Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Chinese

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2010, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 416-421.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

In vivo evaluation of dimenhydrinate orally disintegrating tablets: Comparison of the pharmacokinetics with conventional tablets in rhesus

HE Jian-chang, LIU Di, FENG En-fu, ZHANG Qing, DONG Li-chun, XU Gui-li   

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2009-11-18 Revised:2010-01-15 Published:2020-09-17
  • Contact: XU Gui-li, female, master, professor, majoring in pharmacology. E-mail: guilixukm@163.com
  • About author:HE Jian-chang, male, master, majoring in pharmacokinetics. Tel: 0871-5413120 E-mail:kmhejianchang@163.com

Abstract: AIM: To compare the pharmacokinetics characteristics of dimenhydrinate orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) and conventional tablets in rhesus plasma. METHODS: A randomized two-period, self-control crossover study with regard to the pharmacokinetic characteristics of dimenhydrinate ODTs and conventional tablets was executed in rhesus. The plasma concentrations of dimenhydrinate after oral administration of two formulations (both doses were 50 mg dimenhydrinate) were estimated by a simple, sensitive and specific HPLC-UV method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were computed by software DAS 2.0 and compared by statistic analysis. RESULTS: The relative bioavailability of dimenhydrinate ODTs (F0-12 h, F0-∞ were (154±42)% and (150±53)%, respectively, compared with conventional tablets. There was no significant difference in area under the plasma concentration (AUC0-∞) (P>0.05) between the two formulations. Interestingly, there had statistically significant difference between the dimenhydrinate ODTs and conventional tablets in Cmax, area under the plasma concentration (AUC0-12 h) (P<0.05). Moreover, dimenhydrinate ODTs showed a markedly, but not significantly shorter tmax compared with conventional tablets (P>0.05). The method was sensitive with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 10 ng/mL and good linearity in the range 10-2000 ng/mL for dimenhydrinate (r=0.99995). All the validation data, such as accuracy, precision, intra-day and inter-day repeatability, were within the required limits. CONCLUSION: Dimenhydrinate ODTs have a faster absorption compared with conventional tablets.

Key words: Dimenhydrinate, Orally disintegrating tablets, Pharmacokinetics

CLC Number: