欢迎访问《中国临床药理学与治疗学》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

中国临床药理学与治疗学 ›› 2017, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 326-331.

• 药物治疗学 • 上一篇    下一篇

闭环肌松注射系统在上腹部开放手术中的应用

郭文俊,陈国栋,侯桂婷,金孝岠   

  1. 皖南医学院弋矶山医院麻醉科,芜湖 241001,安徽
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-19 修回日期:2017-01-18 出版日期:2017-03-26 发布日期:2017-03-29
  • 作者简介:郭文俊,男,硕士,主任医师,副教授,硕士研究生导师,研究方向:临床麻醉。 Tel:13605532244 E-mail:gwj8581@sina.com

Application of closed-loop muscle relaxant injection system in upper abdominal laparotomy

GUO Wenjun, CHEN Guodong, HOU Guiting, JIN Xiaoju    

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, Anhui, China
  • Received:2016-09-19 Revised:2017-01-18 Online:2017-03-26 Published:2017-03-29

摘要:

目的:研究闭环肌松注射系统(Closed-loop Muscle Relaxant Injection System,CLMRIS)在上腹部开放手术中使用的可行性。方法:选取择期90例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级全凭静脉全身麻醉上腹部开放手术患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分成闭环肌松注射系统输注组(E组)、经验给药组(C组)和闭环肌松注射系统联合经验给药组(EC组),分别记录不同时点的TOF值,以及各组肌松药诱导起效时间、开始插管时间、诱导剂量、插管条件评分、肌松药使用总量、手术时间、麻醉时间、恢复时间、恢复指数、术中体动反应发生次数、拔管躁动评分、PACU停留时间以及手术医生和麻醉医生满意度等。结果: 患者一般情况、手术时间、麻醉时间、恢复指数、肌松药起效时间与增药次数等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各组均能满足术中肌肉松弛的要求。在麻醉诱导阶段,E组和EC组的开始插管时间比C组长,但是插管评分较高,插管过程更加顺利,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在麻醉维持阶段,与EC组和C组两组比较,E组维库溴铵使用总剂量多,平均输注速度快,但是术中的体动反应发生率低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在术后麻醉苏醒阶段,与EC组和C组两组比较,E组恢复时间短,拔管即刻的TOF值高,而且拔管后20 min的肌松残余率也明显低于另外两组,患者在PACU的停留时间更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:闭环肌松注射系统在麻醉诱导期间能准确地判断插管时机,提供良好的插管条件;麻醉维持时可以提供良好的肌肉松弛条件,体动反应少;术后麻醉苏醒时可缩短患者恢复时间和PACU停留时间。因此,闭环肌松注射系统能安全有效地应用于上腹部开放手术麻醉患者,肌松监测具有较高的临床指导价值。

关键词: 闭环肌松注射系统, 可行性, 开腹手术

Abstract:

AIM: To study the feasibility of closed-loop muscle relaxant injection system(CLMRIS) in traditional laparotomy.  METHODS: 90 ASA I-II patients undergoing traditional laparotomy under total intravenous anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups: group E(administration by CLMRIS), group C(administration by experience) and group EC (administration combined CLMRIS with experience) using the random number table method. The TOF value at different points, the onset time of muscle relaxant, the time from induction to intubation, induced dosage, intubation condition score, total dosage of muscle relaxant, duration of surgery and anesthesia, recovery time and recovery index, the intraoperative frequency of body movement, extubation agitation score, PACU retention time and the satisfaction scores of anesthesiologist and operation doctor were all detected and recorded. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the general situation, operation time, anesthesia time, recovery index, onset time of muscle relaxant and the frequency drug delivery (P>0.05).All groups were able to meet the requirements of muscle relaxation during operation. During induction of anesthesia, intubation time of group E and group EC were longer than group C, but with higher intubation score and smoother intubation process (P<0.05). During the maintenance of anesthesia, group E consumed more vecuronium and demonstrated faster average infusion speed of vecuronium than the other two groups, but presented with fewer body movement (P<0.05). During the anesthesia recovery stage, group E was faster than the other two groups recovering from anesthesia with higher value of TOF and shorter retention time in PACU (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The CLMRIS can accurately recognize the intubation time and provide better conditions to intubation in the course of anesthesia induction. It can also provide good muscle relaxation condition with less body movement during operation while shorten the recovery time and the time stay in PACU postoperative as well. Therefore, the CLMRIS can be safely and effectively used in patients on upper abdominal open surgery under anesthesia, and muscle relaxation monitoring is referential for clinical application.

Key words: closed loop muscle injection system, feasibility, upper abdominal laparotomy

中图分类号: