欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2001, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1): 53-55.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

溴莫普林胶囊人体生物等效性研究

张鉴, 王本杰1, 郭瑞臣1   

  1. 山东省立医院, 济南250007;
    1山东大学齐鲁医院, 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2000-10-23 修回日期:2000-12-01 发布日期:2020-12-01
  • 作者简介:张鉴, 男, 45 岁, 副主任药师, 研究方向为临床药学。郭瑞臣, 男, 45 岁, 主任药师、教授、硕士研究生导师, 山东大学临床药理研究所副主任, 研究方向为临床药学和临床药理学。

Bioequivalence of brodimoprim capsules in 18 healthy volunteers

ZHANG Jian, WANG Ben-Jie1, GUO Rui-Chen1   

  1. Shandong Provincial Hcspital, Jinan 250007;
    1Qi Lu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012
  • Received:2000-10-23 Revised:2000-12-01 Published:2020-12-01

摘要: 目的 评价国产溴莫普林胶囊与进口hyprim 片的生物等效性, 为其临床应用提供试验依据。方法 采用单剂双交叉试验设计, 以乙萘酚为内标, 采用高效液相色谱法测定血中溴莫普林浓度, 计算药代动力学参数及试验制剂的相对生物利用度, 评价两制剂的生物等效性。结果 溴莫普林试验制剂和参比制剂主要药代动力学参数t1/2(α) 分别为(2.1 ±1.0)和(1.9 ±0.9)h, t1/2(β)分别为(43.2 ±4.8)和(42.4±4.3)h, Tpeak 分别为(3.4 ±1.6)和(3.1 ±1.5)h, Cmax 分别为(5.9 ±0.9)和(5.9±1.0)μg·ml-1 AUC0~132分别为(360.2 ±55.3)和(358.7 ±52.6)μg·h·ml-1, AUC0~∞分别为(423.8 ±56.0)和(422.5±51.1)μg·h·ml-1。试验制剂溴莫普林胶囊相对生物利用度F 为(99.7 ±4.8)%。结论 溴莫普林试验制剂和参比制剂单剂口服双交叉试验AUC0~132无显著性差异(P >0.05)。进一步双单侧t 检验和(1~2α)置信区间分析个体间、周期间和剂型间符合生物等效的假设, 即溴莫普林胶囊和进口hyprim 片为生物等效制剂。

关键词: 溴莫普林, hyprim, 生物等效性, 乙萘酚, 高效液相色谱法

Abstract: Aim To evaluate the bioequivalence of demestic brodimoprim capsules and imported hyprim tablets and provide experimental basis for clinical application. Methods A single dosage of Brodimoprim or hyprim was given to 18 healthy volunteers in a randomized 2-way crossover test and the brodimoprim concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC withβ-naphtol as internal standard. The pharmacokinetic parameters and the relative bioavailability of the two preparations were calculated and their bioequivalence was evaluated. Results The major pharm aco kin etic parameters of test and reference preparations were as follows respectively: t1/2(α) (2.1 ± 1.0) and (1.9±0.9) h,t1/2(β) (43.2 ± 4.8) and (42.4 ± 4.3) h, Tpeak(3.4 ± 1.6) and (3.1 ± 1.5) h, Cmax (5.9 ± 0.9) and (5.9 ± 1.0) μg·ml-1,AUC0~132 (360.2 ± 55.3) and (358.7 ± 52.6) μg·ml-1,AUC0~∞ (423.8 ± 56.0) and (422.5 ± 51.1) μg·ml-1. The relative bioavailability (F) of b rod imp rim capsules was (99.7 ± 4.8) %。Conclusion The multi factorial analysis of variance showed that there was no significant difference in AUC0~132 between the test and reference preparations (P > 0.05). The bioequivalent assumption was proved by further two one-side t-test and (1~2α) confidence interval analysis in individuals, periods and forms of these two preparations

Key words: brodimoprim capsule, hyprim, bioequivalence, naphthol, HPLC