Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Chinese

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2010, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 449-453.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Patient-controlled analgesia with sulfentanyl and propofol sedation for burn dressing changes

WANG Ming-cang, CHEN Ling-yang, LIN Xian-ju, CAO Dong-hang, XIANG Hai-fei   

  1. The Department of Anesthesiology , Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province,Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang,China
  • Received:2010-01-07 Revised:2010-03-04 Published:2020-09-17

Abstract: AIM: To investigate the feasibility of patient-controlled analgesia with sulfentanyl and propofol sedation for burn dressing changes. METHODS: Sixty patients ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ who had thermal burns of 20-50 percent total body surface area and were scheduled for burn dressing changes were randomly divided into three groups with twenty patients in each group. Each patient received an initial loading dose of i.v. sulfentanyl 0.25 μg/kg 5 min before the procedure, received target controlled infusion with propofol initial effect-site concentrations from 0.15 μg/kg at 2 min before the procedure. Adjusting the propofol effect-site concentrations to maintain BIS decline by 15-20 percent of baseline. The patients were allocated to receive on-demand analgesia with one of the three PCA-sulfentanyl demand doses-1, 3, and 5ug. The demand dose was delivered i.v. at a constant rate by a PCA pump with a 5-min lockout interval. Propofol and sulfentanyl comsumption, demands made per 10min,delivered per 10min and demand/delivery ratio were reorded, Pain intensity was assessed by the VAS score, Doctor and patents' satisfactories were asked. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizzy, respiratory depression and hypotension were recorded. RESULTS: Propofol comsumption in 5 μg group were significantly lower than those in 1 and 3 μg group(P<0.01, P<0.05), but higher in 1 μg group than those in 3 μg group(P<0.05). Total sulfentanyl comsumption dosage in 5 μg and 3μg group were significantly higher than those in the 1 μg group(P<0.01). During the dressing change procedure, mean VAS scores, demands made per 10min, delivered per 10min and demand/delivery ratio in the sulfentanyl 1 μg groups were significantly higher than those in the 3 and 5 μg groups(P<0.01), and there are no difference between 3 μg group and 5 μg group(P>0.05). Patients and doctors' satisfactories were signicantly higher in 3 and 5 μg groups than those in 1 μg group(P<0.01), while no difference between 3 μg group and 5 μg group(P>0.05). The incidence of dizzy were signicantly higher in 5 μg groups than those in 1 μg and 3 μg group(P<0.01, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The optimal PCA-sulfentanyl demand dose in our study is 3 μg after an i.v. initial loading dose of 0.25 μg/kg and a lockout interval of 5 minutes, Combining with propofol for sedation is safety and feasible.

Key words: Sulfentanyl, Patient-controlled analgesia, Sedation, Burn dressing change

CLC Number: