506、0.427,P＜0.05)。控制混杂因素后,婴儿年龄与PCI-FS-C量表总分、照护者量表和婴儿量表总分显著相关(b=3.24、2.31、0.92)。结论中文版亲子互动-喂养量表在中国人群中具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为我国婴儿喂养亲子互动的评估工具。今后可以考虑开展大样本量分层抽样的本土化常模研究。

关键词: 亲子互动评估, 婴幼儿喂养, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To introduce Nursing Child Interaction (PCI) Feeding Scale into China, and to assess the reliability and validity of PCI Feeding Scale in Chinese parent-child dyads. Methods Under the recommended steps by the International Testing Committee, PCI Feeding Scale was translated, then Chinese Version of Parent-Child Interaction Feeding Scale (PCI-FS-C) was developed. From June 2018 to January 2019, 310 parent-child dyads from four hospitals in Beijing, Yinchuan, Lanzhou and Maanshan were selected by convenience sampling, and PCI-FS-C was adopted to code their feeding interaction. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient) and test-retest reliability (inter-item consistency) conducted with 10% of the samples randomly selected. Six samples were selected to evaluate rater reliability. Chinese Version of Infant-Toddler Home Observation Measurement of the Environment (IT-HOME-C) was used to exam the concurrent validity by Spearman correlation in 41 samples. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate discriminant validity. Results Totally 273valid mother-infant dyads were included in this study. The Cronbach's α coefficients of total score, caregiver and infant subscale scores were 0.846, 0.805 and 0.690, respectively. Both caregiver subscale (r=0.778) and PCI-FS-C (r=0.847) had excellent test-retest reliability, while the infant subcale showed acceptable test-retest reliability (r=0.480) (P< 0.01). For rater reliability, the Kendall coefficient of PCI-FS-C was 0.860. PCI-FS-C, caregiver subscale and infant subscale were moderately associated with IT-HOME-C (r=0.526, 0.506, 0.427, P＜0.05). After controlling for mixed factors, there were significant differences among different age groups in PCI-FS-C, caregiver subscale and infant subscale (b=3.24, 2.31, 0.92). Conclusions PCI-FS-C is a valid assessment for Chinese mother-infants, which fills the gap for assessment using an Objective measurement of caregiver/parent-child interaction in China. Enlarged sample size is suggested for culture-adapted study in future.

Key words: parent-child interaction scale, infant feeding, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R174

贾妮, 许梦雪, 丁美琦, 严双琴, 章青兰, 王宝珍, 李园园, 关宏岩. 中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 839-844.

JIA Ni, XU Meng-xue, DING Mei-qi, YAN Shuang-qin, ZHANG Qing-lan, WANG Bao-zhen, LI Yuan-yuan, GUAN Hong-yan. Preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version ofParent-Child Interaction Feeding Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2022, 30(8): 839-844.

参考文献

[1] Chowdhury ZT, Hurley KM, Jahan M, et al. Non-responsive feeding behaviors are negatively associated with growth and dietary diversity at 24 months in Rural Bangladesh[J]. The FASEB Journal, 2016,30: 432-438
[2] 养育照护促进儿童早期发展:从帮助儿童生存发展到实现人类健康和潜能的框架[EB/OL].https:apps.who.int/iris/handle/10.665/272604?locale-attribute=en&.
[3] Sumner G,Spietz A. NCAST Caregiver/Parent-Child Feeding Manual [M]. Seattle: NCAST Publications, University of Washington, 2004: 8-11,109-120.
[4] Program: Parent-Child Interaction (PCI) Feeding and Teaching Scales[EB/OL].(2021-11-12) https://www.pcrprograms.org/parent-child-interaction-pci-feeding-teaching-scales/
[5] Cho Y, Hirose T, Tomita N, et al. Infant mental health intervention for preterm infants in japan: promotions of maternal mental health, mother-infant interactions, and social support by providing continuous home visits until the corrected infant age of 12 months [J]. Infant Ment Health, 2013,34(1):47-59.
[6] Firk C, Dahmen B, Lehmann C, et al. A mother-child intervention program in adolescent mothers and their children to improve maternal sensitivity, child responsiveness and child development (the TeeMo study): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2015,27(16):230.
[7] Spieker SJ, Oxford ML, Kelly JF, et al. Promoting first relationships: Randomized trial of a relationship-based intervention for toddlers in child welfare[J]. Child Maltreat, 2012,17(4):271.
[8] Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK, et al. International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation:Second edition[J]. Psicothema, 2013, 25(2):151-157.
[9] Tesh EM, Holditch-Davis D. HOME inventory and NCATS: relation to mother and child behaviors during naturalistic observations. Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment. Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale[J]. Res Nurs Health, 1997,20(4):295-307.
[10] 卢珊,李璇,姜霁航,等.中文版婴儿-学步儿家庭环境观察评估表的信效度分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2018,26(2): 244-248.
[11] Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice[M].3rd ed. Prentice Hall, 2008.
[12] Bradley RH,Corwyn RF. Caring for children around the world: A view from HOME[J]. Int J Behav Dev, 2005, 26: 468-478
[13] Lotzin A, Lu X, Kriston L. Observational tools for measuring parent-infant interaction: A systematic review[J]. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev,2015, 18:99-132

[1]	尹晓辉, 王葳, 张姣姣, 王洋, 许亚红. 父亲参与婴儿教养量表的汉化[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 369-373.
[2]	张显达, 李雪, 廖敏. 3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 822-827.
[3]	王佳, 黄静, 梁亚红, 席静, 王艳艳. 青少年直觉进食量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 553-557.
[4]	郑瑞璇, 章丽丽, 周自云, 曹佳妍, 周星, 钱雨倩, 堵飞宇, 程灶火. 婴幼儿孤独症筛查问卷的初步编制和信效度分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 376-380.
[5]	肖婷, 肖湘, 储康康, 柯晓燕. 中文版量化的婴幼儿孤独症筛查量表信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 381-385.
[6]	黄楹, 张海峰, 童连. 婴幼儿回应性照护评价量表的初步编制与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 386-391.
[7]	张晶, 卞晓燕, SQUIRES Jane, 宋魏, 彭咏梅, 杜莉, 朱丽萍. 年龄与发育进程问卷:社会-情绪(第2版)中文版的效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(3): 249-253.
[8]	文竹, 李焱, 林裕雄, 孙智信, 江文庆. 认知缓慢特质量表中文版修订及信效度评估[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1297-1303.
[9]	王晓娟, 许梦雪, 张梦楠, 任霞, 江媛媛, 张雪娇, 杨琳, 吴建新, 张霆, 朱宗涵, 关宏岩. 学龄前儿童园外运动行为问卷的初步编制及信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1304-1308.
[10]	孙亚茹, 刘婷, 尹翠艳, 王欣, 牛玉硕, 李葵南, 杨秀玲. 儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1063-1067.
[11]	冯围围, 王惠珊, 张彤, 杨玉凤, 许志飞, 潘晓平, 王广海, 徐韬, 中国婴幼儿睡眠状况评估量表常模制定工作协作组. 中国婴儿睡眠状况评估量表的信效度验证及全国常模构建[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1073-1077.
[12]	何彦璐, 解雅春, 刘丰, 陈玮锭, 杨志勇, 张光宝, 洪琴, 池霞, 童梅玲. 3～6岁儿童基本运动能力评估量表信度和效度的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(8): 848-851.
[13]	殷珂, 张婷, 宋志霄, 张莉, 乔秀芸, 李燕. 婴儿饮食行为量表的编制与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(6): 650-654.
[14]	冯围围, 潘晓平, 王惠珊, 张悦, 金曦, 黄小娜, 徐韬, 张彤, 中国婴幼儿睡眠状况评估量表编制研究省级协作组. 中国婴儿睡眠状况评估量表的编制与评价研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(5): 468-472.
[15]	梁显荣, 谭朱江, 曹建国, 彭康龙, 陈土容, 龚蓉, 陈钦儿. 四格移步试验在平衡功能障碍儿童中的信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(3): 309-312.

中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究

Preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version ofParent-Child Interaction Feeding Scale

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics