Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2013, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (12): 1375-1382.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Bioavailability assessment of the lipophilic benfotiamine as compared to a water-soluble thiamine hydrochloride after oral administration

LUO Xi1, CAI Ning-fang2, GUO Xin3, YU Peng1, LIU Zhi3, ZHENG Li-yun1, CHENG Ze-neng1   

  1. 1The Research Institute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013,Hunan, China;
    2Department of pharmacy, Zhangzhou municipal hospital of fujian province, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian, China;
    3Hunan Tiger Xiangya R&D Co., Ltd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, China
  • Received:2013-01-02 Revised:2013-11-26 Online:2013-12-26 Published:2014-01-04

Abstract: AIM: To study the bioavailability of the lipophilic benfotiamine as compared to a water-soluble thiamine hydrochloride after oral administration.METHODS: A randomized, crossover study involving 20 healthy male volunteers was carried. Each subject was given 300 mg benfotiamine or 220 mg thiamine hydrochloride. Blood samples were collected at different times and 24 h urine samples were collected after administration. The concentrations of thiamine and thiamine diphosphat in plasma or erythrocyte were determined by HPLC-Flu.The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin program and the mean excretion rate of hippuric acid in urine was also evaluated.RESULTS: The main pharmacokinetic parameters of thiamine in plasma after taking benfotiamine and thiamine hydrochloride were as follows: t1/2 were (2.5±0.2) and (2.0±0.8) h, respectively; AUC0-24 were (1763.1±432.7) and (182.0±93.8) μg·h·L-1, respectively; AUC0-∞ were (1837.3±466.5) and (195.8±96.6) μg·h·L-1, respectively; Cmax were (568.3±122.0) and (70.5±46.2) μg/L, respectively; CL/F were (172.3±39.2)and (1831.7±705.0) L/h, respectively; Vd/F were (627.9±131.8) and (5419.1±3586.6)L, respectively. The AUC0-24 of thiamine diphosphat in erythrocyte after taking benfotiamine and thiamine hydrochloride was (3212.4±740.7) and (881.8±316.2) μg·h·L-1, respectively. In comparison with thiamine hydrochloride, the relative bioavailability of thiamine and thiamine diphosphat in benfotiamine were (1147.3±490.3)% and (392.1±114.8)%, respectively. The excretion rate of hippuric acid in urine in 4 h after taking benfotiamine was significantly accelerated than that after taking thiamine hydrochloride.CONCLUSION: Benfotiamine is absorbed quickly, and has better bioavailability than thiamine hydrochloride. It can be transformed to thiamine in 4 h after administration.

Key words: Benfotiamine, Thiamine, Thiamine diphosphat, Bioavailability

CLC Number: