欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2011, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 300-303.

• 药物治疗学 • 上一篇    下一篇

舒芬太尼与芬太尼用于全麻下脊柱矫形术中唤醒效果的比较

吴礼平1, 王文军2, 彭建明3, 高利臣4   

  1. 1湖南省马王堆医院麻醉科,长沙 410016,湖南
    2南华大学附属第一医院脊柱外科
    3麻醉科,衡阳 421002,湖南
    4中南大学临床药理研究所,长沙 410078,湖南
  • 收稿日期:2011-02-15 修回日期:2011-03-18 出版日期:2011-03-26 发布日期:2011-05-18
  • 作者简介:吴礼平,男,医学硕士,副主任医师,副教授,主要从事麻醉药物药理与脊髓功能保护相关研究。Tel: 13548650000 E-mail: wlp93117@yahoo.com.cn

Comparison on wake-up time of sufentanil and fentanyl on intraoperative wake-up test in general anesthesia patients undergoing spinal correction surgery

WU Li-ping1, WANG Wen-jun2, PENG Jian-ming3, GAO Li-chen4   

  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Mawangdui Hospital of Changsha 410016, Hunan, China;
    2Department of Spine Surgery,First Affiliated Hospital Nanhua University;
    3Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital Nanhua University,Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China;
    4Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha 410078, Hunan, China
  • Received:2011-02-15 Revised:2011-03-18 Online:2011-03-26 Published:2011-05-18

摘要: 目的: 对比研究舒芬太尼与芬太尼对脊柱畸形矫形术中唤醒时间及质量的影响,探讨在脊柱畸形矫形术中唤醒试验的操作方法,评估唤醒效果。方法: 脊柱畸形矫形患者38例,随机均分为舒芬太尼组和芬太尼组各19例。两组麻醉诱导均用咪唑安定 0.1 mg/kg、丙泊酚 1.5~2.0 mg/kg、阿曲库铵 0.15~0.20 mg/kg、舒芬太尼 0.2 μg/kg 或芬太尼 4.0 μg/kg 静脉注射,用舒芬太尼 0.1 μg/(kg·h)或芬太尼 1.0 μg/(kg·h)持续泵入维持术中镇痛,术中在需要唤醒前30 min左右停止阿曲库铵、舒芬太尼或芬太尼泵入,在需要唤醒时停止丙泊酚泵入,进行唤醒,比较唤醒时间和唤醒质量。结果: 在舒芬太尼与芬太尼用于脊柱畸形矫形术中唤醒试验的比较中两组患者性别、年龄、体重、手术时间和出血量差异无统计学意义;舒芬太尼组患者自主呼吸恢复时间、呼之睁眼时间及指令动作恢复时间均短于芬太尼(P<0.05)。唤醒成功时,唤醒质量比较舒芬太尼组优于芬太尼(P<0.05)。芬太尼患者出现1例术中疼痛及知晓,两组术后均无其他麻醉并发症。结论: 该术中唤醒试验方法能快速实现脊柱畸形矫形术的术中唤醒,舒芬太尼与芬太尼相比唤醒时间更短、唤醒质量较高。

关键词: 舒芬太尼, 芬太尼, 脊柱矫形术, 全身麻醉, 唤醒试验

Abstract: AIM: To research the effect of sufentanil and fentanyl on intraoperative wake-up time and quality in patients undergoing spinal correction surgery, and to study the operation method of intraoperatie wake-up test of spinal correction surgery, and further evaluate the effect of wake-up test.METHODS: Thirty eight cases of patients with spinal deformity were treated by spinal correction surgery. They were randomly divided into sufentanil group and fentanyl group with 19 patients in each group. The anesthesia induction was begun with intravenous infusion 0.1 mg/kg midazolam, 1.5-2.0 mg/kg propofol, 0.15-0.20 mg/kg atracurium and 0.2 μg/kg sufentanil or 4.0 μg/kg fentanyl. The anesthesia was maintained with continuous pump injection sufentanil 0.1 μg/(kg·h) or fentanyl 1 μg/(kg·h). Atracurium, sufentanil or fentanyl were stopped pump injection in the time of 30 min before needing awakening. The pump injection of propofol in the time of need awakening was stopped, and the process of waking up was begun. The wake-up time and quality were studied.RESULTS: The gender, age, weight and operation time were no statistically significant differences between sufentanil group and fentanyl group during the research. The recovery time of spontaneous breathing, open eyes, instruction moves of sufentanil group were shorter than fentanyl group (P<0.05). The wake-up quality of sufentanil group was better than fentanyl group (P<0.05). There was 1 case of patients with intraoperative pain and awareness in fentanyl group. Both groups had no other complications.CONCLUSION: This method of intraoperative wake-up test is fast and effective. The wake-up time of the anesthesia which used sufentanil is shorter than those of fentanyl group, and the wake-up quality is higher than the later.

Key words: Sufentanil, Fentanyl, Spinal Correction Surgery, General Anesthesia, Wake-up Test

中图分类号: