欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2006, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (12): 1408-1411.

• 研究原著 • 上一篇    下一篇

顺铂加吉西他滨与顺铂加长春瑞滨一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对照研究

赵文英, 吉兆宁   

  1. 皖南医学院弋矶山医院肿瘤内科, 芜湖 241000, 安徽
  • 收稿日期:2006-05-26 修回日期:2006-10-25 出版日期:2006-12-26 发布日期:2020-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 吉兆宁,男, 教授, 主任医师, 硕士生导师, 研究方向:恶性肿瘤的化学治疗和生物治疗。Tel:0553-5739060 E-mail:jzning@163.com
  • 作者简介:赵文英, 女, 副主任医师, 主要从事肿瘤内科工作, 侧重于肺癌、乳腺癌及消化道癌的研究。Tel:0553-3280078  E-mail:zhaowy98@yahoo.com.cn

Comparative study of cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

ZHAO Wen-ying, JI Zhao-ning   

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China
  • Received:2006-05-26 Revised:2006-10-25 Online:2006-12-26 Published:2020-11-06

摘要: 目的 探讨顺铂(DDP) 加吉西他滨(GEM) 与顺铂加长春瑞滨(NVB) 治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC) 的疗效、不良反应。方法 66 例NSCLC 患者分别接受GEM/DDP方案与NVB/DDP方案化疗。GEM/DDP(GP) 化疗方案:GEM 1 000 mg·m-2 d 1 、8;DDP75 mg·m-2, 总剂量分为3 d 使用, d l ~ 3 。NVB/DDP(NP) 化疗方案:NVB 25 mg·m-2d 1 、8;DDP80 mg·m-2, 总剂量分为3 d 使用, d 1 ~ 3 。21 d 为一周期, 所有病例均接受2 个周期以上的治疗。观察两组的近期有效率、中位生存时间(MST) 、1 年生存率、不良反应。结果 GP和NP方案的有效率分别为41.6 %和36.7 %, 中位生存期分别为10.3 个月和9.6 个月, 1 年生存率分别为44.4 %和40.0 %(P=0.33) 。GP组的III ~ IV 级血小板减少47.2 %, 显著高于NP组6.6 %(P<0.01), 而NP组的中性粒细胞减少高于GP组, 分别为60 %和33.3 %(P<0.05) 。结论 GP和NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC 疗效相当, 但毒性反应略有差别。

关键词: 非小细胞肺癌, 化疗, 吉西他滨, 长春瑞滨, 顺铂

Abstract: AIM: To explore the differences of efficacy and side-effects in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin or vinorelbine plus cisplatin.METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to GP(gemcitabine+cisplatin) grouPor NP(vinorelbine plus cisplatin)group.In GPgroup, 36 evaluable patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg·m-2IV on day 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg·m-2IV which was divided into 1 -3 days dosing, in a 21 days per cycle manner.In NPgroup, 30 evaluable patients were treated with vinorelbine 25 mg·m-2IV on day 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg·m-2IV which was divided into 1 -3 days dosing, 21 days per cycle.All the patients at least received two cycles therapy.The response rate, median survival time (MST), l year survival, and side-effects were observed.RESULTS: The response rates were 41.6 % vs 36.7 %;MST were 10.3 months vs 9.6 months;1 year survival rate were 44.4 %vs 40.0 %(P=0.33) in GPgrouPand NPgroup, respectively.III-IV grade thrombocytopenia toxicity incurred significantly higher in GPgrouPthan in NPgroup, with the occurrence rate being 47.2 % vs 6.6 % (P<0.01).However, III-IV grade granulocytopenia was significantly less incurred in GPgrouPthan in NPgroup, 33.3 % vs 60.0 % (P<0.05).CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that GP(gemcitabine +cisplatin) regime and NP(vinorelbine plus cisplatin) regime are equivalent in treating advanced NSCLC, however they have few different toxicities.

Key words: non-small cell lung cancer, chemotherapy, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, cisplatin

中图分类号: