Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 486-492.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2026.04.007
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yishan JIN1(
), Fengxiang JIANG2, Jiaorong TAN1, Minghua ZHU3,*(
)
Received:2025-11-18
Revised:2026-03-04
Online:2026-04-26
Published:2026-04-30
Contact:
Minghua ZHU
E-mail:jinyishan713@163.com;zhuminghua@shaphc.org
CLC Number:
Yishan JIN, Fengxiang JIANG, Jiaorong TAN, Minghua ZHU. Efficacy of bicyclol combined with Xuezhitong capsules in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(4): 486-492.
| Variable | Control group (n=80) | Experimental group (n=80) | Statistic | P value |
| Age (years) | 48.1±13.4 | 50.6±16.2 | t=?1.085 | 0.280 |
| Gender (male/female) | 55/25 | 57/23 | χ2=0.030 | 0.863 |
| ALT (U/L) | 60.8±72.1 | 54.2±40.5 | t=0.713 | 0.477 |
| AST (U/L) | 37.9±21.0 | 40.6±25.2 | t=?0.733 | 0.464 |
| GGT (U/L) | 63.3±68.9 | 73.4±88.4 | t=?0.805 | 0.422 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.17±1.37 | 4.84±0.99 | t=1.742 | 0.083 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.71±3.79 | 2.26±2.06 | t=0.920 | 0.359 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.80±1.48 | 3.49±1.21 | t=1.447 | 0.150 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.42±1.97 | 2.20±1.92 | t=0.711 | 0.478 |
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients in two groups
| Variable | Control group (n=80) | Experimental group (n=80) | Statistic | P value |
| Age (years) | 48.1±13.4 | 50.6±16.2 | t=?1.085 | 0.280 |
| Gender (male/female) | 55/25 | 57/23 | χ2=0.030 | 0.863 |
| ALT (U/L) | 60.8±72.1 | 54.2±40.5 | t=0.713 | 0.477 |
| AST (U/L) | 37.9±21.0 | 40.6±25.2 | t=?0.733 | 0.464 |
| GGT (U/L) | 63.3±68.9 | 73.4±88.4 | t=?0.805 | 0.422 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.17±1.37 | 4.84±0.99 | t=1.742 | 0.083 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.71±3.79 | 2.26±2.06 | t=0.920 | 0.359 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.80±1.48 | 3.49±1.21 | t=1.447 | 0.150 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.42±1.97 | 2.20±1.92 | t=0.711 | 0.478 |
| Indicator | Control group | Experimental group | P value (post- treatment) | |||||||
| Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | |||
| ALT (U/L) | 60.8±72.1 | 44.7±50.7 | ?26.4 | 0.000 | 54.2±40.5 | 31.5±22.3 | ?41.8 | 0.000 | 0.035 | |
| AST (U/L) | 37.9±21.0 | 29.6±18.3 | ?21.8 | 0.000 | 40.6±25.2 | 26.8±18.3 | ?33.9 | 0.000 | 0.335 | |
| GGT (U/L) | 63.3±68.9 | 54.5±58.8 | ?14.0 | 0.000 | 73.4±88.4 | 48.0±59.1 | ?34.6 | 0.000 | 0.491 | |
Table 2 Comparison of liver function indices before and after treatment between two groups
| Indicator | Control group | Experimental group | P value (post- treatment) | |||||||
| Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | |||
| ALT (U/L) | 60.8±72.1 | 44.7±50.7 | ?26.4 | 0.000 | 54.2±40.5 | 31.5±22.3 | ?41.8 | 0.000 | 0.035 | |
| AST (U/L) | 37.9±21.0 | 29.6±18.3 | ?21.8 | 0.000 | 40.6±25.2 | 26.8±18.3 | ?33.9 | 0.000 | 0.335 | |
| GGT (U/L) | 63.3±68.9 | 54.5±58.8 | ?14.0 | 0.000 | 73.4±88.4 | 48.0±59.1 | ?34.6 | 0.000 | 0.491 | |
| Indicator | Control group | Experimental group | P value (pre- vs. post-) | |||||||
| Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | |||
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.17±1.37 | 4.67±1.23 | ?9.6 | 0.000 | 4.84±0.99 | 4.14±0.93 | ?14.4 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.71±3.79 | 2.32±3.32 | ?14.3 | 0.000 | 2.26±2.06 | 1.69±1.48 | ?25.2 | 0.000 | 0.124 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.80±1.48 | 3.60±1.54 | ?5.2 | 0.058 | 3.49±1.21 | 3.14±1.49 | ?9.8 | 0.007 | 0.061 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.42±1.97 | 2.46±1.89 | 2.0 | 0.669 | 2.20±1.92 | 2.31±1.69 | 5.3 | 0.246 | 0.597 | |
Table 3 Comparison of lipid profiles before and after treatment between two groups
| Indicator | Control group | Experimental group | P value (pre- vs. post-) | |||||||
| Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | Pre- treatment | Post- treatment | Change rate (%) | P value | |||
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.17±1.37 | 4.67±1.23 | ?9.6 | 0.000 | 4.84±0.99 | 4.14±0.93 | ?14.4 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.71±3.79 | 2.32±3.32 | ?14.3 | 0.000 | 2.26±2.06 | 1.69±1.48 | ?25.2 | 0.000 | 0.124 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.80±1.48 | 3.60±1.54 | ?5.2 | 0.058 | 3.49±1.21 | 3.14±1.49 | ?9.8 | 0.007 | 0.061 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.42±1.97 | 2.46±1.89 | 2.0 | 0.669 | 2.20±1.92 | 2.31±1.69 | 5.3 | 0.246 | 0.597 | |
| Indicator | Control_Pre | Control_Post | Control_P value | Experimental_ pre | Experimental_ post | Ex p value | P value_post (control vs. experiment) |
| HA (ng/mL) | 186.5±42.3 | 128.3±31.5 | 0.001 | 192.3±45.6 | 98.8±26.7 | 0 | 0.012 |
| PCⅢ (ng/mL) | 124.3±35.6 | 92.6±27.8 | 0.002 | 128.5±37.2 | 68.4±21.5 | 0 | 0.008 |
| Ⅳ-C (ng/mL) | 98.7±28.4 | 76.4±21.3 | 0.003 | 102.4±29.8 | 54.3±18.6 | 0 | 0.015 |
| LN (ng/mL) | 145.2±32.1 | 112.5±26.7 | 0.001 | 148.7±33.5 | 86.2±22.3 | 0 | 0.009 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 12.5±4.3 | 8.5±3.2 | 0.002 | 13.2±4.5 | 5.5±2.1 | 0 | 0.003 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 8.7±3.1 | 6.2±2.5 | 0.005 | 9.1±3.3 | 3.8±1.9 | 0 | 0.007 |
| APRI score | 1.43±0.52 | 1.01±0.43 | 0.001 | 1.48±0.55 | 0.89±0.38 | 0 | 0.042 |
Table 4 Comparison of liver fibrosis, inflammatory indicators and APRI score before and after treatment in the two groups of patients
| Indicator | Control_Pre | Control_Post | Control_P value | Experimental_ pre | Experimental_ post | Ex p value | P value_post (control vs. experiment) |
| HA (ng/mL) | 186.5±42.3 | 128.3±31.5 | 0.001 | 192.3±45.6 | 98.8±26.7 | 0 | 0.012 |
| PCⅢ (ng/mL) | 124.3±35.6 | 92.6±27.8 | 0.002 | 128.5±37.2 | 68.4±21.5 | 0 | 0.008 |
| Ⅳ-C (ng/mL) | 98.7±28.4 | 76.4±21.3 | 0.003 | 102.4±29.8 | 54.3±18.6 | 0 | 0.015 |
| LN (ng/mL) | 145.2±32.1 | 112.5±26.7 | 0.001 | 148.7±33.5 | 86.2±22.3 | 0 | 0.009 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 12.5±4.3 | 8.5±3.2 | 0.002 | 13.2±4.5 | 5.5±2.1 | 0 | 0.003 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 8.7±3.1 | 6.2±2.5 | 0.005 | 9.1±3.3 | 3.8±1.9 | 0 | 0.007 |
| APRI score | 1.43±0.52 | 1.01±0.43 | 0.001 | 1.48±0.55 | 0.89±0.38 | 0 | 0.042 |
| Outcome | Control group (n=80) | Experimental group (n=80) | χ2 value | P value |
| Adverse event rate | 10.0% (8/80) | 6.25% (5/80) | 0.978 | 0.323 |
| Adverse event types | Dizziness (6), nausea (4), rash (4), abdominal distension (3) | Rash (4), dizziness (3), abdominal distension (2), nausea (2) | - | - |
Table 5 Comparison of adverse events between two groups
| Outcome | Control group (n=80) | Experimental group (n=80) | χ2 value | P value |
| Adverse event rate | 10.0% (8/80) | 6.25% (5/80) | 0.978 | 0.323 |
| Adverse event types | Dizziness (6), nausea (4), rash (4), abdominal distension (3) | Rash (4), dizziness (3), abdominal distension (2), nausea (2) | - | - |
| 1 |
范建高, 杨荣. 全球非酒精性脂肪性肝病的流行趋势与疾病负担[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2023, 43 (4): 248- 252.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20230202-00038 |
| 2 |
中国医药生物技术协会慢病管理分会, 中国研究型医院学会肝病(中西医结合)专业委员会, 中华医学会全科医学分会, 等. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病基层诊疗与管理指南(2025年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2025, 24 (5): 513- 525.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20250305-00073 |
| 3 |
Eslam M, Sarin SK, Wong VWS, et al. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. Hepatology International, 2020, 14 (6): 889- 919.
doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10094-2 |
| 4 |
Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, et al. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies[J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24 (7): 908- 922.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9 |
| 5 |
李小珍, 冯丹丹, 赵华山. 强肝胶囊联合双环醇片治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的疗效[J]. 西北药学杂志, 2025, 40 (3): 214- 220.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2407.2025.03.030 |
| 6 |
邵俊侠, 王静. 血滞通胶囊联合阿托伐他汀对老年非酒精性脂肪肝病人肝纤维化的影响以及疗效分析[J]. 实用老年医学, 2020, 34 (9): 930- 933.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2020.09.018 |
| 7 |
范建高, 徐小元, 南月敏, 等. 代谢相关(非酒精性)脂肪性肝病防治指南(2024年版)[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27 (4): 494- 510.
doi: 10.12449/JCH240908 |
| 8 |
中国血脂管理指南修订联合专家委员会. 中国血脂管理指南(基层版2024年)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52 (4): 330- 337.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20240102-00002 |
| 9 |
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis - 2021 updat e[J]. J Hepatol, 2021, 75 (3): 659- 689.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.025 |
| 10 |
陈智恒, 高博文, 桂蓓, 等. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病发生脂肪性肝炎的无创诊断模型构建及分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39 (8): 1857- 1866.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.08.014 |
| 11 |
李钊, 黄赞松, 李繁. 非诺贝特联合双环醇治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者肝组织PPARγ2 mRNA水平变化[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2021, 24 (1): 59- 62.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.01.016 |
| 12 |
Wu T, Roger H, Xie L, et al. Bicyclol for chronic hepatitis B[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006, 2006 (4): CD004480.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd004480 |
| 13 |
Liu TT, Sun HF, Tang MZ, et al. Bicyclol attenuates pulmonary fibrosis with silicosis via both canonical and non-canonical TGF-β1 signaling pathways[J]. J Transl Med, 2024, 22 (1): 682.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05399-x |
| 14 |
Hou Y, Jiao Y, Zhang X, et al. Allicin ameliorates liver damage in Streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats by modulating intestinal microbiota and metabolic processes[J]. Food Biosci, 2025, 64, 105861.
doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.105861 |
| 15 |
Luo X, Zhang H, Wei X, et al. Aloin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response and apoptosis by inhibiting the activation of NF-κB[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23 (3): 517.
doi: 10.3390/molecules23030517 |
| 16 |
Zhang C, He X, Sheng Y, et al. Allicin regulates energy homeostasis through brown adipose tissue[J]. iScience, 2020, 23 (5): 101113.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101113 |
| [1] | ZHAO Zishuo, ZHU Yuguang, MA Yanshan, LI Zhiwei, JING Yongshuai, XIE Yinghua. Effects of different formulations of high-fat diet on establishment of a non-alcoholic fatty liver model in rats [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(5): 543-553. |
| [2] | CHEN Lijun, FANG Wei. Protective effects and mechanism of bicyclol against sepsis-induced fulminant hepatitis in mice [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(11): 1249-1259. |
| [3] | DU Wenpeng, AO Jiangen, TAO Yi, WU Guansheng, HE Jiake. Study on the factors affecting the steady-state blood concentration of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune diseases [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2022, 27(6): 645-651. |
| [4] | WANG Ruijie, WANG Liang, XU Dan, ZHOU Miaomiao, LI Jiming. Effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on blood lipids and inflammatory factors in patients with coronary heart disease [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2022, 27(4): 409-417. |
| [5] | ZHANG Liang, LIAO Yongqun, XIA Qinchuan, ZHOU Shitong, LI Xiaoli. Ferroptosis regulatory signaling pathway and its research progress in related diseases [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2022, 27(2): 227-234. |
| [6] | WANG Gaoqing, JIANG Wei, HUA Yongfei. Curative efficacy of retetrexel combined with laparoscopic hepatectomy in treatment of patients with primary liver cancer and its effects on liver function and CIART, AFP-L3 and GP73 [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2020, 25(7): 752-756. |
| [7] | WU Jiayuan, ZHENG Li, MO Juanfen, GUO Li, CAO Chenxi, BAO Yi. Regulation of N-acetylcysteine on peripheral circulatory and hepatic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease mice [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2019, 24(9): 989-996. |
| [8] | ZHOU Hongping, YANG Xingxin, ZHUANG Rangxiao, SHAO Yidan, XI Jianjun, LIAO Li, REN Bailu, WANG Pingping, YU Shuying, SHI Tingting. Effects of activated carbon N-acetylcysteine sustained-release microcapsule on miRNA of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in young rats [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(3): 263-270. |
| [9] | YU Jun, JIN Xiaoju, GUO Jianrong, LU Meijing, CAO Ya, CHANG Yan. Effects of different hemodilution on hepatorenal coagulation and liver function of eldly patients underwent hepatectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(3): 308-312. |
| [10] | ZHANG Wenxi, GAO Wei, ZHAO Jiajia, CAI Qiao, ZHAO Bei, ZHENG Yan. Curative effect of erythromycin in the treatment of ureaplasma mycoplasma pneumonia and its influence on cell subset and liver function [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(2): 194-198. |
| [11] | ZHAO Pengcheng, ZHANG Chao. Effects of propofol combined with sevoflurane on kidney function and immune function in patients with cirrhosis after splenectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 23(11): 1276-1281. |
| [12] | LI Dong-liang, LI Bing, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, WANG Xiao, FANG Jian, ZHANG Shi-an, CAI Li-rong. Effects of two types of schisandra preparations on the plasma concentrations of immunosuppressant tacrolimus in rats and protective effect of liver injury [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2015, 20(3): 256-260. |
| [13] | LUO Hui-ying, HUANG Ya-hong, ZHU Li-juan, WANG Li-juan. Protective effect of Potentilla anserina on ethanol-induced liver damage in mice [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2014, 19(10): 1107-1110. |
| [14] | XIN Hua-wen, LIU Hui-ming, LI Yuan-qi, HUANG Hui, ZHAO Li, YU Ai-rong, LI Qing, WU Xiao-chun, LI Wei-liang, XIONG Lei. Association of ABCC2 genetic polymorphism with liver disfunction induced by cyclosporine in Chinese renal transplant recipients [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013, 18(7): 778-784. |
| [15] | CHEN Xiang-pan, YANG Jie-ren, LIU Yan, HAO Wei, LI Xian-wei. Effect of sequoyitol on lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetic rats [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013, 18(6): 633-637. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||