Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Chinese

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2017, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 52-59.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CHEN Jiaren, CUI Yudi, TIAN Hao, WANG Hao   

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2016-09-12 Revised:2016-11-09 Online:2017-01-26 Published:2017-01-23

Abstract:

AIM: To systematically review the therapeutic efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in treating major depressive disorder(MDD) with an updated meta-analysis.  METHODS: The databases of Pubmed and Clinical trials were searched to obtain the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of vortioxetine in treating MDD. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.RESULTS:Compared with placebo, 5 mg and 10 mg vortioxetine could significantly increase the Montgomery-sberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS)mean changes (WMD=-2.59, P=0.002; WMD=-3.47, P=0.000 3), the responder rate (OR=1.76, P=0.006; OR=2.18, P=0.005) and the rate of overall adverse events (OR=1.28, P=0.008; OR=1.33, P=0.01), suggesting better effectiveness but higher rate of adverse event of vortioxetine. There were no statistically significant differences between vortioxetine (5 mg) and positive drug duloxetine (60 mg) on MADRS mean changes (P=0.43) and responder rate (P=0.10), while the rate of overall adverse events of 5 mg vortioxetine was much lower(OR=0.52, P<0.000 1) . CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine is effective and relatively safe for the treatment of MDD.

Key words: major depressive disorder, vortioxetine, randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis

CLC Number: